1 |
♠T92
♥J92
♦J9
♣K8432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3/4♣ 6♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ E +1 ♠4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Burk-Cowen
190 3.00 1.00 4♦ E +3 ♥3 1-Benson-Lasser vs 1-Thomas-Payne
400 1.50 2.50 3N E ♠4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
400 1.50 2.50 5♦ E ♠4 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
490 0.00 4.00 3N E +3 ♥3 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
2 |
♠QJT7
♥K74
♦Q9
♣QT97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2/1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N S +2 ♥3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
140 3.00 1.00 1♠ N +2 ♦4 1-Benson-Lasser vs 1-Thomas-Payne
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ W -2 ♠Q 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
70 1.00 3.00 1♦ E ♣5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Burk-Cowen
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♦3 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
3 |
♠AT43
♥AJ76
♦742
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠4/3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2/3NT ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ W ♣9 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 ♣9 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
150 1.00 3.00 2N E +1 ♦6 1-Benson-Lasser vs 1-Thomas-Payne
630 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Burk-Cowen
|
4 |
♠K8754
♥K32
♦T96
♣65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3/2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1/-♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2/1♠ 3/2NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 2♦ W ♣6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Burk-Cowen
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ S -1 ♠J 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 ♠5 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♠5 1-Benson-Lasser vs 1-Thomas-Payne
150 0.00 4.00 2♦ W +3 ♣6 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
|
5 |
♠AKJT
♥AKJ
♦Q
♣AKJT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣2/3 ♥2/3 ♠1 NT2/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♣ N +3 ♣5 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ N +2 ♥4 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♦6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Thomas-Payne
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♦3 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Burk-Cowen
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♦3 1-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
|
6 |
♠A3
♥76
♦AKT763
♣643
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2NT ♣3 ♥4 ♠2 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 4♠ ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ W ♦A 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Burk-Cowen
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ E +1 ♦Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Thomas-Payne
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦Q 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♣J 1-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♣T 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
|
7 |
♠854
♥873
♦Q9432
♣Q6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠1/2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♠8 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Burk-Cowen
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♣Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Thomas-Payne
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E ♥Q 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E ♥Q 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♦3 1-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
|
8 |
♠42
♥AJ53
♦4
♣AKQT53
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3/2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ N ♦K 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Burk-Cowen
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ N ♠A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
110 2.50 1.50 2♣ N +1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Thomas-Payne
100 1.00 3.00 3♦ W -2 ♣A 1-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
50 0.00 4.00 3♣ N -1 ♦6 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
9 |
♠KQJ
♥KQJ
♦Q873
♣863
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♦J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ N ♣A 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Thomas-Payne
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ N -2 ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Burk-Cowen
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W ♦3 1-Benson-Lasser vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
800 0.00 4.00 5♦* N -4 ♥3 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
10 |
♠A7543
♥64
♦AQ7
♣A76
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♠K 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Thomas-Payne
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ E -2 ♦8 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Burk-Cowen
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♥K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ E -1 ♣8 1-Benson-Lasser vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ E -1 ♦4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
|
11 |
♠K973
♥KT5
♦K752
♣75
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -3 ♥4 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♦2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
150 2.00 2.00 2N E +1 ♣4 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Thomas-Payne
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♦2 1-Benson-Lasser vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♦2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Burk-Cowen
|
12 |
♠AQT82
♥A97
♦Q62
♣A6
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦2 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♥3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ N -1 ♣K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Burk-Cowen
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 ♦3 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Thomas-Payne
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ E ♠9 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 ♥3 1-Benson-Lasser vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
|
13 |
♠AT5
♥874
♦K73
♣AK76
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♦ S +1 ♠K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
130 3.00 1.00 4♦ S ♥5 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Burk-Cowen
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♥A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Thomas-Payne
80 1.00 3.00 1♥ E ♣3 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ E ♣3 1-Benson-Lasser vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
14 |
♠AJ
♥KQ95
♦32
♣J8754
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥1 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 3♣* E -3 ♠8 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♣A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Burk-Cowen
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Thomas-Payne
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ S +2 ♠7 1-Benson-Lasser vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
15 |
♠53
♥7
♦Q542
♣AJ9874
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦2/1 ♥2 ♠2 NT3/1 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ E ♦8 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Burk-Cowen
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ E +2 ♦8 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Thomas-Payne
200 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +3 ♣5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
230 1.00 3.00 3♥ E +3 ♦8 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
480 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +2 ♦8 1-Benson-Lasser vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
16 |
♠JT65
♥QJ3
♦QJT2
♣KQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♣ S +1 ♠K 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♣J 1-Benson-Lasser vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♦K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Burk-Cowen
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ N ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Thomas-Payne
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -4 ♠4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
|
17 |
♠KT654
♥7
♦KQJ43
♣AT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 1.50 5♠ N ♦A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦A 1-Benson-Lasser vs 2-Burk-Cowen
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦A 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Thomas-Payne
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♥5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
18 |
♠74
♥AK7543
♦97
♣J95
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥6 ♠5 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 1♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♦ E +3 ♥T 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
400 3.00 1.00 5♦ E ♥T 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Thomas-Payne
440 1.50 2.50 5♦ E +2 ♠Q 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
440 1.50 2.50 5♦ E +2 ♠Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
520 0.00 4.00 3N E +4 ♠5 1-Benson-Lasser vs 2-Burk-Cowen
|
19 |
♠JT3
♥-
♦Q92
♣QJ86543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2/3♠ ♦4 ♥0 NT0 |
EW: 2♦ 5♥ ♣2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 5♣ S ♦A 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
150 2.50 1.50 4♣ S +1 ♠Q 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Thomas-Payne
150 2.50 1.50 4♣ S +1 ♦A 1-Benson-Lasser vs 2-Burk-Cowen
50 1.00 3.00 5♣ S -1 ♦A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
100 0.00 4.00 5♣* S -1 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
20 |
♠QT543
♥QT
♦Q843
♣Q7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥5/3 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 1/-NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠4/3 NT7/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♥K 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Raphael
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ N ♥A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Dean-Millslagle
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♥A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Thomas-Payne
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E ♥3 1-Benson-Lasser vs 2-Burk-Cowen
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|