1 |
♠J932
♥54
♦K975
♣765
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥1 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 6♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ E +2 ♣K 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ E ♣K 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Smith-Smith
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♣K 3-Keen-Walker vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♣K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wagener-Smith
480 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +2 ♣K 5-Keay-Cooper vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
|
2 |
♠KT532
♥K975
♦J4
♣Q6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3/2♥ 3/2♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♥Q 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♥4 5-Keay-Cooper vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♦3 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wagener-Smith
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E ♦3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Smith-Smith
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♣4 3-Keen-Walker vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
|
3 |
♠T98
♥AT87
♦A75
♣J76
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦6/5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S ♦3 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wagener-Smith
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♦J 3-Keen-Walker vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♦9 5-Keay-Cooper vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -2 ♦J 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Smith-Smith
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -2 ♦3 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
4 |
♠AQJ54
♥Q87
♦J653
♣J
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♣A 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♣A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Smith-Smith
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♣A 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wagener-Smith
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ S +2 ♣T 5-Keay-Cooper vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♣T 3-Keen-Walker vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
|
5 |
♠Q87
♥K52
♦JT94
♣A32
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.88 0.13 3N N +3 ♣4 5-Keay-Cooper vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
660 2.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♠6 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Smith-Smith
660 2.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♣4 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wagener-Smith
630 0.13 3.88 3N S +1 ♥6 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
6 |
♠6
♥AQ72
♦J76
♣AJ542
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ 5NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♠6 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Wagener-Smith
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♥A 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♥2 5-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Smith-Smith
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♦6 3-Keen-Walker vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +2 ♦7 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
|
7 |
♠JT82
♥986
♦AQJ84
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 7♠ 6NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4/3 ♥5 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 4.00 0.00 6♠ S +1 ♥3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Wagener-Smith
1430 3.00 1.00 6♠ S ♥3 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
710 2.00 2.00 5♠ S +2 ♥3 5-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Smith-Smith
100 0.50 3.50 6N S -1 ♥3 3-Keen-Walker vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
100 0.50 3.50 6♠ S -1 ♥3 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
|
8 |
♠QT94
♥AQ4
♦T4
♣T972
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♦T 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 2.50 1.50 4♦ S -2 ♠A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Wagener-Smith
100 2.50 1.50 3♦* S -1 ♣4 3-Keen-Walker vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♦T 5-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Smith-Smith
800 0.00 4.00 5♦* S -4 ♥6 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
|
9 |
♠AT84
♥Q754
♦J984
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3/2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♦3 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ S ♣3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Wagener-Smith
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ S +1 ♣3 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
50 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♥3 5-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Smith-Smith
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♠5 3-Keen-Walker vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
|
10 |
♠85
♥AJ97643
♦9854
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4/5♠ 4/1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ W ♥A 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
640 3.00 1.00 5♣ E +2 ♥2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Wagener-Smith
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♦9 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
1370 1.00 3.00 6♣ E ♦A 3-Keen-Walker vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
1460 0.00 4.00 6♠ W +1 ♥A 5-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Smith-Smith
|
11 |
♠JT62
♥T
♦JT75
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠6/5 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 6♥ 1♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 ♣7 3-Keen-Walker vs 3-Smith-Smith
480 3.00 1.00 4♥ E +2 ♣7 5-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Wagener-Smith
980 1.00 3.00 6♥ E ♣7 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
980 1.00 3.00 6♥ E ♣7 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
980 1.00 3.00 6♥ E ♣7 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
|
12 |
♠Q2
♥AQJ
♦954
♣J9872
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 4♦ S ♠5 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
130 3.50 0.50 3♦ S +1 ♠5 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ S ♠J 5-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Wagener-Smith
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ S ♥7 3-Keen-Walker vs 3-Smith-Smith
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E ♣A 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
|
13 |
♠953
♥J
♦AK9853
♣KJT
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3/4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N S ♣5 3-Keen-Walker vs 3-Smith-Smith
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ N ♠4 5-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Wagener-Smith
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥5 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
200 0.50 3.50 3N S -2 ♣2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
200 0.50 3.50 2N S -2 ♠6 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
|
14 |
♠942
♥64
♦AQ862
♣J87
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ W ♣8 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ E ♦K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ E ♦K 5-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Wagener-Smith
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +2 ♣3 3-Keen-Walker vs 3-Smith-Smith
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +3 ♣K 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
|
15 |
♠AQT5
♥AQT962
♦74
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2/3♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠4/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♥J 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
50 3.50 0.50 5♣ W -1 ♥T 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
130 1.50 2.50 4♣ W ♥A 3-Keen-Walker vs 3-Smith-Smith
130 1.50 2.50 4♣ W ♥A 5-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Wagener-Smith
400 0.00 4.00 5♣ W ♥A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
16 |
♠KQ5
♥Q73
♦QJT
♣9543
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1/2 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♠5 3-Keen-Walker vs 2-Wagener-Smith
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦8 2-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
100 2.50 1.50 5♦ W -1 ♠K 5-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ W ♠K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ W +2 ♣3 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 3-Smith-Smith
|
17 |
♠Q87
♥Q7
♦T632
♣AK94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♦Q 5-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♣2 3-Keen-Walker vs 2-Wagener-Smith
50 2.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 ♣A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ S -1 ♠3 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
100 0.00 4.00 2♦ S -2 ♣J 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 3-Smith-Smith
|
18 |
♠KJ98
♥JT6
♦84
♣JT74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥6 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 2♠ 5/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 5♠ W -3 ♥J 2-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ E +2 ♥A 3-Keen-Walker vs 2-Wagener-Smith
400 2.00 2.00 5♦ E ♥K 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 3-Smith-Smith
460 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♥K 5-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
490 0.00 4.00 3N W +3 ♣4 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
|
19 |
♠QJ5432
♥J3
♦A9
♣A74
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♦ W +1 ♥J 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 3-Smith-Smith
200 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -4 ♥4 2-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
600 2.00 2.00 5♦ W ♥J 5-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦7 3-Keen-Walker vs 2-Wagener-Smith
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♠4 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
|
20 |
♠QJ3
♥8654
♦KJ75
♣J7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -4 ♣5 2-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
110 3.00 1.00 2♣ S +1 ♦T 5-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 ♦A 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
100 1.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 ♣J 3-Keen-Walker vs 2-Wagener-Smith
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E ♥A 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 3-Smith-Smith
|
21 |
♠JT7
♥2
♦543
♣KQJT74
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT5/6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Smith-Smith
50 3.00 1.00 1N W -1 ♣K 3-Keen-Walker vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 ♠8 5-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E ♦A 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 2-Wagener-Smith
800 0.00 4.00 4♣* N -3 ♦T 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
|
22 |
♠Q97
♥JT4
♦QJT97
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 5♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 7N E -1 ♥2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
100 3.50 0.50 5N E -1 ♥3 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Smith-Smith
630 2.00 2.00 4N E ♥2 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 2-Wagener-Smith
660 0.50 3.50 4N E +1 ♥8 3-Keen-Walker vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
660 0.50 3.50 4N E +1 ♥8 5-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
|
23 |
♠K7
♥Q874
♦A986
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 ♦2 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 2-Wagener-Smith
90 3.00 1.00 1N N ♠J 5-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
100 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♠J 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E ♦7 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Smith-Smith
200 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -2 ♠A 3-Keen-Walker vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
24 |
♠QJ8
♥Q3
♦AJ7652
♣KQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♦Q 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ N ♥7 5-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♠5 3-Keen-Walker vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ N -1 ♠9 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 2-Wagener-Smith
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ N -1 ♠9 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Smith-Smith
|
25 |
♠52
♥KQJT6
♦A982
♣A5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5/4 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♣6 3-Keen-Walker vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
150 3.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♠9 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Hubbell-Ray
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ N +2 ♦T 5-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Henderson-Wasserstrom
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ N +1 ♣7 1-Hasey-Oldden vs 2-Wagener-Smith
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♠A 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Smith-Smith
|