1 |
♠2
♥AT54
♦94
♣K75432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 5♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 4♠ W ♣4 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
450 0.83 2.17 4♠ W +1 ♦9 9-Smith-Suddards vs 2-Harken-Harken
450 0.83 2.17 4♠ W +1 ♣4 7-Keen-McDuff vs 3-Duey-Hebner
|
2 |
♠J753
♥T6
♦Q632
♣A73
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 4♥ E -1 ♥2 9-Smith-Suddards vs 2-Harken-Harken
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ E ♣6 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
420 0.17 2.83 4♥ E ♣6 7-Keen-McDuff vs 3-Duey-Hebner
|
3 |
♠A85
♥AQ95
♦83
♣K965
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4/3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2/3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.17 0.83 4♥ E -1 ♠3 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 2.17 0.83 4♥ E -1 ♣J 7-Keen-McDuff vs 3-Duey-Hebner
120 0.17 2.83 2N W ♥3 9-Smith-Suddards vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
4 |
♠A832
♥T76
♦J83
♣JT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.17 0.83 3♥ S +1 ♣8 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
170 2.17 0.83 2♥ S +2 ♠Q 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Harken-Harken
140 0.17 2.83 3♥ S ♠Q 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Duey-Hebner
|
5 |
♠Q9864
♥K832
♦87
♣A7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.83 0.17 4♠ S +2 ♦A 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Harken-Harken
650 1.50 1.50 5♠ N ♦2 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Duey-Hebner
100 0.17 2.83 4♦* W -1 ♣A 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
6 |
♠9864
♥AJ8
♦Q2
♣A986
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 2♠ S +1 ♣K 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Duey-Hebner
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 ♦A 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Harken-Harken
100 0.17 2.83 4♥ S -2 ♣K 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠A87
♥J7
♦JT9872
♣AJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.17 0.83 3N S +1 ♠3 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
630 2.17 0.83 3N N +1 ♥3 2-Harken-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
90 0.17 2.83 2♦ N ♠K 9-Smith-Suddards vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
8 |
♠Q984
♥AQT63
♦63
♣74
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♠ 1/-NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠7/6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 1N E -2 ♦T 9-Smith-Suddards vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
50 1.50 1.50 2♣ W -1 ♠9 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
150 0.17 2.83 2N W +1 ♥6 2-Harken-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
9 |
♠Q75
♥K42
♦KQ54
♣942
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4/3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 2N E +1 ♠2 2-Harken-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
180 0.83 2.17 2N E +2 ♠5 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
180 0.83 2.17 1N E +3 ♦T 9-Smith-Suddards vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
10 |
♠J
♥973
♦AKJ432
♣T85
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♦ 4♥ ♣5/6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 3♥ S ♠4 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 2-Harken-Harken
100 1.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 ♠4 7-Keen-McDuff vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.17 2.83 4♥ S -2 ♠4 9-Smith-Suddards vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
11 |
♠KT8532
♥-
♦A9754
♣JT
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ -/1♠ ♣0 ♥0/2 ♠6/7 NT0 |
EW: 5/6♣ 5♥ 6NT ♦4/5 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 4♥ W ♠5 7-Keen-McDuff vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♦A 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 2-Harken-Harken
480 0.17 2.83 4♥ W +2 ♦A 9-Smith-Suddards vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
12 |
♠Q983
♥76
♦J4
♣KJ983
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2/3♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 2N W -1 ♦J 7-Keen-McDuff vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
120 1.50 1.50 2N E ♦A 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 2-Harken-Harken
400 0.17 2.83 3N W ♥7 9-Smith-Suddards vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
13 |
♠JT83
♥Q742
♦T92
♣64
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1♠ ♣7/6 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♣6 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Duey-Hebner
90 2.00 1.00 1N S ♠Q 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 9-Smith-Suddards
90 1.00 2.00 1N E ♦3 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 0.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♠5 2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Keen-McDuff
|
14 |
♠Q
♥AK8765
♦JT652
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♣ E -1 ♥3 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
130 2.00 1.00 4♣ E ♦A 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 9-Smith-Suddards
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ W ♥A 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Duey-Hebner
510 0.00 3.00 4♣* E ♦A 2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Keen-McDuff
|
15 |
♠4
♥Q9864
♦T43
♣JT96
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.50 0.50 3♦ E +1 ♥5 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
130 2.50 0.50 2♦ W +2 ♠4 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Duey-Hebner
150 1.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♠3 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 9-Smith-Suddards
180 0.00 3.00 1N E +3 ♠3 2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Keen-McDuff
|
16 |
♠Q65
♥AK542
♦K
♣K964
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 3♥ 5/1NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥3 ♠6 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 2.50 0.50 3N N +4 ♦9 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
520 2.50 0.50 3N N +4 ♣5 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
400 1.00 2.00 5♣ N ♠A 3-Duey-Hebner vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 0.00 3.00 5♣ N -1 ♠A 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 7-Keen-McDuff
|
17 |
♠Q
♥A9653
♦T642
♣AJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♣ S +1 ♦9 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥J 3-Duey-Hebner vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 1.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♦3 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
50 1.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♣8 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 7-Keen-McDuff
|
18 |
♠AT2
♥Q763
♦KQ863
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣6/5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -4 ♦T 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 7-Keen-McDuff
150 2.00 1.00 4♦ N +1 ♠Q 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
130 1.00 2.00 3♦ N +1 ♠5 3-Duey-Hebner vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 0.00 3.00 1♠ E +1 ♦5 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
19 |
♠K2
♥A3
♦A65432
♣K63
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 6♠ 6/2NT ♣5/4 ♥5/4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 1.00 5♠ S ♣Q 3-Duey-Hebner vs 2-Harken-Harken
450 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♣Q 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Smith-Suddards
450 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♣Q 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
420 0.00 3.00 4♠ S ♥K 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Keen-McDuff
|
20 |
♠T65
♥A83
♦AQT6
♣AJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ ♣5/4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠Q 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Smith-Suddards
150 1.00 2.00 4♦ S +1 ♠A 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Keen-McDuff
150 1.00 2.00 4♦ S +1 ♠A 3-Duey-Hebner vs 2-Harken-Harken
150 1.00 2.00 3♦ S +2 ♠A 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
21 |
♠T962
♥8765
♦92
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5/4 ♥3 ♠1 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 5♠ 3/1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ E ♦A 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Keen-McDuff
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ E ♦A 3-Duey-Hebner vs 2-Harken-Harken
450 0.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♦A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Smith-Suddards
450 0.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♦A 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
22 |
♠86
♥AJ743
♦QJ6
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥4 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
600 1.50 1.50 3N W ♥7 2-Harken-Harken vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
600 1.50 1.50 3N E ♥5 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Duey-Hebner
630 0.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♥4 7-Keen-McDuff vs 9-Smith-Suddards
|
23 |
♠54
♥AQ976
♦K985
♣AQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2/1NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠Q 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Duey-Hebner
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ N ♥3 7-Keen-McDuff vs 9-Smith-Suddards
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ N ♣2 2-Harken-Harken vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ N ♠T 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
|
24 |
♠AK63
♥64
♦Q9742
♣T6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3/2 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Duey-Hebner
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦3 2-Harken-Harken vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 0.50 2.50 3♥ W ♠A 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
140 0.50 2.50 3♥ W ♠A 7-Keen-McDuff vs 9-Smith-Suddards
|
25 |
♠T8
♥AKT852
♦7642
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -5 ♥Q 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 7-Keen-McDuff
400 2.00 1.00 3N S ♠3 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ N ♥9 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
90 0.00 3.00 2♣ S ♠3 3-Duey-Hebner vs 9-Smith-Suddards
|
26 |
♠K6
♥AT976
♦AK5
♣K84
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♠ ♣5/4 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1/2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♦K 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 ♥8 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
200 1.00 2.00 2♥ N -2 ♦6 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 7-Keen-McDuff
800 0.00 3.00 3♥* N -3 ♣A 3-Duey-Hebner vs 9-Smith-Suddards
|
27 |
♠J32
♥965
♦AJT64
♣K9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦J 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
80 1.00 2.00 1♠ W ♠J 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
80 1.00 2.00 1♠ W ♥6 10-Johnson-Reuben vs 7-Keen-McDuff
80 1.00 2.00 1♠ W ♦A 3-Duey-Hebner vs 9-Smith-Suddards
|