1 |
♠Q753
♥T87
♦J42
♣JT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 2♥ S -1 ♦K 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
210 2.00 1.00 1N W +4 ♥7 6-Walker-McCabe vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
400 1.00 2.00 3N W ♥T 4-Smith-Smith vs 2-Grant-Reiss
460 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥7 7-Haley-Gunter vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
|
2 |
♠KQT2
♥64
♦AQJ94
♣Q8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT5/6 |
EW: 1♦ -/1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥4/5 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♣7 6-Walker-McCabe vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
100 2.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♣7 7-Haley-Gunter vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
200 1.00 2.00 4♥ S -2 ♦3 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
300 0.00 3.00 3♦ N -3 ♣T 4-Smith-Smith vs 2-Grant-Reiss
|
3 |
♠QJ5
♥AKT4
♦Q63
♣T43
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 2♠ S -1 ♥3 6-Walker-McCabe vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
120 1.00 2.00 2N W ♠5 4-Smith-Smith vs 2-Grant-Reiss
120 1.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♥4 7-Haley-Gunter vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
120 1.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♥4 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
|
4 |
♠QJT2
♥QT8
♦T875
♣Q4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2/3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♥6 4-Smith-Smith vs 2-Grant-Reiss
600 2.00 1.00 3N W ♠Q 6-Walker-McCabe vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
650 1.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♣2 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
680 0.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♦5 7-Haley-Gunter vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
|
5 |
♠Q4
♥843
♦QT2
♣Q6543
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5/4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥8 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Grant-Reiss
150 2.00 1.00 3♣ E +2 ♦9 7-Haley-Gunter vs 6-Walker-McCabe
400 0.50 2.50 3N W ♦2 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
400 0.50 2.50 5♣ E ♦7 1-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 4-Smith-Smith
|
6 |
♠Q9543
♥A
♦J764
♣873
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 1♠ N +1 ♦A 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
80 2.00 1.00 1♥ E ♠A 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Grant-Reiss
110 1.00 2.00 1♥ E +1 ♠A 1-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 4-Smith-Smith
150 0.00 3.00 1N E +2 ♦5 7-Haley-Gunter vs 6-Walker-McCabe
|
7 |
♠J632
♥T9
♦KT653
♣53
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 2♦ 6♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♦5 1-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 4-Smith-Smith
100 2.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♦2 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Grant-Reiss
230 1.00 2.00 3♥ E +3 ♣5 7-Haley-Gunter vs 6-Walker-McCabe
640 0.00 3.00 5♣ W +2 ♦3 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
|
8 |
♠QJ97
♥A763
♦AQ5
♣65
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 2♣ W -4 ♠7 1-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 4-Smith-Smith
AVE+ NP 1.80 0.00 7-Haley-Gunter vs 6-Walker-McCabe
120 1.50 1.50 2N N ♥Q 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
50 0.17 2.83 2♠ E -1 ♦K 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Grant-Reiss
|
9 |
♠QJT42
♥63
♦65
♣KT76
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 2♠ N +1 ♦7 6-Walker-McCabe vs 4-Smith-Smith
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ E +1 ♠A 1-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 7-Haley-Gunter
170 0.17 2.83 3♥ W +1 ♠T 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
|
10 |
♠82
♥AJ6
♦KQJ3
♣9764
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.83 0.17 3N S ♥2 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♥2 6-Walker-McCabe vs 4-Smith-Smith
100 0.17 2.83 3♠ S -1 ♥2 1-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 7-Haley-Gunter
|
11 |
♠QT4
♥AT87
♦J743
♣A4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 2♦ W -2 ♣A 1-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 7-Haley-Gunter
90 1.50 1.50 2♦ W ♣A 6-Walker-McCabe vs 4-Smith-Smith
120 0.17 2.83 1N W +1 ♠4 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
|
12 |
♠A32
♥Q963
♦KQ
♣T432
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 3♦ E +2 ♣K 1-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 7-Haley-Gunter
400 1.50 1.50 5♦ E ♦7 6-Walker-McCabe vs 4-Smith-Smith
500 0.17 2.83 4♥* S -2 ♦8 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Henderson-Wesolowski
|
13 |
♠K96
♥J3
♦Q9832
♣T83
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥8 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Smith-Smith
600 1.50 1.50 3N S ♥8 2-Grant-Reiss vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
600 1.50 1.50 3N S ♥8 7-Haley-Gunter vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
150 0.00 3.00 2N S +1 ♥5 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 6-Walker-McCabe
|
14 |
♠K
♥KT73
♦Q64
♣AQ852
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ W ♥3 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 6-Walker-McCabe
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ E ♥3 2-Grant-Reiss vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
450 0.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♥3 7-Haley-Gunter vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
450 0.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♥3 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Smith-Smith
|
15 |
♠KQ875
♥Q2
♦J7
♣KQ98
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 2N S ♥3 2-Grant-Reiss vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
100 1.50 1.50 2N S -1 ♥3 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 6-Walker-McCabe
100 1.50 1.50 2N S -1 ♥3 7-Haley-Gunter vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
200 0.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♥3 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Smith-Smith
|
16 |
♠7542
♥Q962
♦K7
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2/3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 1.00 3N S ♠3 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 6-Walker-McCabe
400 2.00 1.00 3N N ♥4 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Smith-Smith
400 2.00 1.00 3N N ♣T 2-Grant-Reiss vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
150 0.00 3.00 2N S +1 ♠3 7-Haley-Gunter vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
|
17 |
♠A4
♥Q8
♦A97653
♣KT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 5♦ N +1 ♣J 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 2-Grant-Reiss
400 0.83 2.17 3N S ♠2 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
400 0.83 2.17 5♦ N ♠J 4-Smith-Smith vs 7-Haley-Gunter
|
18 |
♠AJ52
♥J632
♦J8
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 2♥ W -3 ♦J 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 2-Grant-Reiss
50 1.50 1.50 2♦ W -1 ♦8 4-Smith-Smith vs 7-Haley-Gunter
100 0.17 2.83 2♣ S -1 ♥K 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
|
19 |
♠AJ982
♥965
♦2
♣AQ76
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3/4♥ 7♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠0 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 2.83 0.17 4♠ S +3 ♥7 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
450 1.50 1.50 5♠ N ♥3 4-Smith-Smith vs 7-Haley-Gunter
420 0.17 2.83 4♠ N ♠6 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 2-Grant-Reiss
|
20 |
♠AK9743
♥T2
♦86
♣T83
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♦7 4-Smith-Smith vs 7-Haley-Gunter
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 ♥4 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Wagener-Nelson
100 1.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 ♦4 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 2-Grant-Reiss
|
21 |
♠876
♥Q543
♦832
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 6/5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 3N W -1 ♥3 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 6-Walker-McCabe
180 1.50 1.50 2N E +2 ♠3 2-Grant-Reiss vs 7-Haley-Gunter
460 0.17 2.83 3N W +2 ♦2 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
|
22 |
♠KT
♥T6
♦T65
♣KQT932
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥1 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4/3♦ 6/5♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 4♠ W -2 ♣K 2-Grant-Reiss vs 7-Haley-Gunter
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦3 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
680 0.17 2.83 4♥ E +2 ♣6 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 6-Walker-McCabe
|
23 |
♠KQJT862
♥K95
♦4
♣53
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 4♠ 1NT ♣6/7 ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.83 0.17 4♠ N ♣2 2-Grant-Reiss vs 7-Haley-Gunter
300 1.50 1.50 4♥ W -3 ♦4 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 6-Walker-McCabe
170 0.17 2.83 2♠ N +2 ♦2 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
|
24 |
♠52
♥98754
♦73
♣AJ85
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 3♦ S +2 ♠4 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 6-Walker-McCabe
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ S +1 ♠4 2-Grant-Reiss vs 7-Haley-Gunter
110 0.17 2.83 3♦ S ♠J 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
|
25 |
♠65
♥85
♦AT97653
♣63
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1/2♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣5 ♦4/3 ♥6/5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.83 0.17 3♦ E -5 ♣A 6-Walker-McCabe vs 2-Grant-Reiss
110 1.50 1.50 3♦ N ♥3 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
120 0.17 2.83 2N W ♦7 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 4-Smith-Smith
|
26 |
♠J83
♥AK53
♦J965
♣75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5/4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 3♣ S ♠A 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
100 1.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♣A 6-Walker-McCabe vs 2-Grant-Reiss
110 0.17 2.83 2♠ E ♣K 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 4-Smith-Smith
|
27 |
♠KQ64
♥J74
♦AQ
♣K762
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 3/4♦ 2/3♥ 1/2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 2.83 0.17 4♠* W -4 ♦A 6-Walker-McCabe vs 2-Grant-Reiss
400 0.83 2.17 3N N ♠9 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 4-Smith-Smith
400 0.83 2.17 3N N ♦T 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
|
28 |
♠AKT93
♥762
♦QJ4
♣AQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5/6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 2♠ N ♦9 6-Walker-McCabe vs 2-Grant-Reiss
100 1.50 1.50 2♣* E -1 ♠Q 5-Wagener-Nelson vs 4-Smith-Smith
90 0.17 2.83 1N S ♥K 3-Henderson-Wesolowski vs 1-Turnquist-Schamberg
|