1 |
♠J64
♥Q53
♦K86
♣AJ52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 6.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♠2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
460 4.00 2.00 3N S +2 ♠3 5-Smith-Kerner vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
460 4.00 2.00 3N S +2 ♠2 7-Harken-Winham vs 4-Cowen-Burk
460 4.00 2.00 3N S +2 ♦5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
430 2.00 4.00 3N S +1 ♠8 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
400 0.50 5.50 3N S ♠T 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
400 0.50 5.50 3N S ♠T 9-Benson-Lasser vs 8-Haley-Gunter
|
2 |
♠K6543
♥83
♦AT973
♣2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♣4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
50 4.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♠4 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
50 4.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♣2 5-Smith-Kerner vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
50 4.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♣2 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.50 4.50 3♥ E ♠J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 1.50 4.50 2♥ W +1 ♦7 9-Benson-Lasser vs 8-Haley-Gunter
430 0.00 6.00 3N W +1 ♠6 7-Harken-Winham vs 4-Cowen-Burk
|
3 |
♠AK8432
♥K97
♦85
♣AJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♥ 1/2♠ 3NT ♣3 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 6.00 0.00 5♣ S ♠Q 7-Harken-Winham vs 4-Cowen-Burk
300 5.00 1.00 2N E -3 ♣6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
80 4.00 2.00 1♠ N ♦2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 3.00 3.00 2♠ N -2 ♦3 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
150 1.50 4.50 2♠ S -3 ♦3 5-Smith-Kerner vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
150 1.50 4.50 2♠ N -3 ♦3 9-Benson-Lasser vs 8-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 6.00 3♠ N -4 ♦3 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
|
4 |
♠A72
♥A842
♦A4
♣KT84
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥6/5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ -/1♠ ♣2 ♦5/6 ♠6/7 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♠5 7-Harken-Winham vs 3-Keen-Ford
130 5.00 1.00 2♣ S +2 ♥T 9-Benson-Lasser vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
120 4.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♠T 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
90 3.00 3.00 1N N ♠5 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Payne-Perkins
90 2.00 4.00 1N W ♣4 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
150 1.00 5.00 1N W +2 ♣4 5-Smith-Kerner vs 8-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 6.00 1N N -2 ♦3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
|
5 |
♠JT63
♥A64
♦5
♣KJ964
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♥ ♦6 ♥7/6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 ♦5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
50 5.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 ♠J 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
90 3.00 3.00 1N E ♥5 9-Benson-Lasser vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
90 3.00 3.00 1N E ♦5 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
90 3.00 3.00 1N E ♦3 7-Harken-Winham vs 3-Keen-Ford
100 1.00 5.00 2♥ S -1 ♣A 5-Smith-Kerner vs 8-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 6.00 1N S -2 ♥7 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
6 |
♠K95
♥9872
♦AT8
♣JT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 6.00 0.00 3♥* E -3 ♠Q 5-Smith-Kerner vs 8-Haley-Gunter
400 5.00 1.00 3N S ♦4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
300 4.00 2.00 2♥ E -3 ♠Q 7-Harken-Winham vs 3-Keen-Ford
180 3.00 3.00 2N S +2 ♥4 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Payne-Perkins
150 2.00 4.00 1N S +2 ♥4 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
120 1.00 5.00 2N S ♥4 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
50 0.00 6.00 2♠ N -1 ♥K 9-Benson-Lasser vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
|
7 |
♠JT5
♥AJ75
♦K642
♣Q5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♦Q 7-Harken-Winham vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
110 2.50 3.50 3♣ W ♥5 9-Benson-Lasser vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.50 3.50 3♣ W ♦2 3-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Keen-Ford
110 2.50 3.50 2♣ W +1 ♠J 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 2.50 3.50 2♣ W +1 ♥5 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Cowen-Burk
110 2.50 3.50 2♣ W +1 ♦2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 8-Haley-Gunter
110 2.50 3.50 2♣ W +1 ♦2 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
|
8 |
♠T643
♥AQ4
♦K3
♣KJ43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4/5♦ -/2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♥5/8 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 3♠ E -4 ♣2 3-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Keen-Ford
140 5.00 1.00 3♥ S ♣A 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ E ♥J 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ E ♣8 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Cowen-Burk
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ E ♣8 9-Benson-Lasser vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
130 1.00 5.00 2♦ E +2 ♣Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 8-Haley-Gunter
150 0.00 6.00 3♥ S -3 ♦2 7-Harken-Winham vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
|
9 |
♠98
♥AJ8
♦AT84
♣AQJ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.50 0.50 3N N ♠2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 8-Haley-Gunter
400 5.50 0.50 3N N ♠2 3-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Keen-Ford
150 4.00 2.00 2N N +1 ♠2 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 3.00 3.00 2♣ N +1 ♦J 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Cowen-Burk
50 1.00 5.00 3N N -1 ♠2 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
50 1.00 5.00 3N N -1 ♠2 7-Harken-Winham vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
50 1.00 5.00 3N N -1 ♠2 9-Benson-Lasser vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
10 |
♠KJ5
♥K862
♦9
♣KJ842
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♦A 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
170 4.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♣A 7-Harken-Winham vs 1-Payne-Perkins
170 4.50 1.50 2♠ S +2 ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Cowen-Burk
170 4.50 1.50 2♠ S +2 ♦A 3-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 9-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
100 1.00 5.00 4♦ W -1 ♠K 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Keen-Ford
200 0.00 6.00 4♠ S -2 ♣A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
|
11 |
♠K986
♥Q2
♦AQ54
♣K64
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♥K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Cowen-Burk
170 5.50 0.50 2♠ S +2 ♥3 3-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
140 4.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♥4 7-Harken-Winham vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 3.00 3.00 2♠ S ♦6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
70 2.00 4.00 1♦ N ♠4 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
50 0.50 5.50 2♥ E -1 ♦J 9-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
50 0.50 5.50 2♥ E -1 ♦9 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Keen-Ford
|
12 |
♠J6
♥32
♦KT753
♣JT92
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 3/4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 6♠ W -2 ♦5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
200 5.00 1.00 3♠ W +2 ♣J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Cowen-Burk
450 2.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥3 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
450 2.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥3 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Keen-Ford
450 2.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♣J 7-Harken-Winham vs 1-Payne-Perkins
450 2.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♦6 3-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
480 0.00 6.00 4♠ E +2 ♣J 9-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
|
13 |
♠QJT
♥JT763
♦K875
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣2 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3/2 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 2♣ E -2 ♦A 9-Benson-Lasser vs 4-Cowen-Burk
140 4.50 1.50 3♠ S ♣6 5-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
140 4.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♣4 3-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 2.50 3.50 3♣ E ♠7 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Keen-Ford
110 2.50 3.50 3♣ E ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
130 0.50 5.50 3♣ W +1 ♠Q 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 8-Haley-Gunter
130 0.50 5.50 3♣ E +1 ♠3 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
|
14 |
♠Q2
♥J9
♦AKJ75
♣AKJ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5/6♦ 2♥ 2♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 4.00 2.00 6N S ♥3 5-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
990 4.00 2.00 6N S ♣T 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
990 4.00 2.00 6N S ♣T 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 8-Haley-Gunter
990 4.00 2.00 6N S ♣T 9-Benson-Lasser vs 4-Cowen-Burk
990 4.00 2.00 6N S ♣7 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Keen-Ford
490 0.50 5.50 5N S +1 ♣7 3-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Perkins
490 0.50 5.50 3N S +3 ♥3 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
|
15 |
♠AJT7
♥AQT
♦K743
♣65
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2/3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♦3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Keen-Ford
50 4.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♦6 5-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
50 4.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♣6 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
50 4.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♣5 3-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 2.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♦9 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 8-Haley-Gunter
420 0.50 5.50 4♥ W ♠7 9-Benson-Lasser vs 4-Cowen-Burk
420 0.50 5.50 4♥ E ♦9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
16 |
♠762
♥2
♦KT42
♣Q9652
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♥ 6♠ 6NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.50 1.50 5♥ W ♣2 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
650 4.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♦2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
650 4.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♦2 9-Benson-Lasser vs 3-Keen-Ford
650 4.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♣2 3-Harken-Tainty vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
680 2.00 4.00 4♥ W +2 ♦2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
710 1.00 5.00 4♥ W +3 ♠6 5-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Cowen-Burk
1430 0.00 6.00 6♥ W ♣5 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
17 |
♠QJT2
♥AQT5
♦986
♣K7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4/5♥ 1♠ 2/5NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 6.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
430 5.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣6 5-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Cowen-Burk
400 4.00 2.00 5♦ N ♥9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
180 3.00 3.00 1N S +3 ♠4 3-Harken-Tainty vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
150 2.00 4.00 3♦ N +2 ♥9 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 5.00 5♦ S -2 ♣4 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
150 0.00 6.00 3N S -3 ♥2 9-Benson-Lasser vs 3-Keen-Ford
|
18 |
♠2
♥K75
♦753
♣AKJ432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 4♦ S +1 ♠J 5-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Cowen-Burk
110 5.00 1.00 3♣ N ♠A 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
100 2.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♠5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
100 2.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♠5 3-Harken-Tainty vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
100 2.50 3.50 3♣ N -1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
100 2.50 3.50 3♣ N -1 ♠K 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.00 6.00 3N S -2 ♠J 9-Benson-Lasser vs 3-Keen-Ford
|
19 |
♠K8754
♥952
♦76
♣K96
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 1♥ ♣7/6 ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♠5 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
120 5.00 1.00 2N S ♦4 7-Harken-Winham vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
100 4.00 2.00 3♦ E -1 ♠9 3-Harken-Tainty vs 8-Haley-Gunter
90 3.00 3.00 2♦ E ♠T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 1.50 4.50 2N S -2 ♦4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Cowen-Burk
100 1.50 4.50 2N S -2 ♦4 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
130 0.00 6.00 3♦ E +1 ♠T 5-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Keen-Ford
|
20 |
♠Q9
♥AK9832
♦54
♣J72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♥A 3-Harken-Tainty vs 8-Haley-Gunter
100 5.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥A 5-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Keen-Ford
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ W ♥A 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.50 3.50 2♠ W +1 ♥A 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
140 2.50 3.50 2♠ W +1 ♥A 7-Harken-Winham vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
170 1.00 5.00 3♠ W +1 ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Cowen-Burk
620 0.00 6.00 4♠ W ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
21 |
♠T832
♥-
♦K92
♣AQ9764
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♣5 3-Harken-Tainty vs 8-Haley-Gunter
150 5.00 1.00 3♠ W -3 ♣A 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
200 3.50 2.50 3♥ W +2 ♠2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Payne-Perkins
200 3.50 2.50 2♥ E +3 ♣K 7-Harken-Winham vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
450 1.00 5.00 4♥ W +1 ♠T 5-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Keen-Ford
450 1.00 5.00 4♥ E +1 ♠6 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.00 5.00 4♥ E +1 ♣K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Cowen-Burk
|
22 |
♠T98
♥987532
♦K
♣K64
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4/5♥ ♣4/5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ 1/-NT ♦6/5 ♥2 NT7/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 6.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠J 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Cowen-Burk
400 5.00 1.00 1N E -4 ♦5 7-Harken-Winham vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 4.00 2.00 1N E -2 ♦7 3-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
180 2.50 3.50 2♦* S ♥4 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
180 2.50 3.50 2♦* S ♥4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
50 1.00 5.00 2♦ S -1 ♥4 5-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
150 0.00 6.00 2♦ S -3 ♥4 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 8-Haley-Gunter
|
23 |
♠Q542
♥T864
♦542
♣96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 4NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 ♣4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
140 4.50 1.50 3♥ E ♠9 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 8-Haley-Gunter
140 4.50 1.50 3♥ E ♠8 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
150 3.00 3.00 4♣ W +1 ♠J 3-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
170 2.00 4.00 3♥ E +1 ♥2 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Cowen-Burk
200 1.00 5.00 4♠ S -2 ♣4 7-Harken-Winham vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
600 0.00 6.00 5♣ E ♠A 5-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
|
24 |
♠8
♥Q876
♦KT
♣AKT975
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1/-NT ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT7/6 |
EW: 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 6.00 0.00 4♠ E -5 ♥4 2-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
150 5.00 1.00 4♥ W -3 ♣A 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Cowen-Burk
100 4.00 2.00 3N W -2 ♣A 7-Harken-Winham vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 4.00 4♥ W -1 ♣A 3-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
50 2.00 4.00 4♥ E -1 ♠4 5-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Millslagle-Kovats
50 2.00 4.00 2♥ E -1 ♣Q 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 8-Haley-Gunter
50 0.00 6.00 2♥ N -1 ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
|
25 |
♠A6
♥AT62
♦Q62
♣AK93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.50 1.50 3N N ♣5 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Keen-Ford
400 4.50 1.50 3N N ♣4 3-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
400 4.50 1.50 3N N ♣4 5-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Payne-Perkins
400 4.50 1.50 3N N ♣4 7-Harken-Winham vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
180 2.00 4.00 2N N +2 ♣4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 8-Haley-Gunter
90 1.00 5.00 2♣ N ♥3 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
50 0.00 6.00 3N N -1 ♣4 9-Benson-Lasser vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
|
26 |
♠J63
♥KJ842
♦T7
♣AK2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5/4 ♥6 NT5/4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3♦ W -1 ♣A 9-Benson-Lasser vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
80 5.00 1.00 1♠ S ♦3 5-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Payne-Perkins
120 3.50 2.50 2N W ♥4 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Keen-Ford
120 3.50 2.50 2N W ♥4 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
150 2.00 4.00 2N W +1 ♥4 3-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.00 5.00 2♥ N -2 ♦4 7-Harken-Winham vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
400 0.00 6.00 3♥ N -4 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 8-Haley-Gunter
|
27 |
♠A865
♥AJ95
♦T965
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 6.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠2 5-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Payne-Perkins
80 5.00 1.00 1♥ S ♦Q 3-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
PASS 3.00 3.00 Pass Out 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 8-Haley-Gunter
PASS 3.00 3.00 Pass Out 6-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Keen-Ford
PASS 3.00 3.00 Pass Out 7-Harken-Winham vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
90 0.50 5.50 2♣ E ♥6 9-Benson-Lasser vs 9-Raphael-Kelly
90 0.50 5.50 2♣ E ♣2 8-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
|