1 |
♠K98
♥9
♦A92
♣KQ8762
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 6♦ 3♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.90 0.10 3♠ E +2 ♣J 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 10-McDuff-Keen
420 3.10 1.90 4♠ E ♣J 5-Reuben-Burke vs 2-Suddards-Smith
420 3.10 1.90 4♠ E ♣J 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
450 1.30 3.70 4♠ E +1 ♣3 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
480 0.10 4.90 4♠ E +2 ♠7 9-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
|
2 |
♠A9876
♥Q9652
♦T
♣A4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.90 0.10 6N E -6 ♥A 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
100 3.70 1.30 3N E -2 ♥4 9-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
50 2.50 2.50 3N E -1 ♠K 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 1.30 3.70 3♣ E ♦9 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 10-McDuff-Keen
470 0.10 4.90 3♦* E ♥A 5-Reuben-Burke vs 2-Suddards-Smith
|
3 |
♠KJ4
♥QT6
♦AKQ76
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.30 0.70 4♠ W -2 ♦A 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 10-McDuff-Keen
200 4.30 0.70 3♠* W -1 ♦A 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 1.90 3.10 2♥ N ♦9 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
110 1.90 3.10 3♦ S ♥K 5-Reuben-Burke vs 2-Suddards-Smith
100 0.10 4.90 4♥ S -2 ♣3 9-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
|
4 |
♠-
♥K92
♦Q943
♣QJ6542
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 6♥ 2/3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3/2 ♥1 ♠5/4 NT2/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.70 1.30 3N S +2 ♠J 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Zinman-Karter
660 3.70 1.30 3N S +2 ♠J 9-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Reuben-Burke
660 3.70 1.30 3N S +2 ♠8 1-Chase-Avenmarg vs 8-Harken-Harken
640 1.30 3.70 5♣ N +2 ♠A 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
170 0.10 4.90 3♣ N +3 ♥7 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Suddards-Smith
|
5 |
♠Q32
♥-
♦AQ85
♣T98764
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥0 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 6♥ 4NT ♦5 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 4.30 0.70 4♥ W +3 ♠2 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
510 4.30 0.70 4♥ W +3 ♣T 1-Chase-Avenmarg vs 8-Harken-Harken
980 1.90 3.10 6♥ W ♦A 9-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Reuben-Burke
980 1.90 3.10 6♥ W ♦A 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Suddards-Smith
1010 0.10 4.90 6♥ E +1 ♣K 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Zinman-Karter
|
6 |
♠82
♥KQ5
♦KT42
♣A632
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.30 0.70 3N W -1 ♦2 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Suddards-Smith
100 4.30 0.70 4♠ W -1 ♠8 1-Chase-Avenmarg vs 8-Harken-Harken
170 2.50 2.50 2♠ W +2 ♥K 9-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Reuben-Burke
620 0.70 4.30 4♠ W ♥K 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Zinman-Karter
620 0.70 4.30 4♠ W ♥K 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
7 |
♠5
♥-
♦AJT7543
♣T9852
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ ♥1/3 ♠1/3 NT2/6 |
EW: 4♥ 3/4♠ 1NT ♣2/3 ♦2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
910 4.90 0.10 4♦* N +1 ♥J 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Zinman-Karter
750 3.70 1.30 5♦* N ♥J 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Reuben-Burke
100 2.50 2.50 5♥ W -1 ♦A 10-McDuff-Keen vs 8-Harken-Harken
170 1.30 3.70 2♥ W +2 ♦A 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
620 0.10 4.90 4♥ W ♦A 2-Suddards-Smith vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
8 |
♠QJ654
♥T93
♦J
♣AJ53
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4/3♦ 3♥ 1/-♠ 2NT ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 3N W -2 ♣3 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Zinman-Karter
50 3.70 1.30 3♦ W -1 ♥3 2-Suddards-Smith vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 2.50 2.50 3♠ N -2 ♦A 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Reuben-Burke
110 0.70 4.30 3♦ W ♠Q 10-McDuff-Keen vs 8-Harken-Harken
110 0.70 4.30 3♦ W ♠4 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
9 |
♠KQT2
♥J6
♦2
♣Q87642
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 3N W -1 ♥J 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Zinman-Karter
50 3.70 1.30 3♣ N -1 ♠5 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Reuben-Burke
110 2.50 2.50 2♦ E +1 ♥5 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
150 1.30 3.70 2N E +1 ♥4 2-Suddards-Smith vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
200 0.10 4.90 2N S -4 ♦Q 10-McDuff-Keen vs 8-Harken-Harken
|
10 |
♠8432
♥AKT8753
♦A
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.90 0.10 4♥ N ♦7 3-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
170 2.50 2.50 2♥ N +2 ♠5 2-Suddards-Smith vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
170 2.50 2.50 2♥ N +2 ♠5 10-McDuff-Keen vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
170 2.50 2.50 2♥ N +2 ♦7 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 0.10 4.90 5♥ N -1 ♠5 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
11 |
♠QT3
♥KQ54
♦QT6
♣K76
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2/1NT ♦6 ♠6/5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.90 0.10 2♥ W -3 ♣6 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 3.10 1.90 2N E -2 ♣3 10-McDuff-Keen vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 3.10 1.90 3♠ E -2 ♠4 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
PASS 1.30 3.70 Pass Out 2-Suddards-Smith vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
100 0.10 4.90 3♣ N -2 ♥7 3-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
|
12 |
♠K2
♥8532
♦642
♣AK86
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 4.90 0.10 1♠ E ♣4 10-McDuff-Keen vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
90 3.10 1.90 1N W ♦4 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
90 3.10 1.90 1N E ♠J 2-Suddards-Smith vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
110 1.30 3.70 2♥ W ♣A 3-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
120 0.10 4.90 1N W +1 ♣K 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
13 |
♠J543
♥T6
♦AKJ
♣AQ65
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 2♥ E -1 ♦4 1-Chase-Avenmarg vs 10-McDuff-Keen
90 2.50 2.50 1N N ♥A 9-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
90 2.50 2.50 1N N ♥8 3-Zinman-Karter vs 8-Harken-Harken
90 2.50 2.50 1N N ♥8 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Reuben-Burke
100 0.10 4.90 1N N -1 ♥Q 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
|
14 |
♠KJ4
♥K86
♦A96
♣QJ92
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 3N N -1 ♦4 1-Chase-Avenmarg vs 10-McDuff-Keen
100 3.70 1.30 2N N -2 ♦5 9-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
110 2.50 2.50 2♦ E +1 ♠T 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
200 0.70 4.30 3N N -4 ♦5 3-Zinman-Karter vs 8-Harken-Harken
200 0.70 4.30 3N N -4 ♦5 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Reuben-Burke
|
15 |
♠Q4
♥AK76
♦J9865
♣J9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠2 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.90 0.10 4♠ S +1 ♣3 3-Zinman-Karter vs 8-Harken-Harken
620 3.10 1.90 4♠ S ♣3 9-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
620 3.10 1.90 4♠ S ♣3 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Reuben-Burke
100 1.30 3.70 5♠ S -1 ♣3 1-Chase-Avenmarg vs 10-McDuff-Keen
130 0.10 4.90 4♣ E ♠A 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
|
16 |
♠4
♥T843
♦T753
♣A965
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 ♥3 2-Suddards-Smith vs 10-McDuff-Keen
100 3.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♠4 8-Harken-Harken vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
100 3.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♥3 1-Chase-Avenmarg vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
100 3.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♦3 5-Reuben-Burke vs 3-Zinman-Karter
620 0.50 4.50 4♠ W ♣A 4-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
620 0.50 4.50 4♠ W ♣A 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
17 |
♠98
♥Q
♦T8754
♣KJ953
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♠ 4NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣A 1-Chase-Avenmarg vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
50 4.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣A 4-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 4.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣A 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ E ♣A 5-Reuben-Burke vs 3-Zinman-Karter
200 1.00 4.00 2♠ E +3 ♦Q 8-Harken-Harken vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
420 0.00 5.00 4♠ E ♥8 2-Suddards-Smith vs 10-McDuff-Keen
|
18 |
♠AT95
♥T3
♦KJ4
♣5432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 1N E -1 ♥4 1-Chase-Avenmarg vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
90 2.50 2.50 1N E ♥4 4-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
90 2.50 2.50 1N E ♥4 5-Reuben-Burke vs 3-Zinman-Karter
90 2.50 2.50 1N E ♥4 8-Harken-Harken vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
90 2.50 2.50 1N E ♥4 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
120 0.00 5.00 1N E +1 ♥4 2-Suddards-Smith vs 10-McDuff-Keen
|
19 |
♠KJ952
♥A97
♦32
♣862
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 6♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 ♠5 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
150 4.00 1.00 3♠ N -3 ♣A 10-McDuff-Keen vs 3-Zinman-Karter
170 3.00 2.00 3♣ E +3 ♠3 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
180 2.00 3.00 1N E +3 ♠3 5-Reuben-Burke vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
630 1.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♠3 2-Suddards-Smith vs 8-Harken-Harken
650 0.00 5.00 4♥ E +1 ♦7 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
|
20 |
♠3
♥J9862
♦A9642
♣92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠3 |
EW: 3♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♥A 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
150 4.00 1.00 3♦ N +2 ♠7 2-Suddards-Smith vs 8-Harken-Harken
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ S ♥Q 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
100 1.50 3.50 4♠ E -1 ♥A 5-Reuben-Burke vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
100 1.50 3.50 4♠ E -1 ♥A 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
620 0.00 5.00 4♠ E ♥A 10-McDuff-Keen vs 3-Zinman-Karter
|
21 |
♠KJ
♥Q532
♦8
♣KQ6532
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♦6 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
600 4.00 1.00 5♣ N ♣A 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
150 2.50 2.50 3♣ N +2 ♠3 2-Suddards-Smith vs 8-Harken-Harken
150 2.50 2.50 2♣ N +3 ♥7 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
130 1.00 4.00 4♣ N ♦T 5-Reuben-Burke vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
100 0.00 5.00 5♣ N -1 ♠T 10-McDuff-Keen vs 3-Zinman-Karter
|
22 |
♠AQ8
♥QJ865
♦J82
♣T6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 4♠ ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♣A 3-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
430 4.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥2 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Suddards-Smith
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥T 10-McDuff-Keen vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ S ♣7 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Harken-Harken
50 1.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♥7 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
100 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -2 ♦5 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Reuben-Burke
|
23 |
♠QJT86
♥KJ93
♦J754
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ ♣3 ♦7/6 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT5/4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♠9 10-McDuff-Keen vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
200 4.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♣4 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Harken-Harken
200 4.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♣3 3-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 2.00 3.00 4N E -1 ♣4 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Suddards-Smith
110 1.00 4.00 2♣ W +1 ♠Q 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
600 0.00 5.00 3N E ♣4 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Reuben-Burke
|
24 |
♠JT98
♥86532
♦A5
♣T2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1/-NT ♥5/4 ♠4 NT7/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 3♣ W ♠J 10-McDuff-Keen vs 4-Wilkinson-Gunter
120 4.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♥4 3-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Wasserstrom-Smith
130 2.50 2.50 4♦ E ♥A 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Reuben-Burke
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ E +1 ♦T 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Harken-Harken
150 1.00 4.00 2♦ E +3 ♣4 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
180 0.00 5.00 2N E +2 ♥4 6-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Suddards-Smith
|
25 |
♠AKQT852
♥T8
♦T85
♣7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.30 0.70 3♠ N ♥A 2-Suddards-Smith vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
140 4.30 0.70 3♠ N ♥A 5-Reuben-Burke vs 10-McDuff-Keen
50 2.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 ♥A 4-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
100 1.30 3.70 3N N -2 ♣8 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Zinman-Karter
620 0.10 4.90 4♥ E ♠2 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
26 |
♠AK4
♥AJ8
♦98
♣AJT85
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 6♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.90 0.10 3N N +1 ♣4 2-Suddards-Smith vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
600 3.70 1.30 3N N ♣4 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Zinman-Karter
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 ♠2 4-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
110 1.30 3.70 3♦ S ♥3 5-Reuben-Burke vs 10-McDuff-Keen
100 0.10 4.90 3N N -1 ♣4 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
27 |
♠Q43
♥KQ9732
♦A9
♣74
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.90 0.10 3♦ S ♣T 2-Suddards-Smith vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
100 2.50 2.50 3♠ N -2 ♣A 5-Reuben-Burke vs 10-McDuff-Keen
100 2.50 2.50 3♦ S -2 ♣T 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Zinman-Karter
100 2.50 2.50 3♦ S -2 ♣2 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Rodgers-Feldstein
150 0.10 4.90 3♥ N -3 ♣A 4-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 1-Chase-Avenmarg
|