1 |
♠Q652
♥T5
♦Q9
♣Q5432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ E +1 ♣J 1-Benson-Lasser vs 1-Payne-Perkins
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ E +2 ♣J 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♠4 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♠4 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♣9 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Walker-Winham
|
2 |
♠73
♥AJ2
♦KJ53
♣QT65
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 6♥ 5NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♠J 1-Benson-Lasser vs 1-Payne-Perkins
650 2.50 1.50 5♥ S ♠J 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠J 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ S ♣9 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ S +1 ♣9 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Walker-Winham
|
3 |
♠JT4
♥AJ3
♦8
♣K98653
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ S ♠A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Walker-Winham
110 3.50 0.50 1♥ S +1 ♠A 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 1-Benson-Lasser vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♣7 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 ♠A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
|
4 |
♠A752
♥753
♦AT5
♣A74
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥6 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥6 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥6 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♦8 1-Benson-Lasser vs 1-Payne-Perkins
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ N +2 ♥Q 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Walker-Winham
|
5 |
♠AT4
♥KJT6
♦8762
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ E +1 ♦9 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Perkins
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ E +1 ♦T 2-Bell-Ford vs 2-Cowen-Burk
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♠5 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Walker-Winham
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♦T 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♣5 1-Benson-Lasser vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
6 |
♠J5
♥KJ97
♦A642
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠Q 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Walker-Winham
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 ♠A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♥2 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♠8 1-Benson-Lasser vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♠8 2-Bell-Ford vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
7 |
♠QT4
♥T53
♦96
♣AKT75
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ W +1 ♣A 2-Bell-Ford vs 2-Cowen-Burk
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ E +2 ♠7 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Perkins
630 2.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♣A 1-Benson-Lasser vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
660 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♣7 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Walker-Winham
660 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♣5 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
|
8 |
♠KJ7
♥KJT
♦JT63
♣T87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5/4 ♥6/5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 ♥4 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♥4 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
50 2.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♠2 2-Bell-Ford vs 2-Cowen-Burk
150 1.00 3.00 2N E +1 ♠2 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Walker-Winham
180 0.00 4.00 1N W +3 ♦3 1-Benson-Lasser vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
9 |
♠53
♥K8754
♦J43
♣A75
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2/1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♥T 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
100 3.00 1.00 2N W -1 ♥4 2-Bell-Ford vs 1-Payne-Perkins
80 1.50 2.50 1♥ E ♠2 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
80 1.50 2.50 1♥ E ♣Q 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Cowen-Burk
120 0.00 4.00 2N E ♦2 1-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Walker-Winham
|
10 |
♠T94
♥3
♦J8642
♣JT87
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥4/5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♣J 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♣K 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 2.00 2.00 3♣ S -1 ♠3 2-Bell-Ford vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E ♦A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.00 4.00 1♠ E +2 ♣A 1-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Walker-Winham
|
11 |
♠QT
♥A63
♦J8432
♣Q84
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2N W -1 ♦2 2-Bell-Ford vs 1-Payne-Perkins
150 3.00 1.00 2N E +1 ♠2 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Cowen-Burk
400 2.00 2.00 3N E ♠2 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
460 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♣8 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
460 0.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♦8 1-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Walker-Winham
|
12 |
♠Q853
♥65
♦AJT3
♣KJ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 ♥5 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 3.00 1.00 3♦ S -1 ♥2 2-Bell-Ford vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ E ♦K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ E +1 ♦K 1-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Walker-Winham
200 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -2 ♠J 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠K543
♥T8
♦A9762
♣63
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♠ E +2 ♣Q 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Payne-Perkins
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ E +1 ♦Q 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Cowen-Burk
300 2.00 2.00 3♣ S -3 ♠9 2-Bell-Ford vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♣6 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
680 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +2 ♣A 1-Benson-Lasser vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
|
14 |
♠5
♥J865
♦K943
♣T863
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♦ E -2 ♣K 2-Bell-Ford vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.00 1.00 2♦ E -1 ♥K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Cowen-Burk
50 2.00 2.00 2♣ S -1 ♦J 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W ♣3 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♣3 1-Benson-Lasser vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
|
15 |
♠K6
♥T652
♦T93
♣AJ65
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -4 ♣A 2-Bell-Ford vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ S ♠A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 2.00 2.00 1♠ W -1 ♣5 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
80 1.00 3.00 1♠ W ♣5 1-Benson-Lasser vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ W ♣5 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
16 |
♠85
♥K73
♦QT632
♣A42
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥A 2-Bell-Ford vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Payne-Perkins
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥4 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♦3 1-Benson-Lasser vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♦3 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
17 |
♠J964
♥Q952
♦Q763
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 3/2♠ 3/-NT ♣6 NT9/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♣8 2-Bell-Ford vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♣8 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
50 1.50 2.50 3♣ S -1 ♠A 1-Benson-Lasser vs 2-Cowen-Burk
50 1.50 2.50 2♣ S -1 ♠A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Payne-Perkins
130 0.00 4.00 4♦ W ♣8 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Walker-Winham
|
18 |
♠9
♥KT98762
♦86
♣J54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♠5 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Walker-Winham
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ N ♦A 1-Benson-Lasser vs 2-Cowen-Burk
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ N ♦A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ N ♣7 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♣A 2-Bell-Ford vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
|
19 |
♠T7642
♥AQ
♦KT986
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3/4 ♦3 ♠3 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 ♦2 1-Benson-Lasser vs 2-Cowen-Burk
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ N ♥7 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Walker-Winham
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♥7 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ S +1 ♥3 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 ♣K 2-Bell-Ford vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
|
20 |
♠86
♥K984
♦52
♣AKQ72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 1/2♠ 4NT ♦5/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♠4 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Payne-Perkins
200 3.00 1.00 2♦ W -2 ♣A 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
180 2.00 2.00 2N S +2 ♦8 2-Bell-Ford vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
200 0.50 3.50 3N N -2 ♥7 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Walker-Winham
200 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -2 ♦6 1-Benson-Lasser vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
21 |
♠9
♥AT732
♦943
♣AQ92
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 ♥8 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠A 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥J 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Walker-Winham
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♣3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E ♣3 2-Bell-Ford vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
|
22 |
♠AKQJ
♥AJ743
♦QT75
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4/3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥1 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 5♥ N +1 ♠3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
450 1.50 2.50 5♥ N ♠6 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Walker-Winham
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♠7 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +1 ♠8 2-Bell-Ford vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +1 ♣2 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
23 |
♠Q973
♥A87
♦AT82
♣A6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 1/2NT ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♦J 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Walker-Winham
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♣Q 2-Bell-Ford vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♦7 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♦6 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 ♥2 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
|
24 |
♠T632
♥J985
♦Q4
♣K93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♦6 2-Bell-Ford vs 3-Vokos-Vokos
100 2.50 1.50 3♦ W -2 ♣3 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Walker-Winham
100 2.50 1.50 2♦ W -2 ♥9 4-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
90 1.00 3.00 1N S ♦6 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Suddards-Davidson
90 0.00 4.00 2♦ W ♣K 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|