1 |
♠3
♥AQ64
♦K764
♣Q743
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.00 0.00 2N S ♦3 12-Wagener-Smith vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
100 4.00 1.00 1N W -2 ♣5 9-Walker-Murdock vs 7-Haley-Cole
50 3.00 2.00 2N N -1 ♥5 8-Hullman-Burk vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
100 2.00 3.00 2♦ N -2 ♣A 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 11-Benich-Oing
150 0.50 4.50 1N N -3 ♥5 5-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Brown-Cowen
150 0.50 4.50 2♦ N -3 ♠8 6-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
|
2 |
♠K76
♥754
♦7542
♣K72
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.00 0.00 2N W ♦7 8-Hullman-Burk vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
400 3.00 2.00 3N W ♥7 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 11-Benich-Oing
400 3.00 2.00 3N W ♥4 6-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
400 3.00 2.00 3N W ♣2 12-Wagener-Smith vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
430 0.50 4.50 3N W +1 ♦2 5-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Brown-Cowen
430 0.50 4.50 3N W +1 ♦2 9-Walker-Murdock vs 7-Haley-Cole
|
3 |
♠A
♥QJ963
♦T6
♣AT632
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♥Q 5-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Brown-Cowen
200 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♥2 6-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
130 3.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♠4 8-Hullman-Burk vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
110 2.00 3.00 2♣ N +1 ♠5 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 11-Benich-Oing
100 0.50 4.50 3♠ W -1 ♦T 9-Walker-Murdock vs 7-Haley-Cole
100 0.50 4.50 2♠ E -1 ♥2 12-Wagener-Smith vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
|
4 |
♠953
♥T97
♦A6
♣KQ843
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣4 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 8-Hullman-Burk
200 4.00 1.00 2♠ E +3 ♣J 12-Wagener-Smith vs 2-Brown-Cowen
630 2.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♣4 6-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
630 2.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♣4 11-Benich-Oing vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
650 1.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♥3 9-Walker-Murdock vs 5-Johnson-Keen
690 0.00 5.00 3N W +3 ♣4 7-Haley-Cole vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
|
5 |
♠A43
♥97
♦KQ532
♣K74
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2/3♥ 3♠ -/2NT ♣4 NT6/8 |
EW: 3♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.00 0.00 3N N ♠9 9-Walker-Murdock vs 5-Johnson-Keen
110 4.00 1.00 2♥ S ♦T 12-Wagener-Smith vs 2-Brown-Cowen
100 3.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦T 6-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
200 1.00 4.00 2N N -2 ♣3 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 8-Hullman-Burk
200 1.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♦T 11-Benich-Oing vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
200 1.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♦T 7-Haley-Cole vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
|
6 |
♠84
♥K762
♦Q84
♣Q532
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 2/1♣ 5♦ 2♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 5♠ E ♣7 7-Haley-Cole vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
680 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +2 ♠7 11-Benich-Oing vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
680 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +2 ♥5 6-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
680 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +2 ♦7 9-Walker-Murdock vs 5-Johnson-Keen
680 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +2 ♣7 12-Wagener-Smith vs 2-Brown-Cowen
1430 0.00 5.00 6♠ E ♥A 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 8-Hullman-Burk
|
7 |
♠97
♥Q84
♦T76
♣JT753
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦0 ♠2/1 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 5♠ 5NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 2♣ W -2 ♥4 7-Haley-Cole vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
100 4.00 1.00 6♦ E -1 ♥A 12-Wagener-Smith vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
200 3.00 2.00 1♠ W +4 ♥4 11-Benich-Oing vs 5-Johnson-Keen
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣J 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 8-Hullman-Burk
680 1.00 4.00 5♠ W +1 ♥Q 2-Brown-Cowen vs 9-Walker-Murdock
1370 0.00 5.00 6♦ E ♥A 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 6-Burke-Reuben
|
8 |
♠J65
♥AJ94
♦AJT65
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.50 0.50 3♦ N ♣A 2-Brown-Cowen vs 9-Walker-Murdock
110 4.50 0.50 3♦ N ♣A 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 8-Hullman-Burk
50 2.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♣J 12-Wagener-Smith vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
50 2.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♣A 7-Haley-Cole vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
130 1.00 4.00 4♣ E ♦2 11-Benich-Oing vs 5-Johnson-Keen
500 0.00 5.00 5♦* S -3 ♠9 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 6-Burke-Reuben
|
9 |
♠QJ86
♥3
♦9875
♣K876
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/1♠ ♦4 ♥4/3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.50 0.50 2♠ S ♥A 11-Benich-Oing vs 5-Johnson-Keen
110 4.50 0.50 2♠ S ♣A 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 8-Hullman-Burk
50 3.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♥T 7-Haley-Cole vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ W ♣6 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 6-Burke-Reuben
170 1.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♣6 2-Brown-Cowen vs 9-Walker-Murdock
200 0.00 5.00 2♥ W +3 ♣6 12-Wagener-Smith vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
|
10 |
♠K
♥KJ3
♦KQT963
♣Q86
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥3 ♠4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♦K 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 9-Walker-Murdock
100 2.50 2.50 3♠ W -1 ♦K 2-Brown-Cowen vs 7-Haley-Cole
100 2.50 2.50 3♠ W -1 ♦K 8-Hullman-Burk vs 5-Johnson-Keen
100 2.50 2.50 3♠ W -1 ♦K 11-Benich-Oing vs 6-Burke-Reuben
100 2.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 ♦A 12-Wagener-Smith vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
140 0.00 5.00 2♠ W +1 ♦K 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
|
11 |
♠KQT732
♥T3
♦Q9
♣J97
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♠5 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 9-Walker-Murdock
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♣K 2-Brown-Cowen vs 7-Haley-Cole
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♣3 11-Benich-Oing vs 6-Burke-Reuben
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ N ♣K 8-Hullman-Burk vs 5-Johnson-Keen
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ N ♣3 12-Wagener-Smith vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
50 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -1 ♣K 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
|
12 |
♠865
♥AK65
♦9764
♣54
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 2N W +1 ♥5 12-Wagener-Smith vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
180 4.00 1.00 1N W +3 ♥5 11-Benich-Oing vs 6-Burke-Reuben
270 3.00 2.00 2N W +5 ♥5 2-Brown-Cowen vs 7-Haley-Cole
400 1.50 3.50 3N W ♥A 8-Hullman-Burk vs 5-Johnson-Keen
400 1.50 3.50 3N W ♥5 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
460 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♦9 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 9-Walker-Murdock
|
13 |
♠Q9
♥AQ965
♦T9853
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ E ♣K 7-Haley-Cole vs 11-Benich-Oing
140 3.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♥T 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 8-Hullman-Burk
140 3.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♣K 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
140 3.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♣K 9-Walker-Murdock vs 6-Burke-Reuben
140 3.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♣K 12-Wagener-Smith vs 5-Johnson-Keen
170 0.00 5.00 3♠ E +1 ♣K 4-Osborn-Turnquist vs 2-Brown-Cowen
|
14 |
♠J765
♥QJ5
♦AK
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.50 0.50 3♣ N ♠A 4-Osborn-Turnquist vs 2-Brown-Cowen
110 4.50 0.50 3♣ N ♥A 7-Haley-Cole vs 11-Benich-Oing
100 3.00 2.00 3♦ W -2 ♠5 9-Walker-Murdock vs 6-Burke-Reuben
90 1.50 3.50 2♣ S ♥7 12-Wagener-Smith vs 5-Johnson-Keen
90 1.50 3.50 2♣ S ♥6 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 8-Hullman-Burk
50 0.00 5.00 3N N -1 ♠A 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
|
15 |
♠KQ873
♥T8
♦743
♣KT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 3♠ N ♥5 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 8-Hullman-Burk
50 3.50 1.50 3♥ W -1 ♠K 7-Haley-Cole vs 11-Benich-Oing
50 3.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 ♦J 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
100 2.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 ♥5 12-Wagener-Smith vs 5-Johnson-Keen
140 1.00 4.00 3♥ E ♣5 9-Walker-Murdock vs 6-Burke-Reuben
170 0.00 5.00 3♥ W +1 ♣K 4-Osborn-Turnquist vs 2-Brown-Cowen
|
16 |
♠Q964
♥J3
♦K42
♣KT82
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6/7 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 5.00 0.00 1N S ♣3 4-Osborn-Turnquist vs 9-Walker-Murdock
50 4.00 1.00 1N N -1 ♦5 8-Hullman-Burk vs 11-Benich-Oing
100 2.00 3.00 1N S -2 ♣3 12-Wagener-Smith vs 6-Burke-Reuben
100 2.00 3.00 1N N -2 ♠2 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 7-Haley-Cole
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ N -2 ♣5 2-Brown-Cowen vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
150 0.00 5.00 1N S -3 ♣3 5-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
|
17 |
♠JT984
♥K872
♦82
♣86
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 3♠ N +1 ♥Q 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 7-Haley-Cole
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ S ♦J 4-Osborn-Turnquist vs 9-Walker-Murdock
50 3.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♠J 5-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
140 1.00 4.00 3♥ W ♠J 2-Brown-Cowen vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
140 1.00 4.00 3♥ W ♠J 8-Hullman-Burk vs 11-Benich-Oing
140 1.00 4.00 3♥ W ♠J 12-Wagener-Smith vs 6-Burke-Reuben
|
18 |
♠QJ8
♥QJT93
♦82
♣T42
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2/1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 2♥* E -2 ♠A 5-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
150 4.00 1.00 3♥ E -3 ♠A 4-Osborn-Turnquist vs 9-Walker-Murdock
90 3.00 2.00 2♣ S ♠7 8-Hullman-Burk vs 11-Benich-Oing
100 1.50 3.50 2N S -1 ♣J 1-Wilkinson-Lasser vs 7-Haley-Cole
100 1.50 3.50 2♣ S -1 ♠3 12-Wagener-Smith vs 6-Burke-Reuben
200 0.00 5.00 3♦ S -2 ♥K 2-Brown-Cowen vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
|
19 |
♠Q32
♥AQ9
♦K4
♣AJ853
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5/4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5/4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♣7 11-Benich-Oing vs 9-Walker-Murdock
90 3.50 1.50 1N N ♠9 6-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
90 3.50 1.50 2♣ N ♦6 12-Wagener-Smith vs 7-Haley-Cole
50 1.50 3.50 1N N -1 ♠9 5-Johnson-Keen vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
50 1.50 3.50 1N N -1 ♦6 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
100 0.00 5.00 1N N -2 ♠9 2-Brown-Cowen vs 8-Hullman-Burk
|
20 |
♠AKQ
♥JT9875
♦2
♣AKT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♣5 6-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ N +1 ♣5 11-Benich-Oing vs 9-Walker-Murdock
140 2.50 2.50 1♥ N +2 ♠8 2-Brown-Cowen vs 8-Hullman-Burk
140 2.50 2.50 1♥ N +2 ♦Q 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
140 2.50 2.50 1♥ N +2 ♣4 5-Johnson-Keen vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
110 0.00 5.00 2♥ N ♣5 12-Wagener-Smith vs 7-Haley-Cole
|
21 |
♠Q94
♥J87
♦A865
♣Q94
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4/5 ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3/2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♦2 5-Johnson-Keen vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
120 4.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♥5 11-Benich-Oing vs 9-Walker-Murdock
150 3.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♥5 6-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
180 1.50 3.50 1N E +3 ♥5 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
180 1.50 3.50 1N E +3 ♥5 12-Wagener-Smith vs 7-Haley-Cole
200 0.00 5.00 2♥ S -2 ♦4 2-Brown-Cowen vs 8-Hullman-Burk
|
22 |
♠QT
♥AT753
♦Q5
♣KQT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦0 ♥4/5 ♠2/3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 7♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.00 0.00 3♦ E +1 ♥6 6-Burke-Reuben vs 2-Brown-Cowen
150 3.00 2.00 3♦ E +2 ♣J 11-Benich-Oing vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
150 3.00 2.00 3♦ E +2 ♣3 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
150 3.00 2.00 3♦ E +2 ♣3 12-Wagener-Smith vs 8-Hullman-Burk
190 1.00 4.00 3♦ E +4 ♥2 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 9-Walker-Murdock
200 0.00 5.00 3♠ E +2 ♥8 7-Haley-Cole vs 5-Johnson-Keen
|
23 |
♠K
♥AJ86
♦A983
♣AQ92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.50 0.50 3N S ♠4 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
600 4.50 0.50 3N S ♦2 11-Benich-Oing vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
150 3.00 2.00 1N N +2 ♥2 12-Wagener-Smith vs 8-Hullman-Burk
120 2.00 3.00 1N N +1 ♣7 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 9-Walker-Murdock
110 0.50 4.50 3♣ N ♥K 7-Haley-Cole vs 5-Johnson-Keen
110 0.50 4.50 2♣ N +1 ♥K 6-Burke-Reuben vs 2-Brown-Cowen
|
24 |
♠A7532
♥JT954
♦3
♣A4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥Q 3-Suddards-Llacera vs 9-Walker-Murdock
50 3.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦K 11-Benich-Oing vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
50 3.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣Q 6-Burke-Reuben vs 2-Brown-Cowen
50 3.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣Q 10-Hanson-Mazzei vs 4-Osborn-Turnquist
150 1.00 4.00 4♣ E +1 ♠K 12-Wagener-Smith vs 8-Hullman-Burk
400 0.00 5.00 5♣ E ♠K 7-Haley-Cole vs 5-Johnson-Keen
|
25 |
♠Q2
♥KQJT72
♦865
♣AT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠7 8-Hullman-Burk vs 6-Burke-Reuben
50 3.00 2.00 5♥ N -1 ♣Q 7-Haley-Cole vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
50 3.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♠5 2-Brown-Cowen vs 11-Benich-Oing
50 3.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♠7 12-Wagener-Smith vs 9-Walker-Murdock
150 1.00 4.00 5♥ N -3 ♠5 4-Osborn-Turnquist vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
620 0.00 5.00 4♠ E ♥A 5-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
|
26 |
♠KQ64
♥T
♦K7543
♣Q76
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3/2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 4♥ E -4 ♠7 4-Osborn-Turnquist vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
100 4.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 ♥T 12-Wagener-Smith vs 9-Walker-Murdock
100 2.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 ♦8 5-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
100 2.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 ♦8 2-Brown-Cowen vs 11-Benich-Oing
110 0.50 4.50 2♥ E ♣A 8-Hullman-Burk vs 6-Burke-Reuben
110 0.50 4.50 2♣ W +1 ♠K 7-Haley-Cole vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
|
27 |
♠T54
♥A43
♦KJ3
♣KT54
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 5.00 0.00 2♦ S ♦5 2-Brown-Cowen vs 11-Benich-Oing
80 4.00 1.00 1♥ W ♣4 8-Hullman-Burk vs 6-Burke-Reuben
110 2.50 2.50 2♥ W ♦3 12-Wagener-Smith vs 9-Walker-Murdock
110 2.50 2.50 1♥ W +1 ♣4 5-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Hanson-Mazzei
140 0.50 4.50 1♥ W +2 ♠T 4-Osborn-Turnquist vs 1-Wilkinson-Lasser
140 0.50 4.50 1♥ W +2 ♣4 7-Haley-Cole vs 3-Suddards-Llacera
|