1 |
♠A
♥Q754
♦Q64
♣J9872
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6/5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ E ♦3 3-Bell-Ford vs 4-Smith-Kerner
140 3.50 0.50 1♠ E +2 ♣5 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 3-Burk-Cowen
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +2 ♦3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Haley-Gunter
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ E ♣6 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠KJ43
♥AJ8
♦75
♣8742
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Haley-Gunter
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.00 3.00 4♣ S -2 ♥T 3-Bell-Ford vs 4-Smith-Kerner
300 0.00 4.00 2N N -3 ♦6 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 3-Burk-Cowen
|
3 |
♠J8762
♥KQ
♦T
♣AJ654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N ♦7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N ♣2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Haley-Gunter
110 3.00 1.00 1♠ N +1 ♦8 3-Bell-Ford vs 4-Smith-Kerner
50 1.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♦8 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W ♦T 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 3-Burk-Cowen
|
4 |
♠T973
♥KQ43
♦K
♣KJ54
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6/5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5/6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -3 ♣9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
110 2.50 1.50 1♠ N +1 ♥A 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 3-Burk-Cowen
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ N ♣A 3-Bell-Ford vs 4-Smith-Kerner
70 1.00 3.00 1♦ E ♣9 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.00 4.00 1N S -1 ♦T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Haley-Gunter
|
5 |
♠KJ52
♥Q93
♦T
♣QT542
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 4.00 0.00 3N S +4 ♠3 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
690 3.00 1.00 3N S +3 ♣5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Payne-Perkins
660 1.00 3.00 3N S +2 ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
660 1.00 3.00 3N S +2 ♠3 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Smith-Kerner
660 1.00 3.00 3N S +2 ♣7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Haley-Gunter
|
6 |
♠KJ82
♥KJ9
♦J63
♣KJT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N W -4 ♥9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Haley-Gunter
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -2 ♦K 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
100 1.50 2.50 2♥ S -2 ♦A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Payne-Perkins
110 0.00 4.00 1♠ E +1 ♥T 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Smith-Kerner
|
7 |
♠AT652
♥A53
♦95
♣973
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5/4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N S ♦J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Haley-Gunter
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♦A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Payne-Perkins
120 1.50 2.50 2N S ♦6 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Smith-Kerner
120 1.50 2.50 1N S +1 ♦6 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠J975
♥KQ985
♦K5
♣KJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Haley-Gunter
50 3.00 1.00 1N W -1 ♥8 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Payne-Perkins
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
80 1.00 3.00 1♠ E ♣2 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
90 0.00 4.00 2♣ W ♥K 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Smith-Kerner
|
9 |
♠J93
♥J74
♦T63
♣T753
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3/2♥ 4♠ ♦6/5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ W ♦T 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ W ♦T 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♦6 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Payne-Perkins
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♦3 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 6-Haley-Gunter
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 ♦6 3-Bell-Ford vs 3-Burk-Cowen
|
10 |
♠J5432
♥-
♦JT42
♣JT93
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 6♥* E -3 ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ E ♠K 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 6-Haley-Gunter
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠A 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Payne-Perkins
790 0.00 4.00 4♥* E ♠A 3-Bell-Ford vs 3-Burk-Cowen
|
11 |
♠T92
♥AK8642
♦AJ
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N N ♥9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ S +2 ♥Q 3-Bell-Ford vs 3-Burk-Cowen
130 1.00 3.00 4♣ S ♦K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
130 1.00 3.00 3♣ S +1 ♥Q 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 6-Haley-Gunter
130 1.00 3.00 3♣ S +1 ♦4 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Payne-Perkins
|
12 |
♠KJ842
♥74
♦AQ2
♣865
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥3 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♦7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W ♠K 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Payne-Perkins
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♣8 3-Bell-Ford vs 3-Burk-Cowen
140 1.00 3.00 1♥ W +2 ♣5 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 6-Haley-Gunter
|
13 |
♠AK6
♥T9862
♦K43
♣K7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -3 ♥9 3-Bell-Ford vs 2-Payne-Perkins
300 3.50 0.50 2♠ W -3 ♥T 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Burk-Cowen
100 2.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 ♥5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Smith-Kerner
90 1.00 3.00 1N S ♠4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 1N S -2 ♠3 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
|
14 |
♠K98
♥Q42
♦KQ762
♣KJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♣2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Smith-Kerner
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N ♦J 3-Bell-Ford vs 2-Payne-Perkins
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ N +1 ♥5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Haley-Gunter
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♣5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Burk-Cowen
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♣2 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
|
15 |
♠QT5
♥Q52
♦A642
♣K87
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠6/5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♣ W +1 ♠5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Haley-Gunter
110 3.50 0.50 2♣ W +1 ♠5 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +2 ♣5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Smith-Kerner
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♦3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Burk-Cowen
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♦3 3-Bell-Ford vs 2-Payne-Perkins
|
16 |
♠AJ754
♥Q8
♦95
♣J864
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 ♥7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Burk-Cowen
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ N -2 ♣T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Smith-Kerner
100 2.50 1.50 1♠ N -2 ♣T 3-Bell-Ford vs 2-Payne-Perkins
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ E ♥3 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
120 0.00 4.00 1N W +1 ♥Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Haley-Gunter
|
17 |
♠A764
♥T842
♦A64
♣K5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S ♥K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Smith-Kerner
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Burk-Cowen
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -1 ♥K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Payne-Perkins
50 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -1 ♥K 3-Bell-Ford vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
|
18 |
♠K96
♥AK6
♦AK
♣AQJT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
2220 4.00 0.00 7N S ♥3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Smith-Kerner
1470 2.50 1.50 6N S +1 ♠4 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
1470 2.50 1.50 6N N +1 ♣9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Payne-Perkins
1440 1.00 3.00 6N N ♠8 3-Bell-Ford vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
720 0.00 4.00 5N S +2 ♠4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Burk-Cowen
|
19 |
♠53
♥T53
♦JT965
♣KJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ W +1 ♥T 3-Bell-Ford vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♦J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Payne-Perkins
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♦J 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♦6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Smith-Kerner
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♥T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Burk-Cowen
|
20 |
♠AQT8652
♥K7
♦Q95
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Burk-Cowen
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♣4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Payne-Perkins
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♦A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Smith-Kerner
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♦A 3-Bell-Ford vs 1-Raphael-Kelly
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 ♥J 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
21 |
♠AJ96
♥Q632
♦K83
♣T2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S ♦A 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 4-Smith-Kerner
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♥A 3-Bell-Ford vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♦A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Burk-Cowen
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ W ♣T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Payne-Perkins
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♦A 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Haley-Gunter
|
22 |
♠AKJ
♥A96
♦KT
♣KJ972
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6/5♦ 1/-♥ 3/2♠ 5NT ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Burk-Cowen
420 2.50 1.50 5♣ N +1 ♠6 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 4-Smith-Kerner
420 2.50 1.50 5♣ N +1 ♥J 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Haley-Gunter
300 1.00 3.00 3♥ E -3 ♠9 3-Bell-Ford vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.00 4.00 3♣ N +3 ♥J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Payne-Perkins
|
23 |
♠4
♥AJ975
♦K92
♣AK83
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 1/-♦ 6♥ 5♠ 3/2NT ♣7/6 ♦7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥0 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.00 1.00 5♠ S +1 ♣Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Payne-Perkins
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♣Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Burk-Cowen
680 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +2 ♦Q 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Haley-Gunter
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ S +1 ♥Q 3-Bell-Ford vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ S +1 ♣Q 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 4-Smith-Kerner
|
24 |
♠Q9765
♥2
♦T94
♣9652
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♠ ♣3 ♦1/2 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 5♥* W -2 ♠5 3-Bell-Ford vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
150 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -3 ♠8 5-Harken-Wilkinson vs 4-Smith-Kerner
200 2.00 2.00 3♣ S -4 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Payne-Perkins
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♦A 6-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Haley-Gunter
650 0.00 4.00 5♥* E ♦A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Burk-Cowen
|