1 |
♠K732
♥A
♦A84
♣AK974
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 3♦ 1/-NT ♥6 ♠3 NT7/6 |
EW: 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 3♣ N ♠A 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 2.63 1.38 4♠* W -1 ♥A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Sterling-Keen
140 1.38 2.63 3♠ W ♣A 10-Zinman-Karter vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
420 0.13 3.88 4♠ W ♥A 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
2 |
♠J42
♥AJ
♦AK9
♣AJ532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
70 3.88 0.13 1♣ N ♠6 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Sterling-Keen
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♠6 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♦Q 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ W ♣A 10-Zinman-Karter vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
3 |
♠J6
♥942
♦KQJ65
♣A43
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.88 0.13 4♥ S ♠A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Sterling-Keen
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ N +1 ♥3 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ N +1 ♥3 10-Zinman-Karter vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 0.13 3.88 5♦ N -1 ♣J 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
4 |
♠Q92
♥J83
♦83
♣AT982
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.25 0.75 1N S +3 ♠7 1-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
180 3.25 0.75 1N N +3 ♠5 5-Sterling-Keen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
170 1.38 2.63 2♥ S +2 ♥2 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.13 3.88 2N N +1 ♦5 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Smith-Suddards
|
5 |
♠8642
♥K
♦QJT9873
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.88 0.13 2N W +2 ♦Q 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Smith-Suddards
510 1.38 2.63 4♥ E +3 ♦K 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
510 1.38 2.63 4♥ E +3 ♣K 5-Sterling-Keen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
510 1.38 2.63 4♥ E +3 ♣4 1-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
6 |
♠AJ97
♥K63
♦A
♣J9852
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 2♠ E -2 ♣A 5-Sterling-Keen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
170 2.63 1.38 3♥ S +1 ♦T 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Smith-Suddards
90 1.38 2.63 1N S ♦6 1-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ W ♥3 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠K5
♥KQJT4
♦54
♣KJT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2♥ N -1 ♦6 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Smith-Suddards
170 1.38 2.63 3♠ W +1 ♥K 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Sterling-Keen
170 1.38 2.63 3♠ W +1 ♥K 10-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Burke-Reuben
170 1.38 2.63 2♠ W +2 ♥K 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
8 |
♠J8742
♥3
♦Q63
♣AKQ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N S ♥Q 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Sterling-Keen
100 2.63 1.38 2♥ E -2 ♣A 10-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Burke-Reuben
150 0.75 3.25 3N S -3 ♥Q 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
150 0.75 3.25 2♥ S -3 ♦6 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Smith-Suddards
|
9 |
♠82
♥A
♦A54
♣QT98532
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3/4♦ ♥5 ♠3/4 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦3 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3♥ E -4 ♦K 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Smith-Suddards
110 2.63 1.38 3♦ S ♠A 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Sterling-Keen
90 1.38 2.63 2♦ S ♠A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 0.13 3.88 3♠ S -2 ♦2 10-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Burke-Reuben
|
10 |
♠98
♥A864
♦J9
♣AT965
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 1♠ E +2 ♥5 1-Burke-Reuben vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
170 2.63 1.38 3♠ E +1 ♥J 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
200 1.38 2.63 3♣ N -2 ♠A 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 4-Smith-Suddards
620 0.13 3.88 4♠ E ♥J 10-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
11 |
♠A74
♥752
♦J975
♣QT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 3N E -1 ♠8 10-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
50 3.25 0.75 4♠ W -1 ♥2 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
400 0.75 3.25 3N E ♥6 1-Burke-Reuben vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
400 0.75 3.25 3N E ♥6 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 4-Smith-Suddards
|
12 |
♠K94
♥A75
♦AQ653
♣43
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 7♦ 4♠ 6NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣1 ♦0 ♥6 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1390 3.88 0.13 6♦ N +1 ♥K 10-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
1370 2.63 1.38 6♦ N ♠2 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
690 1.38 2.63 3N N +3 ♥3 1-Burke-Reuben vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
640 0.13 3.88 5♦ S +2 ♥K 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 4-Smith-Suddards
|
13 |
♠Q
♥KJT65
♦K62
♣KT65
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦4/5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ N ♠2 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♥9 4-Smith-Suddards vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ E ♣Q 10-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +2 ♦7 1-Burke-Reuben vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♥9 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Sterling-Keen
|
14 |
♠72
♥AQT94
♦53
♣T873
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1/2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2♠ W -3 ♦5 1-Burke-Reuben vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
120 1.50 2.50 2N S ♣9 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Sterling-Keen
120 1.50 2.50 2N N ♣2 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
120 1.50 2.50 1N N +1 ♣2 4-Smith-Suddards vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
120 1.50 2.50 1N N +1 ♣2 10-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
15 |
♠Q76543
♥-
♦AJ9754
♣Q
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♣ E -2 ♠T 10-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 3.50 0.50 4♣* E -1 ♦K 4-Smith-Suddards vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 2.00 4♦ N -1 ♣A 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Sterling-Keen
130 1.00 3.00 4♣ E ♠T 1-Burke-Reuben vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♣7 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
|
16 |
♠AKT73
♥65
♦AQ4
♣432
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 4♦ 1♠ ♣6/7 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♥A 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 ♦7 5-Sterling-Keen vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
50 2.50 1.50 4♦ N -1 ♥K 10-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Smith-Suddards
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♠A 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Burke-Reuben
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +2 ♠5 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
17 |
♠KQT54
♥T
♦A
♣K76543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1/2NT ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠3 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Burke-Reuben
400 3.00 1.00 3N S ♥3 5-Sterling-Keen vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
50 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♥3 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♥2 10-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Smith-Suddards
150 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♥3 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
18 |
♠43
♥87543
♦J
♣87642
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 5♠ ♣3 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 3/-NT ♦4/3 ♠2 NT9/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3♥* E -2 ♦A 5-Sterling-Keen vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♥9 10-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Smith-Suddards
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E ♦A 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
200 0.50 3.50 5♠* S -1 ♥9 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Burke-Reuben
200 0.50 3.50 5♦ S -2 ♣A 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
19 |
♠T86
♥76
♦QJ8
♣AKJ43
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1/-♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6/5 ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -3 ♥A 10-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Sterling-Keen
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 ♥7 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
50 2.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♣7 1-Burke-Reuben vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -2 ♥8 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ W ♥7 4-Smith-Suddards vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
20 |
♠KQ73
♥AQJ93
♦75
♣Q7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♣A 10-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Sterling-Keen
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N ♥6 4-Smith-Suddards vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N ♣5 1-Burke-Reuben vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♣5 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -2 ♣5 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
21 |
♠JT82
♥J
♦KT976
♣T87
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦6 ♥0 ♠3/4 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 1♦ 7♥ 3♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ E ♥6 10-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Sterling-Keen
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♠7 1-Burke-Reuben vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♦5 4-Smith-Suddards vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
510 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +3 ♣3 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
1010 0.00 4.00 6♥ E +1 ♠7 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
22 |
♠T4
♥T72
♦AT874
♣Q52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 4/3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦Q 10-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +3 ♥A 5-Sterling-Keen vs 1-Burke-Reuben
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W ♣2 4-Smith-Suddards vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♦Q 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
23 |
♠A52
♥AJ4
♦AQJ
♣AK96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 7♦ 6♥ 2♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦0 ♥1 ♠5 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1390 4.00 0.00 6♦ S +1 ♥T 10-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
1370 3.00 1.00 6♦ S ♥T 5-Sterling-Keen vs 1-Burke-Reuben
660 1.50 2.50 3N N +2 ♠Q 4-Smith-Suddards vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
660 1.50 2.50 3N N +2 ♠Q 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ N ♠Q 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
24 |
♠AQ8753
♥AJ5
♦42
♣J8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 ♦T 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 ♣K 7-Dilfer-Wolfe vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 ♣K 10-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 ♦T 5-Sterling-Keen vs 1-Burke-Reuben
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -2 ♣A 4-Smith-Suddards vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
25 |
♠K985
♥K7
♦J8742
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4♠ S -2 ♥J 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Burke-Reuben
620 2.63 1.38 4♥ E ♠A 5-Sterling-Keen vs 4-Smith-Suddards
650 0.75 3.25 4♥ E +1 ♠A 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
650 0.75 3.25 4♥ E +1 ♠A 10-Zinman-Karter vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
|
26 |
♠T8
♥32
♦QT764
♣T742
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 6♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 4♦ S ♥A 10-Zinman-Karter vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
100 2.63 1.38 2♠ W -1 ♦T 5-Sterling-Keen vs 4-Smith-Suddards
500 1.38 2.63 5♦* S -2 ♦3 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
680 0.13 3.88 4♥ E +2 ♦A 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Burke-Reuben
|
27 |
♠T86
♥K73
♦A4
♣QT632
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 2♠ S +1 ♦K 8-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Burke-Reuben
50 2.63 1.38 4♦ W -1 ♠2 5-Sterling-Keen vs 4-Smith-Suddards
50 1.38 2.63 2♠ S -1 ♦K 10-Zinman-Karter vs 7-Dilfer-Wolfe
180 0.13 3.88 2N E +2 ♠3 3-Wilkinson-Gunter vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
|