1 |
♠KT42
♥A9
♦Q63
♣T532
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 3N W -2 ♠2 9-Harken-Harken vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 2.50 2.50 3N W -1 ♦2 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
50 2.50 2.50 3N E -1 ♥6 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Wesolowski-Lasser
50 2.50 2.50 3♦ W -1 ♣5 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
120 0.10 4.90 2N E ♥6 8-Haley-Cole vs 4-Spencer-Stone
|
2 |
♠J6
♥K2
♦A932
♣Q9532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1/-♠ 1/-NT ♥6/5 ♠7/6 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.90 0.10 4♥ E -4 ♠K 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
150 3.70 1.30 4♥ E -3 ♣7 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
100 1.90 3.10 4♥ E -2 ♦7 8-Haley-Cole vs 4-Spencer-Stone
100 1.90 3.10 3♥ E -2 ♠K 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Wesolowski-Lasser
50 0.10 4.90 3♥ E -1 ♠K 9-Harken-Harken vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
3 |
♠4
♥64
♦AQ87
♣T97532
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.30 0.70 4♦ S -1 ♥K 9-Harken-Harken vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 4.30 0.70 3♦ S -1 ♥K 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
100 2.50 2.50 3♦ S -2 ♥K 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
170 1.30 3.70 2♥ W +2 ♠4 8-Haley-Cole vs 4-Spencer-Stone
620 0.10 4.90 4♥ E ♣A 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Wesolowski-Lasser
|
4 |
♠T84
♥AJT63
♦T94
♣AQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5/6♥ 1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.90 0.10 4♥ N +1 ♠K 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Spencer-Stone
170 3.70 1.30 3♥ N +1 ♣9 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 8-Haley-Cole
130 1.90 3.10 4♦ S ♠9 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Zinman-Karter
130 1.90 3.10 2♦ S +2 ♠9 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 0.10 4.90 4♥ N -1 ♠K 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Wesolowski-Lasser
|
5 |
♠KT9843
♥K7
♦986
♣83
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.70 1.30 4♠ N +2 ♥6 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Zinman-Karter
680 3.70 1.30 4♠ N +2 ♥6 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Wesolowski-Lasser
680 3.70 1.30 4♠ N +2 ♣J 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Spencer-Stone
650 0.70 4.30 4♠ N +1 ♦3 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 8-Haley-Cole
650 0.70 4.30 4♠ N +1 ♣J 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
6 |
♠A
♥875
♦963
♣AKQT65
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 6♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 4♠ W -1 ♣A 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 8-Haley-Cole
100 3.70 1.30 4♣* N -1 ♥A 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Spencer-Stone
230 2.50 2.50 3♠ W +3 ♣A 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
650 0.70 4.30 4♠ W +1 ♣A 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Zinman-Karter
650 0.70 4.30 4♠ W +1 ♣A 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Wesolowski-Lasser
|
7 |
♠AK84
♥QJ74
♦54
♣A86
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.90 0.10 2♠ S +2 ♦A 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 9-Harken-Harken
140 1.90 3.10 3♠ S ♦A 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 1.90 3.10 3♠ S ♦A 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 3-Zinman-Karter
140 1.90 3.10 2♠ S +1 ♦A 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Spencer-Stone
140 1.90 3.10 2♠ N +1 ♦8 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 8-Haley-Cole
|
8 |
♠64
♥QJT73
♦JT8
♣Q32
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 3N W -1 ♥Q 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 8-Haley-Cole
170 3.70 1.30 2♠ E +2 ♦5 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥2 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 9-Harken-Harken
460 1.30 3.70 3N E +2 ♣4 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Spencer-Stone
490 0.10 4.90 3N W +3 ♥Q 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 3-Zinman-Karter
|
9 |
♠J654
♥Q8
♦AQ94
♣973
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 3♣ E -1 ♦3 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 9-Harken-Harken
140 3.10 1.90 3♥ W ♦A 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 3.10 1.90 2♥ W +1 ♦4 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 8-Haley-Cole
170 0.70 4.30 2♥ W +2 ♠4 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Spencer-Stone
170 0.70 4.30 2♥ E +2 ♥3 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 3-Zinman-Karter
|
10 |
♠KJT2
♥A7
♦95
♣A9754
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.90 0.10 3N N +3 ♦4 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
600 3.70 1.30 3N S ♥3 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 4-Spencer-Stone
210 2.50 2.50 2N S +3 ♦3 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 9-Harken-Harken
180 1.30 3.70 2N S +2 ♥3 3-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
120 0.10 4.90 2N S ♦6 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
11 |
♠QJ64
♥T2
♦QT2
♣K832
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3/2♥ ♦3 ♠3/2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.30 0.70 4♠ S ♥4 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 9-Harken-Harken
420 4.30 0.70 4♠ S ♥4 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 4-Spencer-Stone
170 1.90 3.10 3♠ S +1 ♥4 3-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
170 1.90 3.10 2♠ S +2 ♥6 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 0.10 4.90 4♠ S -1 ♥4 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
|
12 |
♠9542
♥53
♦K6
♣AKQT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4/3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.10 1.90 3♠ W ♣A 3-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
140 3.10 1.90 3♠ W ♣A 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
140 3.10 1.90 3♠ W ♣A 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 4-Spencer-Stone
140 3.10 1.90 2♠ W +1 ♣A 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
170 0.10 4.90 2♠ W +2 ♣A 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
13 |
♠A52
♥Q53
♦A6
♣T9853
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ -/1NT ♦4/3 ♠5 NT5/7 |
EW: 3/2♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.30 0.70 3♠ E -1 ♠6 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
100 4.30 0.70 4♦ W -1 ♦A 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 11-Modest-Shipman Jr
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ E ♠J 3-Zinman-Karter vs 8-Haley-Cole
130 1.30 3.70 4♦ W ♥3 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
150 0.10 4.90 3♦ W +2 ♣T 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
14 |
♠KQT95
♥Q72
♦A6
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.30 0.70 5♥ S ♦3 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
450 4.30 0.70 4♥ S +1 ♦3 3-Zinman-Karter vs 8-Haley-Cole
170 2.50 2.50 3♠ N +1 ♣J 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
150 0.70 4.30 4♦ E -3 ♠6 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
150 0.70 4.30 2♣ N +3 ♦4 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 11-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
15 |
♠T2
♥A842
♦KQ6
♣KT93
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 4♥ W -1 ♣3 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 11-Modest-Shipman Jr
110 3.10 1.90 2♥ W ♣3 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
110 3.10 1.90 2♥ W ♣3 3-Zinman-Karter vs 8-Haley-Cole
140 1.30 3.70 3♠ W ♠T 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
170 0.10 4.90 3♥ W +1 ♠T 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
|
16 |
♠J86
♥9864
♦J95
♣T53
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5/4♦ 1♥ 5/4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♣8 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
100 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♥2 8-Haley-Cole vs 11-Modest-Shipman Jr
200 3.00 2.00 3♠ E +2 ♥2 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Zinman-Karter
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦T 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦T 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
650 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +1 ♥2 4-Spencer-Stone vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
17 |
♠J43
♥43
♦JT
♣QT8762
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3N E -4 ♥K 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
120 3.50 1.50 1N S +1 ♠7 8-Haley-Cole vs 11-Modest-Shipman Jr
120 3.50 1.50 1N S +1 ♥T 4-Spencer-Stone vs 9-Harken-Harken
90 2.00 3.00 1N S ♥T 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Zinman-Karter
50 1.00 4.00 3♠ E -1 ♥K 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 0.00 5.00 3♣ S -1 ♦A 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
|
18 |
♠KT743
♥KT765
♦K2
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3/4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♥3 4-Spencer-Stone vs 9-Harken-Harken
200 3.50 1.50 2♠ N +3 ♦6 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
200 3.50 1.50 4♣ E -4 ♠Q 8-Haley-Cole vs 11-Modest-Shipman Jr
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♠8 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
150 1.00 4.00 4♣ W -3 ♠Q 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Zinman-Karter
100 0.00 5.00 1N S -1 ♣3 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
|
19 |
♠T832
♥Q76
♦Q9
♣AT62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 3♦ S ♥3 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 8-Haley-Cole
90 3.50 1.50 2♦ S ♠5 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
90 3.50 1.50 2♦ S ♣Q 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Harken-Harken
50 2.00 3.00 3♦ S -1 ♠5 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Zinman-Karter
100 1.00 4.00 3♦ S -2 ♠5 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
150 0.00 5.00 3N N -3 ♥A 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Spencer-Stone
|
20 |
♠J76
♥KQ5
♦743
♣A842
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3/4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4/3♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣2 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Zinman-Karter
120 4.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♣2 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 8-Haley-Cole
600 2.50 2.50 3N W ♠6 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Spencer-Stone
600 2.50 2.50 3N W ♣2 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
630 0.50 4.50 3N W +1 ♣2 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Harken-Harken
630 0.50 4.50 3N W +1 ♣2 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
21 |
♠K4
♥KT732
♦AQ975
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1/2♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣5 |
EW: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣3 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
620 4.00 1.00 4♠ S ♣A 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 2.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♠9 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Spencer-Stone
100 2.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♠9 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Zinman-Karter
100 2.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♥A 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 8-Haley-Cole
200 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -2 ♥A 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
22 |
♠94
♥K8
♦Q82
♣AKT874
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ -/1NT ♣5 ♠6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♣A 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
110 4.00 1.00 3♣ N ♦5 3-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Harken-Harken
90 3.00 2.00 2♣ N ♥J 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
50 1.50 3.50 2N N -1 ♦6 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 8-Haley-Cole
50 1.50 3.50 3♣ N -1 ♥J 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 2-Wesolowski-Lasser
100 0.00 5.00 3♣ N -2 ♥J 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Spencer-Stone
|
23 |
♠KT32
♥Q96
♦53
♣AQT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2/3♥ 1NT ♠5/4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.50 0.50 2N N +1 ♦4 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 2-Wesolowski-Lasser
150 4.50 0.50 2N N +1 ♦4 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 8-Haley-Cole
110 3.00 2.00 2♦ S +1 ♣6 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
90 2.00 3.00 1N N ♠7 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Spencer-Stone
400 0.50 4.50 3N N -4 ♠9 3-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Harken-Harken
400 0.50 4.50 3N N -4 ♠4 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
|
24 |
♠AKQ654
♥8
♦98764
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♠ ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 1.00 5♥ W -2 ♠A 6-Johnson-Reuben vs 2-Wesolowski-Lasser
100 4.00 1.00 5♥ W -2 ♠A 11-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
100 4.00 1.00 5♥ W -2 ♣3 10-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Spencer-Stone
50 1.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♦Q 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Rodgers-Feldstein
50 1.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♦Q 12-Avenmarg-Smith vs 8-Haley-Cole
100 0.00 5.00 5♠ N -2 ♦Q 3-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
25 |
♠-
♥AK852
♦Q762
♣9873
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 2NT ♣3/4 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.90 0.10 2♣ S +2 ♥J 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ S ♥J 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 3-Zinman-Karter
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ S ♥3 4-Spencer-Stone vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ S ♣Q 8-Haley-Cole vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
50 0.10 4.90 2♠ S -1 ♦A 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 11-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
26 |
♠A9
♥KT54
♦T542
♣864
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 2♦ W -1 ♠A 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 3-Zinman-Karter
90 3.70 1.30 2♦ W ♠A 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
100 1.90 3.10 2♥ N -1 ♠K 4-Spencer-Stone vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
100 1.90 3.10 3♣ S -1 ♦A 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 11-Modest-Shipman Jr
200 0.10 4.90 3N N -2 ♦J 8-Haley-Cole vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
|
27 |
♠QJ7
♥K542
♦Q42
♣T62
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 3N W -1 ♥2 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 3-Zinman-Karter
110 3.70 1.30 2♦ E +1 ♥J 2-Wesolowski-Lasser vs 11-Modest-Shipman Jr
130 1.90 3.10 2♦ E +2 ♥J 4-Spencer-Stone vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
130 1.90 3.10 2♦ E +2 ♥6 8-Haley-Cole vs 6-Johnson-Reuben
150 0.10 4.90 2N E +1 ♥6 5-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 10-Claussen-Burtch
|