1 |
♠KT943
♥A8643
♦A
♣J9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.90 0.10 4♥ N +1 ♦J 9-Zinman-Karter vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
420 3.10 1.90 4♥ N ♣K 12-Suddards-Smith vs 1-McDuff-Keen
420 3.10 1.90 4♥ N ♣5 5-Burke-Spencer vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
230 1.30 3.70 3♥ N +3 ♣K 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 10-Harken-Murdock
110 0.10 4.90 3♦ W ♠4 8-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
|
2 |
♠Q7
♥A954
♦QT84
♣AK6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 7♦ 3♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦0 ♥4 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1440 4.90 0.10 6N N ♦5 9-Zinman-Karter vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
690 2.50 2.50 3N N +3 ♠4 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 10-Harken-Murdock
690 2.50 2.50 3N N +3 ♥Q 5-Burke-Spencer vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
690 2.50 2.50 3N N +3 ♥Q 12-Suddards-Smith vs 1-McDuff-Keen
200 0.10 4.90 6N N -2 ♠4 8-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
|
3 |
♠KJ943
♥9543
♦3
♣952
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.90 0.10 2♣ W +1 ♦2 5-Burke-Spencer vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
630 1.90 3.10 3N E +1 ♦J 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 10-Harken-Murdock
630 1.90 3.10 3N E +1 ♦J 9-Zinman-Karter vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
630 1.90 3.10 3N E +1 ♦J 12-Suddards-Smith vs 1-McDuff-Keen
630 1.90 3.10 3N E +1 ♦9 8-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
|
4 |
♠J6
♥AKT64
♦T963
♣Q3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.90 0.10 4♥ S +1 ♣J 1-McDuff-Keen vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ N ♣A 9-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Burke-Spencer
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ N ♣A 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ N ♣K 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 0.10 4.90 1♠ S +1 ♣4 12-Suddards-Smith vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
|
5 |
♠A943
♥AKQT5
♦T
♣Q95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.30 0.70 3♠ S ♣A 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
140 4.30 0.70 2♠ S +1 ♣A 12-Suddards-Smith vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
120 2.50 2.50 2N N ♣J 1-McDuff-Keen vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
100 1.30 3.70 4♣ W -2 ♥A 9-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Burke-Spencer
50 0.10 4.90 3♣ W -1 ♥A 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
6 |
♠QJ
♥T642
♦8432
♣432
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.90 0.10 4♥ W -3 ♦8 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 3.70 1.30 3N E -1 ♣7 12-Suddards-Smith vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
600 2.50 2.50 3N E ♦5 1-McDuff-Keen vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
630 1.30 3.70 3N E +1 ♣T 9-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Burke-Spencer
650 0.10 4.90 4♥ W +1 ♠Q 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
|
7 |
♠Q8
♥J7652
♦T4
♣AK74
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 6♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.10 1.90 4♠ E +2 ♥A 10-Harken-Murdock vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
680 3.10 1.90 4♠ E +2 ♦T 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 9-Zinman-Karter
680 3.10 1.90 4♠ E +2 ♣5 12-Suddards-Smith vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
680 3.10 1.90 4♠ E +2 ♣3 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Spencer
710 0.10 4.90 4♠ E +3 ♥A 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
|
8 |
♠K6
♥T8
♦K7643
♣QJ76
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ 1/-♠ 1NT ♥7/6 ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.70 1.30 3N W -1 ♦4 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 9-Zinman-Karter
50 3.70 1.30 1N W -1 ♦4 10-Harken-Murdock vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
50 3.70 1.30 2♠ W -1 ♣Q 12-Suddards-Smith vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
80 0.70 4.30 1♥ E ♠3 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
80 0.70 4.30 1♥ E ♦5 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Spencer
|
9 |
♠KT8754
♥A
♦JT8
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 6♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥2 ♠0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.30 0.70 4♠ N +2 ♦A 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Spencer
480 4.30 0.70 4♠ N +2 ♦K 12-Suddards-Smith vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
450 1.30 3.70 4♠ N +1 ♦A 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 9-Zinman-Karter
450 1.30 3.70 4♠ N +1 ♦A 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
450 1.30 3.70 4♠ N +1 ♦A 10-Harken-Murdock vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
|
10 |
♠6
♥KQ74
♦AJ42
♣Q975
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4/5 ♦3/4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.90 0.10 3N N +1 ♦T 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
120 3.70 1.30 1N N +1 ♥3 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
90 2.50 2.50 1N N ♥2 12-Suddards-Smith vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
100 0.70 4.30 3N N -1 ♦T 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 1-McDuff-Keen
100 0.70 4.30 3N N -1 ♦9 10-Harken-Murdock vs 9-Zinman-Karter
|
11 |
♠5432
♥K4
♦T764
♣T86
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 6♠ 5/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.90 0.10 4♠ W ♥4 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♥K 12-Suddards-Smith vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♦4 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♣A 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 1-McDuff-Keen
480 0.10 4.90 4♠ W +2 ♠2 10-Harken-Murdock vs 9-Zinman-Karter
|
12 |
♠KQ2
♥Q6
♦98
♣KJT864
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ ♣2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.90 0.10 3N S +1 ♦5 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
200 2.50 2.50 3♠ S +2 ♠J 10-Harken-Murdock vs 9-Zinman-Karter
200 2.50 2.50 3♠ S +2 ♥T 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 1-McDuff-Keen
200 2.50 2.50 3♠ S +2 ♥3 12-Suddards-Smith vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
110 0.10 4.90 2♠ S ♠7 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
13 |
♠J96
♥J52
♦63
♣J8632
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦0 ♥3 ♠4 NT0 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 4♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 6N W -1 ♥J 1-McDuff-Keen vs 10-Harken-Murdock
720 3.10 1.90 3N E +4 ♠3 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
720 3.10 1.90 3N E +4 ♥4 12-Suddards-Smith vs 5-Burke-Spencer
1390 1.30 3.70 6♦ W +1 ♣3 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 11-Rodgers-Feldstein
1470 0.10 4.90 6N W +1 ♥2 9-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
14 |
♠J8
♥AK
♦98632
♣AQ64
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠6/5 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 2.50 3♥ E +1 ♠3 9-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
170 2.50 2.50 2♥ E +2 ♠7 12-Suddards-Smith vs 5-Burke-Spencer
170 2.50 2.50 2♥ E +2 ♠3 1-McDuff-Keen vs 10-Harken-Murdock
170 2.50 2.50 2♥ E +2 ♦J 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
170 2.50 2.50 2♥ E +2 ♦J 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 11-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
15 |
♠84
♥KQT73
♦QT942
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥6 ♠0 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 7♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.90 0.10 4♠ E +2 ♥4 12-Suddards-Smith vs 5-Burke-Spencer
510 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +3 ♥J 1-McDuff-Keen vs 10-Harken-Murdock
510 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +3 ♥4 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
510 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +3 ♣4 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 11-Rodgers-Feldstein
980 0.10 4.90 6♠ E ♥9 9-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
16 |
♠7542
♥J5
♦T65
♣KQ53
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♠7 1-McDuff-Keen vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
100 3.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♠4 4-Avenmarg-Chase vs 9-Zinman-Karter
100 3.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♠2 12-Suddards-Smith vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
150 2.00 3.00 2N W +1 ♣3 8-Claussen-Burtch vs 11-Rodgers-Feldstein
180 1.00 4.00 1N W +3 ♣3 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 10-Harken-Murdock
600 0.00 5.00 3N W ♣3 5-Burke-Spencer vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
17 |
♠A2
♥AKT982
♦KQ9
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣2 ♠5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥2/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 5.00 0.00 4♥* N ♦A 4-Avenmarg-Chase vs 9-Zinman-Karter
140 4.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠6 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 10-Harken-Murdock
100 2.50 2.50 4♥ N -2 ♠T 1-McDuff-Keen vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
100 2.50 2.50 4♥ N -2 ♣5 8-Claussen-Burtch vs 11-Rodgers-Feldstein
150 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -3 ♣5 5-Burke-Spencer vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
300 0.00 5.00 4♥* N -2 ♦A 12-Suddards-Smith vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
18 |
♠AK6
♥KT9
♦97
♣AT972
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♣Q 5-Burke-Spencer vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 4.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♣Q 8-Claussen-Burtch vs 11-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 2.50 2.50 4♣ N -1 ♦4 4-Avenmarg-Chase vs 9-Zinman-Karter
100 2.50 2.50 4♣ N -1 ♦2 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 10-Harken-Murdock
110 1.00 4.00 3♦ W ♠A 12-Suddards-Smith vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 0.00 5.00 3♥ W ♠7 1-McDuff-Keen vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
|
19 |
♠A87
♥A2
♦J972
♣KQ98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3/4♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥K 12-Suddards-Smith vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
170 4.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♣A 5-Burke-Spencer vs 1-McDuff-Keen
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ S ♥K 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ S ♥K 10-Harken-Murdock vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ S ♥K 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 9-Zinman-Karter
100 0.00 5.00 3♥ W -1 ♠A 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
|
20 |
♠KT8743
♥Q9
♦985
♣AJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♦ 4♥ ♣5/6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ N ♣6 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♠2 5-Burke-Spencer vs 1-McDuff-Keen
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♦A 10-Harken-Murdock vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 1.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♦A 12-Suddards-Smith vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
100 1.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 ♦A 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 9-Zinman-Karter
680 0.00 5.00 4♥ E +2 ♠A 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
|
21 |
♠A643
♥QT
♦AJT
♣A953
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥6/5 ♠3 |
EW: 1♥ 3/4♠ ♣2 ♦6/5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 1.00 3N N ♠J 10-Harken-Murdock vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
600 4.00 1.00 5♣ S ♠K 12-Suddards-Smith vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
600 4.00 1.00 5♣ N ♠J 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 9-Zinman-Karter
150 1.50 3.50 4♠ E -3 ♣K 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
150 1.50 3.50 4♣ N +1 ♠K 5-Burke-Spencer vs 1-McDuff-Keen
130 0.00 5.00 3♣ N +1 ♦4 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
|
22 |
♠Q8542
♥KQ7
♦93
♣742
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♥ 3/4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.50 0.50 2♠ S +2 ♥A 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Burke-Spencer
170 4.50 0.50 2♠ S +2 ♣Q 12-Suddards-Smith vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
140 2.50 2.50 2♠ S +1 ♥A 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 9-Zinman-Karter
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ N ♣2 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-McDuff-Keen
100 1.00 4.00 3♦ E -1 ♣A 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
50 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -1 ♠J 10-Harken-Murdock vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
|
23 |
♠A53
♥K4
♦AJ873
♣J84
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 2/3♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♦K 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 9-Zinman-Karter
100 4.00 1.00 2♦ S -1 ♣A 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
140 1.50 3.50 3♥ W ♦A 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Burke-Spencer
140 1.50 3.50 2♥ W +1 ♣4 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-McDuff-Keen
140 1.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♦2 10-Harken-Murdock vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
140 1.50 3.50 1♥ E +2 ♦K 12-Suddards-Smith vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
|
24 |
♠JT964
♥A6
♦J87
♣Q52
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♥T 11-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-McDuff-Keen
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ W ♠J 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Burke-Spencer
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ W ♦7 10-Harken-Murdock vs 4-Avenmarg-Chase
170 1.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♠J 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 9-Zinman-Karter
170 1.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♠J 6-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
170 1.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♠J 12-Suddards-Smith vs 8-Claussen-Burtch
|
25 |
♠92
♥AJ
♦J4
♣KJ98432
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ -/1♥ ♣4 ♥6/7 ♠6 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.90 0.10 3N S +1 ♠3 8-Claussen-Burtch vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 3.10 1.90 3♣ N ♥4 4-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-McDuff-Keen
110 3.10 1.90 3♣ N ♦A 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 11-Rodgers-Feldstein
50 1.30 3.70 3♣ N -1 ♥6 5-Burke-Spencer vs 10-Harken-Murdock
100 0.10 4.90 3♣ N -2 ♥6 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
26 |
♠A72
♥8532
♦JT94
♣J9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2/1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 3N W -1 ♠2 4-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-McDuff-Keen
200 3.70 1.30 2♥ W +3 ♦J 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
630 1.90 3.10 3N W +1 ♦4 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 11-Rodgers-Feldstein
630 1.90 3.10 3N E +1 ♦J 5-Burke-Spencer vs 10-Harken-Murdock
650 0.10 4.90 4♥ W +1 ♣9 8-Claussen-Burtch vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
27 |
♠64
♥Q7
♦AT743
♣Q843
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2/1 ♥6 ♠4/3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.30 0.70 3♦ S +2 ♣A 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 11-Rodgers-Feldstein
150 4.30 0.70 2♦ S +3 ♣A 5-Burke-Spencer vs 10-Harken-Murdock
100 2.50 2.50 4♥ E -2 ♣J 4-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-McDuff-Keen
50 1.30 3.70 2♥ E -1 ♣J 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
150 0.10 4.90 4♠ S -3 ♣A 8-Claussen-Burtch vs 6-Wasserstrom-Smith
|