1 |
♠T52
♥Q5
♦T964
♣J974
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1/-♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♥7/6 ♠3/2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 6.00 0.00 4♠ S ♦5 7-Winham-Harken vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
400 4.50 1.50 5♣ S ♥J 2-Bell-Ford vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
400 4.50 1.50 5♣ S ♥J 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
170 3.00 3.00 2♠ S +2 ♥J 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 7-Walker-Burk
130 1.50 4.50 4♣ S ♥J 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
130 1.50 4.50 3♣ S +1 ♥J 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
50 0.00 6.00 2N N -1 ♥7 1-Mount-Grinder vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
|
2 |
♠AKT8
♥AT6
♦T95
♣A73
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♥4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
120 5.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♦3 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 4.00 2.00 2♦ E -2 ♠7 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
90 2.50 3.50 1N S ♥K 2-Bell-Ford vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
90 2.50 3.50 1N N ♦5 7-Winham-Harken vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
100 1.00 5.00 1N N -1 ♥4 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 7-Walker-Burk
200 0.00 6.00 2♣ N -2 ♠4 1-Mount-Grinder vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
|
3 |
♠8
♥AQJT98
♦Q9
♣AKJ3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠2 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
420 4.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠2 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 7-Walker-Burk
420 4.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
420 4.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦5 7-Winham-Harken vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
420 4.00 2.00 4♥ N ♣T 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.50 5.50 2♥ N +2 ♣T 2-Bell-Ford vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
170 0.50 5.50 1♥ N +3 ♠2 1-Mount-Grinder vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
|
4 |
♠53
♥A74
♦A872
♣K985
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 1/2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♠3 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
140 4.50 1.50 3♠ W ♣5 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
140 4.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 ♦5 7-Winham-Harken vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
170 2.50 3.50 3♠ W +1 ♦A 2-Bell-Ford vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
170 2.50 3.50 2♠ W +2 ♣5 1-Mount-Grinder vs 7-Walker-Burk
230 1.00 5.00 3♠ W +3 ♣5 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
620 0.00 6.00 4♠ W ♥7 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
5 |
♠T7
♥A53
♦J76
♣QT432
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 1.00 2N E -4 ♠3 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
200 5.00 1.00 3♣ E -4 ♠A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
200 5.00 1.00 3♣ E -4 ♦5 7-Winham-Harken vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
150 3.00 3.00 2N N +1 ♣6 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
120 2.00 4.00 1N S +1 ♥9 2-Bell-Ford vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
50 1.00 5.00 2♥ W -1 ♠7 1-Mount-Grinder vs 7-Walker-Burk
200 0.00 6.00 3♣ S -2 ♥J 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
6 |
♠72
♥AJT83
♦7
♣KJT83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣1 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 6.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♠J 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
450 5.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♦A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
420 4.00 2.00 4♥ S ♠J 1-Mount-Grinder vs 7-Walker-Burk
170 3.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♣2 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
50 1.50 4.50 3N S -1 ♦3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
50 1.50 4.50 3N S -1 ♦3 7-Winham-Harken vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
100 0.00 6.00 3N S -2 ♦3 2-Bell-Ford vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
|
7 |
♠64
♥7
♦AK6543
♣T964
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3/2♣ 1♦ 2/1NT ♥5 ♠5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.50 0.50 3♠ N ♣7 7-Winham-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 5.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♣3 2-Bell-Ford vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
100 3.50 2.50 3♦ W -1 ♠J 1-Mount-Grinder vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
100 3.50 2.50 3♣ W -1 ♥7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 7-Walker-Burk
100 1.50 4.50 4♠ S -1 ♥4 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
100 1.50 4.50 3♥ S -1 ♠9 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
300 0.00 6.00 3♥ S -3 ♣8 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
|
8 |
♠AJT
♥QJ6
♦K9872
♣AT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4/3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♥3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 7-Walker-Burk
430 5.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♥3 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
400 3.00 3.00 3N N ♥3 2-Bell-Ford vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
400 3.00 3.00 3N N ♥3 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
400 3.00 3.00 3N N ♥3 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
50 0.50 5.50 3N S -1 ♥3 7-Winham-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.50 5.50 4♠ N -1 ♥7 1-Mount-Grinder vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
|
9 |
♠7632
♥9874
♦AQJ
♣JT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♣7 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
600 5.00 1.00 3N E ♠4 7-Winham-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
630 3.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♠4 1-Mount-Grinder vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
630 3.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♠4 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
630 3.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♠4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 7-Walker-Burk
660 0.50 5.50 3N W +2 ♥7 2-Bell-Ford vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
660 0.50 5.50 3N E +2 ♠4 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
|
10 |
♠93
♥Q532
♦QJT94
♣84
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 2♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 6.00 0.00 4♠ E +1 ♥6 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
680 3.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♥6 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
680 3.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♥4 1-Mount-Grinder vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
680 3.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♣Q 2-Bell-Ford vs 7-Walker-Burk
680 3.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♣Q 7-Winham-Harken vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
680 3.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♣5 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
1430 0.00 6.00 6♠ E ♣Q 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
|
11 |
♠63
♥AK84
♦542
♣J632
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 3♠ E +2 ♥7 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
420 3.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
420 3.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥2 7-Winham-Harken vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
420 3.50 2.50 4♠ E ♣A 2-Bell-Ford vs 7-Walker-Burk
420 3.50 2.50 4♠ E ♣9 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
450 0.50 5.50 4♠ E +1 ♦7 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
450 0.50 5.50 4♠ E +1 ♣A 1-Mount-Grinder vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
|
12 |
♠943
♥84
♦KQJ9
♣J953
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ -/1NT ♦5/6 ♥5/6 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♠4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
100 5.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♦K 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
50 3.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 ♠4 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
50 3.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 ♦K 2-Bell-Ford vs 7-Walker-Burk
50 3.00 3.00 2♥ E -1 ♣3 1-Mount-Grinder vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
100 1.00 5.00 3♠ S -1 ♥K 7-Winham-Harken vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
200 0.00 6.00 3♠ S -2 ♥K 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠T
♥A9742
♦J5
♣K9632
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ -/1NT ♣4/5 ♥4/6 NT5/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♣J 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
100 4.50 1.50 5♠ E -1 ♥Q 7-Winham-Harken vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
100 4.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥3 1-Mount-Grinder vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
620 1.50 4.50 4♠ E ♥Q 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 7-Walker-Burk
620 1.50 4.50 4♠ E ♥3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
620 1.50 4.50 4♠ E ♣J 2-Bell-Ford vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
620 1.50 4.50 4♠ E ♣J 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
14 |
♠AT632
♥62
♦K32
♣982
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥0 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 6♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 5.00 1.00 4♥ E +2 ♦4 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
480 5.00 1.00 4♥ E +2 ♣Q 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 7-Walker-Burk
480 5.00 1.00 4♥ E +2 ♣6 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
510 2.00 4.00 5♥ E +2 ♣Q 7-Winham-Harken vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
510 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +3 ♣Q 2-Bell-Ford vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
510 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +3 ♣7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
980 0.00 6.00 6♥ E ♣6 1-Mount-Grinder vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠T9
♥J854
♦AKJT3
♣32
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.50 0.50 3♦ N ♥7 1-Mount-Grinder vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
110 5.50 0.50 2♦ N +1 ♥7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
100 4.00 2.00 3♠* E -1 ♣A 7-Winham-Harken vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
100 3.00 3.00 5♦ N -1 ♠A 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 7-Walker-Burk
110 2.00 4.00 2♠ E ♥A 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
200 0.50 5.50 3♥ N -2 ♣Q 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
200 0.50 5.50 4♣ N -2 ♠A 2-Bell-Ford vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
|
16 |
♠J96
♥KJ6
♦QJ64
♣652
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4/5 ♠4 NT5/6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♦4 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 7-Walker-Burk
200 5.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♦4 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
140 4.00 2.00 3♠ S ♥A 7-Winham-Harken vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
100 3.00 3.00 3N W -1 ♣2 2-Bell-Ford vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
110 2.00 4.00 2♠ E ♦A 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
120 1.00 5.00 1N W +1 ♦4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
600 0.00 6.00 3N E ♦3 1-Mount-Grinder vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
17 |
♠A4
♥985
♦KJ854
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 2♠ S +3 ♣A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 7-Walker-Burk
140 4.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♥A 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
140 4.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♣A 2-Bell-Ford vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
50 3.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♣A 1-Mount-Grinder vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
130 2.00 4.00 4♣ E ♦Q 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
140 1.00 5.00 3♥ W ♠A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
430 0.00 6.00 3N W +1 ♦4 7-Winham-Harken vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
|
18 |
♠9754
♥JT8
♦92
♣QJ94
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 4♠ ♦2 ♥0 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 6/5♥ ♣5/2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.50 0.50 4♠ S -1 ♥A 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
100 5.50 0.50 4♠ S -1 ♥A 7-Winham-Harken vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
200 4.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 ♦A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 7-Walker-Burk
420 3.00 3.00 5♦ E +1 ♣A 2-Bell-Ford vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
480 1.50 4.50 5♥ W +1 ♠4 1-Mount-Grinder vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
480 1.50 4.50 4♥ W +2 ♠4 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
510 0.00 6.00 4♥ W +3 ♠4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
19 |
♠Q74
♥QT6
♦AKQ3
♣K94
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 5.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♥3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
460 5.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♥2 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
460 5.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♥2 7-Winham-Harken vs 7-Walker-Burk
430 2.50 3.50 3N N +1 ♠3 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
430 2.50 3.50 3N N +1 ♥2 2-Bell-Ford vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
400 1.00 5.00 3N N ♥2 1-Mount-Grinder vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
210 0.00 6.00 2N N +3 ♥2 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
|
20 |
♠AKT
♥9753
♦73
♣AJT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠3 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥6/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 4♣ N +1 ♠5 2-Bell-Ford vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
110 5.00 1.00 3♣ N ♥K 1-Mount-Grinder vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
140 2.00 4.00 3♠ W ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
140 2.00 4.00 3♠ W ♣6 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♥7 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♦7 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♦7 7-Winham-Harken vs 7-Walker-Burk
|
21 |
♠842
♥Q932
♦K863
♣K5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 3♠ W ♥2 6-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Dioszegi-Sydes
170 4.75 1.25 3♠ W +1 ♦3 1-Mount-Grinder vs 2-Wesolowski-Cowen
420 2.42 3.58 4♠ W ♦6 2-Bell-Ford vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
420 2.42 3.58 4♠ W ♦3 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Ficarrotta-Riley
420 2.42 3.58 4♠ W ♦3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
450 0.08 5.92 4♠ W +1 ♣K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Lasser-Steiger
|