| 1 |
♠AK95
♥A5
♦Q4
♣A8752
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 1♦ -/2NT
♥4 ♠6 NT6/8 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N N ♥J 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Haley-Cole
50 3.00 1.00 1N N -1 ♥J 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 2.00 2.00 4♣ N -2 ♥J 3-Stone-Spencer vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ W ♠A 5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ E ♣T 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
| 2 |
♠KJ92
♥T976
♦T
♣9532
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
| EW: 5♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.00 1.00 5♥ E +1 ♠4 3-Stone-Spencer vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
480 3.00 1.00 5♥ E +1 ♣A 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Haley-Cole
480 3.00 1.00 4♥ E +2 ♠8 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
980 0.50 3.50 6♥ E ♣A 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
980 0.50 3.50 6♥ E ♣A 5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
| 3 |
♠KQ5
♥KJ94
♦QT875
♣8
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ 1/2NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 5♥* E -2 ♣A 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
300 2.50 1.50 3N W -3 ♦7 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
300 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -3 ♣A 5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
200 1.00 3.00 4♥ E -2 ♦6 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Haley-Cole
100 0.00 4.00 4♠* N -1 ♦A 3-Stone-Spencer vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
|
| 4 |
♠76
♥KT
♦AQT87
♣AQT2
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: -/1♥ 1♠
♣3 ♦5/6 ♥6/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♥2 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
120 3.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♥2 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Haley-Cole
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ N ♠5 3-Stone-Spencer vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
110 1.50 2.50 2♣ N +1 ♠Q 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 0.00 4.00 3♣ N -1 ♠5 5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
| 5 |
♠KJT83
♥J96
♦Q
♣JT97
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♥ 6♠ 5NT ♣6 ♦6 |
| EW: 1/-♦ ♣6 ♦7/6 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♣2 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Haley-Cole
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣3 3-Stone-Spencer vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S ♥3 5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S ♦5 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 1♥ S +4 ♠2 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
| 6 |
♠752
♥QT54
♦KQ95
♣A8
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣4/3 ♦3 ♥4 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠* S -1 ♠4 3-Stone-Spencer vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ E ♠J 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
600 2.00 2.00 3N W ♦5 5-Harken-Harken vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
660 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥4 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
1090 0.00 4.00 2N* W +2 ♦5 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 1-Haley-Cole
|
| 7 |
♠AJ8764
♥64
♦J
♣K852
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♥7 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 1-Haley-Cole
680 3.00 1.00 5♠ S +1 ♥9 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
660 2.00 2.00 3N S +2 ♥7 5-Harken-Harken vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♦8 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♦2 3-Stone-Spencer vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
| 8 |
♠J72
♥J876
♦A754
♣K6
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♦ 6♠ 6NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N W +1 ♦4 5-Harken-Harken vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♦7 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 1-Haley-Cole
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♦A 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♣J 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♣J 3-Stone-Spencer vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
| 9 |
♠T43
♥AK642
♦A6
♣632
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♥J 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♦3 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
150 2.00 2.00 3♣ S +2 ♠K 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 1-Haley-Cole
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♥A 5-Harken-Harken vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -1 ♠7 3-Stone-Spencer vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
| 10 |
♠KQ64
♥653
♦AJ7
♣KT7
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♠ 3/4NT ♦5 ♥6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♦3 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 1-Haley-Cole
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♦3 5-Harken-Harken vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♥A 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ N +1 ♦3 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♥2 3-Stone-Spencer vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
| 11 |
♠AKJ2
♥AK95
♦A3
♣QT9
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♥6 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 1-Haley-Cole
490 3.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♥6 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
460 1.00 3.00 3N N +2 ♥8 3-Stone-Spencer vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
460 1.00 3.00 3N N +2 ♥6 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
460 1.00 3.00 3N N +2 ♥6 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
|
| 12 |
♠K63
♥Q76
♦T62
♣A754
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ 6/5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 4♥* W -4 ♠K 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
680 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♣6 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♣9 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 1-Haley-Cole
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♣3 3-Stone-Spencer vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ S ♥5 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
| 13 |
♠KQ943
♥875
♦QT5
♣74
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♥Q 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +2 ♥A 3-Stone-Spencer vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
150 2.00 2.00 2N S +1 ♦3 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ S ♣Q 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ S +1 ♥A 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 1-Haley-Cole
|
| 14 |
♠Q64
♥7
♦AQ8542
♣A72
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -5 ♠K 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ S ♠2 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
120 2.00 2.00 2N N ♦J 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♠2 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 1-Haley-Cole
100 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -2 ♥A 3-Stone-Spencer vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
| 15 |
♠JT743
♥JT2
♦K64
♣J9
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N ♣K 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♠2 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ S +1 ♠2 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ W ♦4 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 1-Haley-Cole
110 0.00 4.00 2♣ W +1 ♦4 3-Stone-Spencer vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
| 16 |
♠KT82
♥T9
♦8753
♣A94
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 1/-♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ E +1 ♥6 3-Stone-Spencer vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
150 3.00 1.00 1N W +2 ♦3 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Haley-Cole
600 1.00 3.00 3N W ♦8 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
600 1.00 3.00 3N W ♦8 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
600 1.00 3.00 3N W ♦8 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
| 17 |
♠J963
♥QJ63
♦KQ2
♣AT
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣J 3-Stone-Spencer vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ S ♠4 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ S ♦9 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Haley-Cole
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠A 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♦T 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
| 18 |
♠K62
♥KQT7532
♦Q5
♣J
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♣A 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♣A 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Haley-Cole
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ W -1 ♣J 3-Stone-Spencer vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
50 1.50 2.50 4♦ E -1 ♥A 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♠A 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
| 19 |
♠T974
♥AKQ93
♦965
♣8
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N S ♣Q 3-Stone-Spencer vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
150 3.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♣Q 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Haley-Cole
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 ♥2 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦K 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
50 0.50 3.50 3♦ S -1 ♣A 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
| 20 |
♠KT84
♥Q76
♦J9
♣KQJ6
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S ♥A 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S ♥A 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S ♥A 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Haley-Cole
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ N ♥A 3-Stone-Spencer vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ W -1 ♣K 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
| 21 |
♠K82
♥AKJ9
♦J95
♣J97
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠6 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
630 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠4 3-Stone-Spencer vs 1-Haley-Cole
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♦3 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
600 0.50 3.50 3N S ♠4 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
600 0.50 3.50 3N S ♠4 5-Harken-Harken vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
|
| 22 |
♠T9863
♥A72
♦Q94
♣A2
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♦A 3-Stone-Spencer vs 1-Haley-Cole
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 ♦A 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N ♦A 5-Harken-Harken vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
PASS 0.50 3.50 Pass Out 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
PASS 0.50 3.50 Pass Out 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
| 23 |
♠QT73
♥92
♦J952
♣A63
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ ♦6/5 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♥A 5-Harken-Harken vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S ♣K 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S ♣K 3-Stone-Spencer vs 1-Haley-Cole
100 0.50 3.50 3♣ W -1 ♥9 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 0.50 3.50 3♣ W -1 ♥2 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
| 24 |
♠2
♥K43
♦AT76
♣KT532
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -4 ♥3 3-Stone-Spencer vs 1-Haley-Cole
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♦5 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♣J 5-Harken-Harken vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -2 ♠K 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -2 ♦2 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
| 25 |
♠KT9853
♥AK7
♦QT
♣Q6
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1/-NT
♦6 ♥5 NT7/6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -4 ♠2 1-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Rodgers-Feldstein
300 3.00 1.00 2N E -3 ♠8 2-Kuhlmann-Keen vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 ♥3 4-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 ♣A 5-Harken-Harken vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 ♥3 3-Stone-Spencer vs 1-Haley-Cole
|