1 |
♠K7
♥JT
♦AKJ865
♣972
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1090 4.00 0.00 6♦* N 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
420 2.00 2.00 5♦ N +1 3-Benich-Benich vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
420 2.00 2.00 5♦ N +1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
420 2.00 2.00 5♦ N +1 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 5-Jones-Henderson
100 0.00 4.00 5♥ W -2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
2 |
♠53
♥6
♦AK7
♣QJ87432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 6♠ E -2 3-Benich-Benich vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 5-Jones-Henderson
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 4-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
|
3 |
♠Q85
♥AJ2
♦AJT86
♣KJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 3-Benich-Benich vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
430 2.50 1.50 3N N +1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
430 2.50 1.50 3N N +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
400 1.00 3.00 3N N 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 5-Jones-Henderson
180 0.00 4.00 1N N +3 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
4 |
♠KQ74
♥AJ6
♦KJ5
♣542
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S 3-Benich-Benich vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
120 1.00 3.00 1N N +1 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 5-Jones-Henderson
80 0.00 4.00 1♠ N 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
5 |
♠A74
♥J2
♦7542
♣AQT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ W 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 3-Benich-Benich vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 5-Jones-Henderson
|
6 |
♠74
♥754
♦K765
♣Q543
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 3N* E -2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
100 2.50 1.50 1N E -1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
100 2.50 1.50 1N E -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
90 0.00 4.00 1N E 4-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Jones-Henderson
|
7 |
♠J
♥KQ2
♦JT862
♣Q963
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 4-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Jones-Henderson
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
|
8 |
♠8
♥T72
♦AKT42
♣Q865
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
500 0.00 4.00 5♦* S -3 4-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Jones-Henderson
|
9 |
♠Q74
♥932
♦KT8
♣AKQ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♦6/7 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.50 0.50 1N N 4-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Jones-Henderson
90 3.50 0.50 1N N 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 1.00 3.00 2N N -1 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
50 1.00 3.00 1N N -1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
50 1.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
|
10 |
♠K9
♥AQ432
♦AT64
♣96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ N 4-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Jones-Henderson
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ N 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ S 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ W -1 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
|
11 |
♠KJ5
♥KT73
♦754
♣A95
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 3-Benich-Benich vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
400 3.00 1.00 3N S 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
120 2.00 2.00 2N S 2-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ S 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 5-Jones-Henderson
50 0.00 4.00 1N N -1 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
|
12 |
♠KJ53
♥T8
♦AT4
♣KJ85
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.50 0.50 4♣ S 3-Benich-Benich vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
130 3.50 0.50 4♣ N 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ W +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ W +2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 5-Jones-Henderson
|
13 |
♠AK6
♥AQ4
♦JT76
♣Q53
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 4.00 0.00 5♦* E -3 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
200 3.00 1.00 1N E -2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 5-Jones-Henderson
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ N +1 3-Benich-Benich vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ N +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
670 0.00 4.00 3♦* E 2-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
14 |
♠J8764
♥AQ94
♦32
♣42
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1NT ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 2N S +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ W 3-Benich-Benich vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 5-Jones-Henderson
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ W 2-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -4 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
|
15 |
♠AQ8742
♥62
♦763
♣85
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ E +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
200 2.50 1.50 3♥ W +2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
200 2.50 1.50 3♥ W +2 3-Benich-Benich vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
300 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -3 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 5-Jones-Henderson
|
16 |
♠J2
♥QT92
♦KQ753
♣A8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 4.00 0.00 1♦ N +1 3-Benich-Benich vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ W +3 2-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
230 2.00 2.00 1♠ W +5 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
600 1.00 3.00 5♣ W 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
|
17 |
♠862
♥T3
♦KJ987
♣A43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4/6♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ 5/6♠ 5/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ W +2 3-Benich-Benich vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
480 1.50 2.50 5♠ W +1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +2 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
18 |
♠A6
♥AQJ
♦Q98
♣JT654
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 3.50 0.50 1N N +3 4-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
180 3.50 0.50 1N N +3 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
120 1.00 3.00 2N N 3-Benich-Benich vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
120 1.00 3.00 1N N +1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
120 1.00 3.00 1N N +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
|
19 |
♠Q92
♥632
♦Q3
♣QJ943
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 |
EW: 1/2♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ S 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ N 2-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
100 1.00 3.00 4♣ S -2 3-Benich-Benich vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +2 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
20 |
♠KJT86
♥-
♦Q742
♣A754
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5/6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 4-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 3-Benich-Benich vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ N 2-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ N 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ N +1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
21 |
♠Q765
♥QJ762
♦7
♣JT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦0 ♥3 ♠2 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 7♦ 4♥ 3/4♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
520 4.00 0.00 3N W +4 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
940 3.00 1.00 6♦ E +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Jones-Henderson
1020 1.00 3.00 6N W +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
1020 1.00 3.00 6N W +1 3-Benich-Benich vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
1020 1.00 3.00 6N W +1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
22 |
♠QT984
♥KQ32
♦T
♣KT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
430 2.50 1.50 3N S +1 3-Benich-Benich vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
430 2.50 1.50 3N N +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Jones-Henderson
180 1.00 3.00 2N N +2 4-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
|
23 |
♠AQ5
♥K75
♦QT5
♣8764
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT5/3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 3-Benich-Benich vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 2-Keay-Cooper vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Jones-Henderson
|
24 |
♠Q872
♥J87
♦A62
♣964
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 4-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ S -2 3-Benich-Benich vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ E 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Jones-Henderson
400 0.00 4.00 5♣ W 2-Keay-Cooper vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
|
25 |
♠T92
♥98
♦A982
♣T943
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦5/6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
200 3.50 0.50 3♣ W -2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
90 2.00 2.00 2♣ W 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ W +1 3-Benich-Benich vs 1-Wilkinson-Gunter
120 0.00 4.00 2N W 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Jones-Henderson
|
26 |
♠T6
♥J6
♦KQ9653
♣KQT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 4-Benz-Suddards vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ S 3-Benich-Benich vs 5-Jones-Henderson
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
|
27 |
♠J7653
♥K6
♦AQ84
♣T7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
120 2.00 2.00 1N E +1 3-Benich-Benich vs 5-Jones-Henderson
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
|
28 |
♠A3
♥AQ852
♦KJ2
♣Q96
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
630 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 3-Benich-Benich vs 5-Jones-Henderson
600 1.50 2.50 3N S 4-Benz-Suddards vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
600 1.50 2.50 3N N 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ S +1 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
|
29 |
♠94
♥QJT75
♦T72
♣765
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦0 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 2/1♣ 7♦ 4♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
710 2.00 2.00 5♠ W +2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
710 2.00 2.00 5♠ E +2 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
710 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +3 2-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
710 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +3 3-Benich-Benich vs 5-Jones-Henderson
710 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +3 4-Benz-Suddards vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
|
30 |
♠Q632
♥AK42
♦J3
♣J65
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦0/1 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Turnquist-Dykstra
400 3.00 1.00 3N E 6-Edmondson-Devlin vs 6-Schlinkert-Schlinkert
430 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 4-Benz-Suddards vs 2-Matthews-Nelson
430 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
460 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 3-Benich-Benich vs 5-Jones-Henderson
|