1 |
♠Q6
♥T96
♦AK7
♣JT642
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +3 ♣K 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♣7 1-Keen-Walker vs 1-Payne-Perkins
120 2.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♥8 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Tainty-Harken
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ N ♦J 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
50 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 ♥K 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
2 |
♠KJT96
♥J
♦842
♣AT83
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1/2♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -3 ♥J 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
150 3.00 1.00 2N W +1 ♠9 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 2-Cowen-Burk
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -2 ♦6 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
300 1.00 3.00 2♥ S -3 ♦A 1-Keen-Walker vs 1-Payne-Perkins
400 0.00 4.00 3N W ♠J 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Tainty-Harken
|
3 |
♠742
♥76
♦JT73
♣J943
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥1 ♠1/2 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 6♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ E ♣K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
120 3.00 1.00 2N W ♣3 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Tainty-Harken
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♣9 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W ♣3 1-Keen-Walker vs 1-Payne-Perkins
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♣3 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
4 |
♠86
♥K8532
♦643
♣Q73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦0 ♥4 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 7♦ 3♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 4.00 0.00 3♠ W +3 ♥3 1-Keen-Walker vs 1-Payne-Perkins
660 3.00 1.00 3N E +2 ♥Q 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Tainty-Harken
690 2.00 2.00 3N E +3 ♣2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
710 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +3 ♥Q 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
1430 0.00 4.00 6♠ W ♥3 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
5 |
♠A8
♥KQJ
♦73
♣AQ8762
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣1 ♦2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.50 1.50 5♣ N ♠Q 1-Keen-Walker vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
600 2.50 1.50 5♣ N ♠Q 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
600 2.50 1.50 5♣ N ♠2 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
600 2.50 1.50 5♣ N ♠2 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 0.00 4.00 5♠ W -2 ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Tainty-Harken
|
6 |
♠A542
♥Q73
♦JT
♣AQT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 5♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ S -2 ♦K 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
120 3.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♣4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Tainty-Harken
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ E +1 ♥9 1-Keen-Walker vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
130 1.50 2.50 2♦ E +2 ♣6 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 1-Payne-Perkins
150 0.00 4.00 1N W +2 ♠2 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
7 |
♠KJ8
♥T92
♦AT75
♣K98
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠3 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +3 ♦Q 1-Keen-Walker vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♥K 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♦Q 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ W ♣8 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Tainty-Harken
110 0.50 3.50 1♥ W +1 ♣9 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
|
8 |
♠KJ6
♥AK985
♦653
♣T7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3/4♣ 3/4♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ N ♣A 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 3.50 0.50 1♥ N +2 ♣A 1-Keen-Walker vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♣A 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♣A 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Tainty-Harken
|
9 |
♠AQ8
♥K95
♦9
♣AQJ654
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: -/1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5/6 ♦6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♦9 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 3-Tainty-Harken
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 ♥A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♣A 1-Keen-Walker vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
90 1.00 3.00 1♣ N +1 ♦2 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
50 0.00 4.00 3♣ N -1 ♠3 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
10 |
♠AKQJT97
♥Q7
♦Q
♣T86
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥1 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♠ N -1 ♥K 1-Keen-Walker vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
100 3.50 0.50 2♠ N -1 ♥K 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -2 ♥K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Burk
400 1.00 3.00 5♠ N -4 ♥K 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 3-Tainty-Harken
680 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +2 ♠A 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
|
11 |
♠84
♥KT9
♦AJ9743
♣92
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 3♦ S ♠K 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 3.50 0.50 2♦ N +1 ♣Q 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ E -2 ♦Q 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Burk
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 ♦A 1-Keen-Walker vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ W ♠8 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 3-Tainty-Harken
|
12 |
♠T9
♥KT875
♦53
♣8643
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S ♦K 1-Keen-Walker vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S ♦K 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♣5 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 1.00 3.00 3♦ E -1 ♥Q 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 3-Tainty-Harken
120 0.00 4.00 2N W ♠T 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
13 |
♠AJ854
♥J5
♦Q98
♣752
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 ♥J 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
120 2.50 1.50 2N W ♠5 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Payne-Perkins
120 2.50 1.50 1N W +1 ♠5 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
300 1.00 3.00 2♥ S -3 ♣A 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 2-Cowen-Burk
380 0.00 4.00 2♣* W +1 ♠A 1-Keen-Walker vs 3-Tainty-Harken
|
14 |
♠K43
♥J9543
♦87
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2/3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♥4 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
100 3.50 0.50 1N E -2 ♦4 1-Keen-Walker vs 3-Tainty-Harken
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 ♥8 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 2-Cowen-Burk
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ E ♥8 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
150 0.00 4.00 1N E +2 ♦4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
15 |
♠KQ5
♥42
♦KQ8
♣AT976
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♠3 1-Keen-Walker vs 3-Tainty-Harken
150 3.50 0.50 1N N +2 ♦4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Payne-Perkins
120 2.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♥7 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
90 1.00 3.00 1N N ♥7 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -1 ♥5 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
16 |
♠AT3
♥K87
♦K94
♣K843
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4/5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♠4 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 2-Cowen-Burk
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♦6 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ S ♦5 1-Keen-Walker vs 3-Tainty-Harken
50 0.50 3.50 1N N -1 ♣5 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 0.50 3.50 2♠ S -1 ♦5 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
|
17 |
♠62
♥JT3
♦9642
♣KQ95
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ W ♣K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ E ♠A 1-Keen-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♠A 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♠A 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♣3 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 3-Tainty-Harken
|
18 |
♠J864
♥86
♦A984
♣832
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N S ♣6 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 3.00 1.00 2♣ E -1 ♠K 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
110 1.50 2.50 1♠ W +1 ♥8 1-Keen-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ W ♣3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
180 0.00 4.00 2N W +2 ♥8 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 3-Tainty-Harken
|
19 |
♠A8743
♥K983
♦82
♣84
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4/5 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 1♠ N +1 ♣K 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 1-Payne-Perkins
90 3.00 1.00 1N S ♣3 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
50 2.00 2.00 1N S -1 ♦3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
90 1.00 3.00 1N E ♦5 1-Keen-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
150 0.00 4.00 1N S -3 ♠5 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 3-Tainty-Harken
|
20 |
♠KJ93
♥AQ5
♦K8
♣AQT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 7♦ 6♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦0 ♥1 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 4.00 0.00 3N N +4 ♣4 2-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Allen-Turnquist
690 2.50 1.50 3N N +3 ♦7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Beiers-Cirillo
690 2.50 1.50 3N N +3 ♣4 4-Clouse-Mayer vs 3-Tainty-Harken
660 1.00 3.00 3N N +2 ♣4 1-Keen-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ N +1 ♣4 3-Ficarrotta-White vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|