1 |
♠3
♥9653
♦JT43
♣KQJ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 2♣ E -1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ W 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Haley-Cole
120 2.00 2.00 1N E +1 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
150 1.00 3.00 2N E +1 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
400 0.00 4.00 3N E 6-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
2 |
♠AT98
♥AT82
♦97
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3/2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3/2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ S +2 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Haley-Cole
120 1.00 3.00 1N S +1 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
90 0.00 4.00 2♣ E 6-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
3 |
♠J6
♥K732
♦K9654
♣65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥5/4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 4♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 5♦ S -2 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ E +2 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Haley-Cole
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 6-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
4 |
♠QJ3
♥82
♦QT84
♣8432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♣ W -1 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
120 3.00 1.00 1N E +1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Haley-Cole
200 1.00 3.00 1N S -2 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
200 1.00 3.00 1N S -2 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
200 1.00 3.00 1N* S -1 6-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
5 |
♠KQ74
♥JT5
♦T3
♣KT84
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 3.00 1.00 3N S 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
600 3.00 1.00 3N S 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
600 3.00 1.00 3N S 6-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Zinman-Karter
150 1.00 3.00 1N S +2 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Haley-Cole
|
6 |
♠A872
♥Q984
♦A643
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2/1 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Zinman-Karter
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 6-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -2 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 2-Albright-Gunter
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -2 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
|
7 |
♠QT
♥75
♦AJT32
♣T542
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥5 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1370 3.50 0.50 6♦ N 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
1370 3.50 0.50 6♦ N 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Zinman-Karter
620 1.00 3.00 5♦ S +1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
620 1.00 3.00 5♦ N +1 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 2-Albright-Gunter
620 1.00 3.00 5♦ N +1 6-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
8 |
♠KT93
♥A976
♦QJ
♣T83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 2-Albright-Gunter
150 3.00 1.00 2♦ W +3 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
400 1.50 2.50 5♦ W 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Zinman-Karter
400 1.50 2.50 5♦ W 6-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
|
9 |
♠AQ854
♥J85
♦J4
♣KJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1/-♥ 1♠ 2NT ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 4.00 0.00 2N S +2 6-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Zinman-Karter
100 2.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 2-Albright-Gunter
50 1.00 3.00 4♣ N -1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
150 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
|
10 |
♠K2
♥AQ953
♦J3
♣KT97
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1/-♦ 2♥ 1/-NT ♦7/6 ♠3 NT7/4 |
EW: 4♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ E +1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ E +2 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Zinman-Karter
200 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 2-Albright-Gunter
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 6-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
11 |
♠A76
♥QJ42
♦3
♣QT543
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ E -1 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 6-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Albright-Gunter
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 3-Haley-Cole
|
12 |
♠K65
♥A62
♦KT43
♣J83
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 3-Haley-Cole
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 6-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Albright-Gunter
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
13 |
♠A2
♥AK94
♦A7532
♣K5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 3.00 1.00 3N N +3 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
690 3.00 1.00 3N N +3 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
690 3.00 1.00 3N N +3 6-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Albright-Gunter
620 1.00 3.00 5♦ N +1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
170 0.00 4.00 3♦ S +3 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 3-Haley-Cole
|
14 |
♠J52
♥J7
♦5432
♣AK52
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 3-Haley-Cole
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 6-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Albright-Gunter
100 0.00 4.00 4♣ E -2 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
15 |
♠T987
♥J
♦AT864
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
50 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 3-Haley-Cole
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 6-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Albright-Gunter
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
|
16 |
♠KT5
♥K9
♦842
♣QJ642
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3/2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
120 3.00 1.00 2N N 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 2-Albright-Gunter
50 1.50 2.50 2N N -1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Haley-Cole
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
150 0.00 4.00 1N W +2 6-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
|
17 |
♠J6
♥J2
♦KQ92
♣AT652
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6/5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Haley-Cole
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 2-Albright-Gunter
50 1.50 2.50 2N W -1 6-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
100 0.00 4.00 2N S -2 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
18 |
♠QT8
♥A8
♦Q83
♣AKJ84
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 2-Albright-Gunter
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 6-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Haley-Cole
|
19 |
♠AQJT85
♥-
♦K98432
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 5♠ ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ ♣1 ♦3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 3♠ N +2 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 2-Albright-Gunter
200 3.50 0.50 3♠ N +2 6-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 1.00 3.00 4♣ N -1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Haley-Cole
350 0.00 4.00 3N S -7 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
|
20 |
♠AQ8
♥A83
♦T75
♣Q864
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠6/5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ S 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Haley-Cole
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ S 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 2-Albright-Gunter
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ S 6-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
|
21 |
♠AT98
♥96
♦KQ9
♣A642
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Haley-Cole
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ S 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Albright-Gunter
300 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
|
22 |
♠K64
♥Q
♦KJ543
♣QJ32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 2N E +1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Albright-Gunter
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Haley-Cole
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
|
23 |
♠KQ62
♥AKJ98
♦A5
♣52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 3/2♠ ♣4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♣ W -2 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Albright-Gunter
80 2.00 2.00 1♥ N 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Haley-Cole
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
24 |
♠T76
♥42
♦AKT93
♣K83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Albright-Gunter
50 3.50 0.50 3♣ E -1 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Haley-Cole
430 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
460 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
|
25 |
♠732
♥Q73
♦Q9742
♣J9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 1-Smith-Avenmarg
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 1.50 2.50 3♦ S -1 1-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Albright-Gunter
50 1.50 2.50 3♦ S -1 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Haley-Cole
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
26 |
♠J942
♥5
♦8653
♣AQJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2♥ 1NT ♣7/6 ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 6-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ S 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Haley-Cole
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ S +1 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Albright-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
27 |
♠QT
♥T96
♦AJ972
♣862
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S 6-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Haley-Cole
100 2.00 2.00 3♣ W -2 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Albright-Gunter
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
28 |
♠AK54
♥Q
♦AQ
♣AQ6542
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4/3♦ 3♥ 4/3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Haley-Cole
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 6-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
600 1.50 2.50 3N S 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 5-Zinman-Karter
600 1.50 2.50 3N N 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Albright-Gunter
500 0.00 4.00 6N N -5 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
29 |
♠AT96
♥753
♦A963
♣83
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ W 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Haley-Cole
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 3.00 1.00 1♥ E +2 6-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +2 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 5-Zinman-Karter
170 0.50 3.50 1♥ W +3 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Albright-Gunter
|
30 |
♠AT854
♥Q2
♦K2
♣AKT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1/-♦ ♣0 ♦7/6 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 6-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Marchegiani-Reiss
150 2.50 1.50 1N S +2 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Wasserstrom-Smith
150 2.50 1.50 3♣ S +2 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Albright-Gunter
130 1.00 3.00 3♣ S +1 2-Claussen-Burtch vs 3-Haley-Cole
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ E -2 3-Kuhlmann-Black vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|