1 |
♠A3
♥J5
♦T754
♣T9842
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥4/3 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 1♥ S +3 ♦2 5-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Payne-Perkins
150 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -3 ♥J 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
50 2.00 2.00 3♦ E -1 ♦3 3-Harken-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ W ♥J 4-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Burk
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ E ♦3 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
|
2 |
♠Q3
♥J8762
♦KJT75
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ N +2 ♣2 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♣5 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♣5 3-Harken-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♥A 4-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Burk
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♦A 5-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Payne-Perkins
|
3 |
♠KQ2
♥AT
♦Q952
♣AJT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♥2 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N ♦T 3-Harken-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ N -1 ♦T 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ N -1 ♣K 4-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -2 ♣5 5-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Payne-Perkins
|
4 |
♠9843
♥QT7
♦QT65
♣A5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♦ W -2 ♠9 4-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 3.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 ♣A 5-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Payne-Perkins
100 2.00 2.00 2♣ S -1 ♦3 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
200 1.00 3.00 2N N -2 ♦2 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
380 0.00 4.00 2♦* W +1 ♣A 3-Harken-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
5 |
♠AJ54
♥J9
♦K963
♣K62
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♠ N +2 ♣7 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ N ♣7 4-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♥6 3-Harken-Walker vs 4-Payne-Perkins
100 1.50 2.50 2♦ N -1 ♣T 5-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
300 0.00 4.00 2N N -3 ♦5 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
6 |
♠K763
♥763
♦KQT
♣AK4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5/4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♠4 5-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
120 3.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♠4 4-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
100 2.00 2.00 2♣ E -1 ♥Q 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
90 1.00 3.00 1N N ♠4 3-Harken-Walker vs 4-Payne-Perkins
100 0.00 4.00 1N N -2 ♠Q 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠82
♥KQ7542
♦643
♣T2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 ♥T 5-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ E ♥T 3-Harken-Walker vs 4-Payne-Perkins
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ E ♥T 4-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ E ♥8 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
130 0.00 4.00 2♦ E +2 ♥T 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
8 |
♠K632
♥AKQ943
♦-
♣K95
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♥ 6♠ ♣5/4 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2♦ ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +3 ♠T 4-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ S +2 ♣4 5-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ S +2 ♣2 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
480 1.50 2.50 5♥ N +1 ♠T 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
480 1.50 2.50 5♥ N +1 ♦K 3-Harken-Walker vs 4-Payne-Perkins
|
9 |
♠JT96
♥K
♦A862
♣AQ63
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: -/1♣ 4/5♦ 4/5♥ 4NT ♣6/7 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♥ W -1 ♠J 4-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ W ♠J 5-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Burk
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♠J 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♠J 3-Harken-Walker vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♦A 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 4-Payne-Perkins
|
10 |
♠JT6
♥A8532
♦Q9
♣KT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4/5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♦5 4-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N ♣2 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♠K 5-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♥A 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 4-Payne-Perkins
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ N -1 ♣6 3-Harken-Walker vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
|
11 |
♠AQ32
♥AQJ8
♦KT84
♣Q
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♦A 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 4-Payne-Perkins
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ N +1 ♠J 4-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ N +2 ♠J 3-Harken-Walker vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ N +2 ♠J 5-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Burk
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ N +1 ♠J 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
|
12 |
♠76
♥QT74
♦JT65
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♣T 3-Harken-Walker vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
50 3.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♠8 4-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E ♣T 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 4-Payne-Perkins
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +2 ♥8 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +2 ♣T 5-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
13 |
♠AJT963
♥-
♦J72
♣A742
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -4 ♣K 3-Harken-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ N ♦3 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ W ♠A 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ W ♠A 5-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 ♦3 4-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Payne-Perkins
|
14 |
♠JT987
♥4
♦AKT4
♣Q42
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♦7/6 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ E ♦A 4-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Payne-Perkins
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ W ♦A 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ W ♦A 3-Harken-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ W ♦A 5-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ W ♦K 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
|
15 |
♠A642
♥3
♦53
♣KQJT53
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2♦ E -3 ♣9 4-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Payne-Perkins
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ W -2 ♦5 3-Harken-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ W -2 ♣K 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
50 0.50 3.50 3♥ W -1 ♣K 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.50 3.50 2♥ W -1 ♣K 5-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
|
16 |
♠KT84
♥A98
♦QJ87
♣J9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1/-♠ ♣3 ♥2 ♠7/6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 5♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠5 4-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Payne-Perkins
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♣2 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♠5 3-Harken-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♣5 5-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♣2 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
17 |
♠AQ862
♥A84
♦532
♣53
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♥6/7 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♦ 1♠ 2NT ♦7/6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♠ S +2 ♥2 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Payne-Perkins
50 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♥3 4-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
50 2.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♥3 5-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
90 1.00 3.00 1N E ♦4 3-Harken-Walker vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♥3 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
18 |
♠KJ6
♥J54
♦JT5
♣Q965
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 2♥ W +3 ♦J 4-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
200 3.50 0.50 2♥ E +3 ♠6 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Payne-Perkins
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♠6 5-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♦5 3-Harken-Walker vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
480 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +2 ♠6 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
19 |
♠85
♥QJ854
♦T7654
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦5/4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣J 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Payne-Perkins
200 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣J 3-Harken-Walker vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ W -1 ♣J 4-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ W -1 ♣J 5-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♣J 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
20 |
♠AJ95
♥5
♦JT974
♣QT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥6 3-Harken-Walker vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ E ♦8 5-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ E ♦5 4-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wilkinson-Lasser
150 1.00 3.00 2N E +1 ♥6 1-Reiss-Marchegiani vs 2-Cowen-Burk
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -2 ♣8 2-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Payne-Perkins
|