1 |
♠9875
♥K9653
♦AJ43
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ 5♥ 2NT ♣4 ♦7/6 ♠6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦6 4-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦5 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♥2 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ N ♣Q 6-Harken-Winham vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ S ♦5 1-Mount-Flint vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
2 |
♠94
♥KQ974
♦A94
♣QT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♦ 2♠ 3NT ♦7/6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♦5 6-Harken-Winham vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
630 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♣5 1-Mount-Flint vs 1-Payne-Perkins
600 1.00 3.00 3N S ♣5 4-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
600 1.00 3.00 3N S ♣5 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
600 1.00 3.00 3N S ♣3 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
|
3 |
♠K9742
♥T
♦K84
♣QJ43
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♥8 1-Mount-Flint vs 1-Payne-Perkins
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♣8 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ N ♥8 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ N ♣6 6-Harken-Winham vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ N +2 ♥8 4-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
4 |
♠J843
♥K94
♦54
♣T852
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
70 4.00 0.00 1♦ S ♣3 4-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ E ♥3 1-Mount-Flint vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ E ♥3 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
180 1.00 3.00 2N E +2 ♦A 6-Harken-Winham vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
600 0.00 4.00 3N E ♦7 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
|
5 |
♠KQT42
♥-
♦AT9653
♣AK
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♦ 7♠ 4/6NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 4.00 0.00 3N S +4 ♣5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Brown-Cowen
710 1.50 2.50 5♠ N +2 ♥3 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Payne-Perkins
710 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +3 ♠3 1-Mount-Flint vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
710 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +3 ♥8 4-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
710 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +3 ♥8 6-Harken-Winham vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
|
6 |
♠K4
♥J96432
♦QT98
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♥4 1-Mount-Flint vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.50 0.50 2N E -1 ♠3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Brown-Cowen
90 2.00 2.00 2♣ W ♥4 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ N -2 ♠5 6-Harken-Winham vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ E ♥7 4-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
|
7 |
♠T9
♥KQT
♦7532
♣AK52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 3.50 0.50 5♥ S +2 ♣J 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Payne-Perkins
710 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +3 ♣J 6-Harken-Winham vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
680 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +2 ♦Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Brown-Cowen
680 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +2 ♣J 4-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ S +1 ♥2 1-Mount-Flint vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠AQJT9
♥-
♦KJT92
♣QT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♣2 4-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
50 2.50 1.50 3N N -1 ♣2 1-Mount-Flint vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.50 1.50 3N N -1 ♣2 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 0.50 3.50 4N N -2 ♣2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Brown-Cowen
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -2 ♠5 6-Harken-Winham vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
|
9 |
♠764
♥A8
♦AKQ43
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥2 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
460 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♥9 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Payne-Perkins
400 1.50 2.50 3N N ♦6 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
400 1.50 2.50 3N N ♣J 6-Harken-Winham vs 2-Brown-Cowen
110 0.00 4.00 2♦ N +1 ♣J 1-Mount-Flint vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
|
10 |
♠AKJ74
♥765
♦J9
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠2/3 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣3 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
600 3.00 1.00 3N S ♣3 6-Harken-Winham vs 2-Brown-Cowen
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♥J 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
100 0.50 3.50 2N S -1 ♠2 1-Mount-Flint vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♣5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
11 |
♠AQT
♥AJ96
♦3
♣AQJ82
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6/5♦ 4/3♥ 1/-♠ 3/-NT ♠7/6 NT9/6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ S +1 ♠9 1-Mount-Flint vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
50 3.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♠6 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♠6 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♠4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♠3 6-Harken-Winham vs 2-Brown-Cowen
|
12 |
♠Q85
♥J764
♦KT84
♣QJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 5/4♣ 4/3♦ 2♥ 1/-♠ 2/1NT ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♠7 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
100 3.50 0.50 4♣ W -2 ♠5 1-Mount-Flint vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
50 1.00 3.00 3N W -1 ♥4 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.00 3.00 3N E -1 ♠2 6-Harken-Winham vs 2-Brown-Cowen
50 1.00 3.00 2♥ W -1 ♠5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
13 |
♠A7532
♥A95
♦92
♣Q52
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♦Q 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 2-Brown-Cowen
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♦Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♦6 6-Harken-Winham vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ S +1 ♦Q 4-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♦Q 1-Mount-Flint vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
|
14 |
♠-
♥AQ8653
♦T872
♣T93
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦2 ♥5 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 3/6♣ 3/5♦ 1/2♥ 5/6♠ 5/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♠* W -1 ♦T 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦2 6-Harken-Winham vs 1-Payne-Perkins
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♥A 4-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
460 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥6 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 2-Brown-Cowen
480 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +2 ♦T 1-Mount-Flint vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
|
15 |
♠K
♥KJ54
♦Q983
♣AT43
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦7 4-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
500 3.00 1.00 4♦* W -3 ♠K 1-Mount-Flint vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ W -3 ♠K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
300 1.00 3.00 3N N -3 ♦7 6-Harken-Winham vs 1-Payne-Perkins
500 0.00 4.00 4♥* N -2 ♦7 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 2-Brown-Cowen
|
16 |
♠AQ92
♥KQ976
♦83
♣J6
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♦ 1♥ ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 1N S +2 ♣3 6-Harken-Winham vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N ♥A 4-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N ♣T 1-Mount-Flint vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
100 0.13 3.88 3N S -2 ♣5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
17 |
♠J53
♥Q5
♦KJT86
♣Q82
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2/1 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♣5 4-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♦8 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 1-Payne-Perkins
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ W +1 ♦8 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ E +1 ♦7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♣5 1-Mount-Flint vs 2-Brown-Cowen
|
18 |
♠KQT76
♥J864
♦AQ
♣A2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 6♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +2 ♣J 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 1-Payne-Perkins
680 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 ♣K 1-Mount-Flint vs 2-Brown-Cowen
650 1.50 2.50 5♠ N ♦8 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥9 4-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
100 0.00 4.00 6♠ N -1 ♥5 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
|
19 |
♠KQ8
♥T72
♦A73
♣AKQ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 1N N ♥8 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 1-Payne-Perkins
90 3.50 0.50 1♣ N +1 ♥K 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
70 2.00 2.00 1♣ N ♥K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W ♣K 1-Mount-Flint vs 2-Brown-Cowen
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♣A 4-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
|
20 |
♠854
♥9653
♦K72
♣K54
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2/1 ♦3/2 ♥2 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 ♠A 4-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 ♥A 1-Mount-Flint vs 2-Brown-Cowen
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 ♥A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
130 1.00 3.00 4♣ E ♠A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♥A 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
21 |
♠T63
♥K5
♦JT74
♣J862
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♠2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♠2 6-Harken-Winham vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♥4 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
90 0.50 3.50 1N S ♠A 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
90 0.50 3.50 1N S ♠2 4-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Brown-Cowen
|
22 |
♠863
♥Q87542
♦7
♣KQ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦9 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♦A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♦A 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♦8 4-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Brown-Cowen
150 0.00 4.00 4♦ W +1 ♠3 6-Harken-Winham vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
23 |
♠874
♥9876
♦QJ2
♣K64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣7 4-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Brown-Cowen
600 2.50 1.50 3N S ♣7 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
600 2.50 1.50 3N S ♣7 6-Harken-Winham vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.50 3.50 5N S -2 ♣7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
200 0.50 3.50 5♦ N -2 ♠6 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
|
24 |
♠AJ965
♥T9762
♦K
♣J6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 ♠T 6-Harken-Winham vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ E ♠2 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Beiers-Boyle
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ E +1 ♠2 4-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Brown-Cowen
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ E +2 ♥A 3-Walker-Ficarrotta vs 5-Allen-Turnquist
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♥6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Wasserstrom-Harken
|