1 |
♠K32
♥93
♦A96
♣87653
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 2N W -2 ♣5 8-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Harken-Harken
50 3.70 1.30 2♥ E -1 ♦2 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Smith-Keen
50 2.50 2.50 3♣ S -1 ♣A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 0.70 4.30 3♠ S -2 ♣K 6-Walker-Dau vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
100 0.70 4.30 3♣ S -2 ♥J 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 7-Burke-Reuben
|
2 |
♠AQ98
♥KT63
♦KJ862
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.90 0.10 2N N ♥8 6-Walker-Dau vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
100 3.10 1.90 3N N -1 ♥8 8-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Harken-Harken
100 3.10 1.90 2N N -1 ♥8 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 7-Burke-Reuben
200 1.30 3.70 2♦ N -2 ♦7 5-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
300 0.10 4.90 2N S -3 ♠7 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Smith-Keen
|
3 |
♠QJ2
♥Q54
♦K942
♣983
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.90 0.10 3♠ E -3 ♦A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 2.50 2.50 3♣ S ♠3 8-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Harken-Harken
110 2.50 2.50 3♣ S ♠3 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 7-Burke-Reuben
110 2.50 2.50 3♣ S ♠3 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Smith-Keen
50 0.10 4.90 3♣ S -1 ♠3 6-Walker-Dau vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
4 |
♠4
♥AQ643
♦Q94
♣9542
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ -/1♠ 1NT ♥4 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.90 0.10 4♠ E -4 ♥T 6-Walker-Dau vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.70 1.30 3N E -1 ♥2 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
600 1.90 3.10 3N W ♥4 1-Smith-Keen vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
600 1.90 3.10 3N W ♥4 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
630 0.10 4.90 3N W +1 ♠4 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
5 |
♠AQ97
♥62
♦QJT982
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.90 0.10 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 6-Walker-Dau vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.10 1.90 4♥ W -1 ♥8 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
50 3.10 1.90 3♥ W -1 ♦Q 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 1.30 3.70 2♥ W ♣T 1-Smith-Keen vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
140 0.10 4.90 2♥ W +1 ♣T 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
6 |
♠T76
♥852
♦984
♣J976
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦3 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 7/6♠ 7NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.90 0.10 4♠ W +2 ♥2 6-Walker-Dau vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
690 3.70 1.30 4N E +2 ♥K 1-Smith-Keen vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
1460 1.90 3.10 6♠ W +1 ♥5 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Harken
1460 1.90 3.10 6♠ W +1 ♥4 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
2210 0.10 4.90 7♠ W ♥2 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
7 |
♠K52
♥K
♦AQ873
♣7652
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.90 0.10 4♦ N +1 ♠Q 7-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Harken-Harken
130 3.70 1.30 3♦ S +1 ♣J 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Zinman-Karter
100 2.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♦K 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 0.70 4.30 3♠ W ♥K 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
140 0.70 4.30 3♠ E ♦5 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠A953
♥A874
♦A72
♣QT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥5/6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.30 0.70 3♠ S ♣2 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 4.30 0.70 2♠ S +1 ♥3 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ S ♣6 7-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Harken-Harken
50 1.30 3.70 3♠ S -1 ♣2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
100 0.10 4.90 4♠ S -2 ♠T 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
9 |
♠-
♥AKT98754
♦Q53
♣K4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.70 1.30 4♥ N -1 ♠K 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Zinman-Karter
50 3.70 1.30 4♥ N -1 ♦A 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
50 3.70 1.30 4♥ N -1 ♦A 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.30 3.70 4♥* N -1 ♦A 7-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Harken-Harken
300 0.10 4.90 5♥* N -2 ♠A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
|
10 |
♠765432
♥Q
♦8
♣JT875
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.70 1.30 3N W -2 ♥Q 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
200 3.70 1.30 3N E -2 ♥5 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Harken
200 3.70 1.30 4♦ E -2 ♣4 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Smith-Keen
100 1.30 3.70 4♦ E -1 ♣4 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Burke-Reuben
600 0.10 4.90 3N W ♣7 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Walker-Dau
|
11 |
♠JT6
♥T652
♦KJ9
♣JT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.90 0.10 2♥ N +1 ♣A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 3.70 1.30 2N E -2 ♥A 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Harken
90 1.90 3.10 1N W ♥2 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Smith-Keen
90 1.90 3.10 1N E ♥3 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Burke-Reuben
120 0.10 4.90 1N E +1 ♥3 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Walker-Dau
|
12 |
♠AQJ
♥J87
♦853
♣K652
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ -/1♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥6/7 |
EW: 3♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.90 0.10 4♠ S +1 ♣4 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
170 3.70 1.30 3♠ S +1 ♦A 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Walker-Dau
50 2.50 2.50 3♦ W -1 ♣2 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Harken
110 0.70 4.30 3♦ W ♣2 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Burke-Reuben
110 0.70 4.30 3♦ W ♣2 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Smith-Keen
|
13 |
♠AT94
♥J7
♦876
♣AT87
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ -/1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♥6/7 ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.90 0.10 2♥ W -2 ♦8 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
150 3.70 1.30 1N S +2 ♥6 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Walker-Dau
90 2.50 2.50 2♦ S ♣9 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
100 1.30 3.70 1N S -1 ♥6 7-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
300 0.10 4.90 3N S -3 ♥6 1-Smith-Keen vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
14 |
♠QT
♥AKT96
♦K2
♣K654
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1/-♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6/1NT ♦7/6 |
EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 4.90 0.10 6♥ N ♣7 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Walker-Dau
510 3.70 1.30 4♥ N +3 ♣7 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
490 2.50 2.50 3N N +3 ♦5 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
480 1.30 3.70 5♥ N +1 ♠3 1-Smith-Keen vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
450 0.10 4.90 4♥ N +1 ♣J 7-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
|
15 |
♠72
♥K64
♦KQ873
♣A93
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 3♥ W -1 ♦K 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
140 1.90 3.10 3♥ W ♠7 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
140 1.90 3.10 3♥ W ♦K 7-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
140 1.90 3.10 2♥ W +1 ♠7 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Walker-Dau
140 1.90 3.10 2♥ W +1 ♦K 1-Smith-Keen vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
16 |
♠AKQT
♥6
♦AQT8
♣KQ93
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.50 0.50 3♠ S ♥A 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
140 4.50 0.50 3♠ S ♥A 8-Avenmarg-Chase vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ S ♣6 1-Smith-Keen vs 7-Burke-Reuben
90 2.00 3.00 1♦ N +1 ♠J 5-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♣6 4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 0.00 5.00 2♥ W +1 ♠A 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Walker-Dau
|
17 |
♠T976
♥75
♦T9852
♣A6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1/-♣ 4/3♥ 1♠ 4/3NT ♣7/6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 5♥ E -1 ♦A 4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
50 4.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦A 8-Avenmarg-Chase vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
420 2.50 2.50 4♥ E ♦A 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
420 2.50 2.50 4♥ E ♣9 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Walker-Dau
450 0.50 4.50 4♥ E +1 ♦A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
450 0.50 4.50 4♥ E +1 ♣9 1-Smith-Keen vs 7-Burke-Reuben
|
18 |
♠KT7432
♥T6
♦T5
♣AK3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ 2/3NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♦7/6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.00 0.00 3N S ♥A 1-Smith-Keen vs 7-Burke-Reuben
110 4.00 1.00 3♣ S ♥A 8-Avenmarg-Chase vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♣6 4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♣6 5-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 3.00 4♣ S -1 ♥K 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
200 0.00 5.00 2♠ N -2 ♥4 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Walker-Dau
|
19 |
♠J
♥T753
♦K2
♣AT8763
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 2N W -1 ♠J 6-Walker-Dau vs 4-Harken-Harken
50 4.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 ♣8 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Smith-Keen
100 3.00 2.00 2♥ S -2 ♣9 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
150 1.00 4.00 4♥ S -3 ♠A 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
150 1.00 4.00 4♥ S -3 ♣9 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Burke-Reuben
150 1.00 4.00 3♥ S -3 ♣9 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
20 |
♠A632
♥AK87
♦T
♣AJ74
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♦K 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
650 3.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♦K 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Smith-Keen
650 3.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♦K 6-Walker-Dau vs 4-Harken-Harken
650 3.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♦K 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Burke-Reuben
200 0.50 4.50 3♥ S +2 ♦K 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.50 4.50 3♥ S +2 ♦K 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
21 |
♠Q
♥A6432
♦JT7
♣QJT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♥7/6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥J 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥7 6-Walker-Dau vs 4-Harken-Harken
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥7 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Burke-Reuben
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ E ♣7 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ E ♣7 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Smith-Keen
|
22 |
♠843
♥KT95
♦A864
♣92
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 5♠ 3/2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥8 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Harken-Harken
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ S ♥8 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ S ♥8 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Smith-Keen
200 1.50 3.50 2♠ S +3 ♥8 7-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Zinman-Karter
200 1.50 3.50 3♥ E -2 ♠A 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
140 0.00 5.00 3♠ S ♥8 6-Walker-Dau vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
23 |
♠AJ94
♥K
♦AJ654
♣K84
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.00 0.00 2♠ E -5 ♥A 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♦K 7-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Zinman-Karter
110 3.00 2.00 2♥ S ♠8 6-Walker-Dau vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 2.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♣2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Harken-Harken
200 0.50 4.50 3N N -2 ♠K 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Smith-Keen
200 0.50 4.50 2N N -2 ♣2 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
|
24 |
♠2
♥J7632
♦KQ85
♣Q93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♠ E ♣J 11-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Smith-Keen
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥5 12-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Avenmarg-Chase
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦8 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 3.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♥5 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Harken-Harken
170 1.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♥5 7-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Zinman-Karter
230 0.00 5.00 2♠ E +4 ♣2 6-Walker-Dau vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
25 |
♠K542
♥KT852
♦3
♣953
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 3♠ S -2 ♦A 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Keen
170 2.50 2.50 4♦ W +2 ♠2 5-Zinman-Karter vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
170 2.50 2.50 4♦ W +2 ♠2 7-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
170 2.50 2.50 4♦ W +2 ♠2 8-Avenmarg-Chase vs 6-Walker-Dau
620 0.10 4.90 5♦ W +1 ♠2 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
|
26 |
♠A6543
♥KQ972
♦9
♣52
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣4 ♠6 |
EW: 3/2♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.30 0.70 5♦ S ♠9 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Keen
600 4.30 0.70 5♦ S ♠8 8-Avenmarg-Chase vs 6-Walker-Dau
150 1.90 3.10 4♦ S +1 ♣J 7-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
150 1.90 3.10 3♦ S +2 ♥J 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
100 0.10 4.90 5♦ S -1 ♥A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
27 |
♠QT982
♥K953
♦7
♣T86
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.30 0.70 4♠ S ♦J 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Keen
420 4.30 0.70 4♠ S ♣3 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 11-Johnson-Osborn
50 1.30 3.70 5♦ W -1 ♠2 5-Zinman-Karter vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
50 1.30 3.70 5♦ W -1 ♠2 7-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.30 3.70 5♦ W -1 ♠2 8-Avenmarg-Chase vs 6-Walker-Dau
|