1 |
♠Q
♥K9864
♦J8
♣KQ652
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 2N E -1 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ S -2 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 5-Winham-Llacera
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ E 8-Hanson-Moller vs 1-Chase-Smith
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ W 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
2 |
♠QT6543
♥9875
♦7
♣K7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2/1♠ ♣6/5 ♦5 NT5/6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2/1♦ 1/-NT ♣7/6 ♥6 ♠5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 3N* E -2 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 5-Winham-Llacera
100 1.50 1.50 2N S -1 8-Hanson-Moller vs 1-Chase-Smith
100 1.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
200 0.00 3.00 2N S -2 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
3 |
♠-
♥AJ32
♦JT982
♣AQ75
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠2 |
EW: 4♠ ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
920 2.50 0.50 6♦ S 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
920 2.50 0.50 6♦ S 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 5-Winham-Llacera
100 1.00 2.00 3N S -2 8-Hanson-Moller vs 1-Chase-Smith
850 0.00 3.00 5♠* E 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
4 |
♠A
♥Q964
♦T986
♣AQ74
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 8-Hanson-Moller vs 1-Chase-Smith
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 5-Winham-Llacera
|
5 |
♠QJT7
♥T542
♦K986
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ S -1 1-Chase-Smith vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
200 1.00 2.00 3N S -2 5-Winham-Llacera vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
200 1.00 2.00 3N S -2 8-Hanson-Moller vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
200 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
|
6 |
♠T95
♥KJ87
♦92
♣AT95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3/4♦ 2♥ 3♠ -/1NT ♣5 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 1-Chase-Smith vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ E 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 5-Winham-Llacera vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ E 8-Hanson-Moller vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
7 |
♠642
♥K642
♦K7
♣Q742
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ W 1-Chase-Smith vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ W 5-Winham-Llacera vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ W 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ W 8-Hanson-Moller vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
8 |
♠9642
♥T
♦KJ62
♣JT73
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 2N W -3 5-Winham-Llacera vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 8-Hanson-Moller vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 1.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
50 0.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 1-Chase-Smith vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
|
9 |
♠QT9
♥AQT9543
♦43
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 4♦ E +1 1-Chase-Smith vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
600 1.00 2.00 5♦ E 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 5-Winham-Llacera
600 1.00 2.00 5♦ E 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
600 1.00 2.00 5♦ E 8-Hanson-Moller vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
10 |
♠3
♥9743
♦AQ9853
♣K9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ W 1-Chase-Smith vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
650 2.00 1.00 5♠ W 8-Hanson-Moller vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
680 0.50 2.50 4♠ W +2 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 5-Winham-Llacera
680 0.50 2.50 4♠ W +2 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
|
11 |
♠KQ94
♥K
♦AKJ
♣KQJ95
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 1.50 1.50 3N N +2 1-Chase-Smith vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
460 1.50 1.50 3N N +2 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 5-Winham-Llacera
460 1.50 1.50 3N N +2 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
460 1.50 1.50 3N N +2 8-Hanson-Moller vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
12 |
♠K9832
♥A
♦KJ5
♣9843
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/3♦ 2/3♥ 7♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1430 3.00 0.00 6♠ N 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
680 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 5-Winham-Llacera
210 1.00 2.00 2N S +3 1-Chase-Smith vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
150 0.00 3.00 2N S +1 8-Hanson-Moller vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
13 |
♠762
♥Q52
♦K86
♣QJ97
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 2♦ W +3 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Chase-Smith
600 2.00 1.00 5♦ E 8-Hanson-Moller vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
650 1.00 2.00 5♠ W 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 5-Winham-Llacera
680 0.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
|
14 |
♠KT75
♥64
♦JT9864
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 0.50 5♣ E -1 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Chase-Smith
50 2.50 0.50 5♣ E -1 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 5-Winham-Llacera
130 1.00 2.00 3♣ E +1 8-Hanson-Moller vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
450 0.00 3.00 5♥ W 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
|
15 |
♠J96543
♥83
♦764
♣A5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦0 ♥0 ♠3 NT0 |
EW: 2♣ 7♦ 7♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1010 2.00 1.00 6♥ W +1 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Chase-Smith
1010 2.00 1.00 6♥ W +1 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
1010 2.00 1.00 6♥ W +1 8-Hanson-Moller vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
1100 0.00 3.00 3♣* S -4 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 5-Winham-Llacera
|
16 |
♠Q753
♥A53
♦A82
♣QT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Chase-Smith
50 2.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 8-Hanson-Moller vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
120 0.50 2.50 1N W +1 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
120 0.50 2.50 1N W +1 7-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 5-Winham-Llacera
|
17 |
♠Q6
♥987
♦972
♣Q9875
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1/-♣ 5♥ 5♠ 4/3NT ♣7/6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 6♥ W -2 8-Hanson-Moller vs 5-Winham-Llacera
200 2.00 1.00 2♥ W +3 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 1-Chase-Smith vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
480 0.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
|
18 |
♠9864
♥JT86
♦K4
♣K92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 1N S +2 8-Hanson-Moller vs 5-Winham-Llacera
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 1-Chase-Smith vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
120 1.00 2.00 1N S +1 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
PASS 0.00 3.00 Pass Out 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
|
19 |
♠5
♥AK8542
♦K2
♣KQJ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 1-Chase-Smith vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
400 1.00 2.00 3N S 8-Hanson-Moller vs 5-Winham-Llacera
100 0.00 3.00 5♦ S -2 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
|
20 |
♠86
♥QJ95
♦AK5
♣AK93
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
90 1.00 2.00 1N N 1-Chase-Smith vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
90 1.00 2.00 1N N 8-Hanson-Moller vs 5-Winham-Llacera
90 1.00 2.00 1♣ N +1 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
|
21 |
♠A62
♥AK3
♦J7432
♣Q7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.00 0.00 3N N +1 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
600 2.00 1.00 3N N 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
100 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 8-Hanson-Moller vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 5-Winham-Llacera vs 1-Chase-Smith
|
22 |
♠62
♥T854
♦A753
♣T54
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 3N W -4 5-Winham-Llacera vs 1-Chase-Smith
200 2.00 1.00 3N W -2 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 1.00 2.00 2N W -1 8-Hanson-Moller vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
150 0.00 3.00 1N E +2 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
|
23 |
♠953
♥K5
♦J865
♣AQJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 3♠ 5NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 2.50 0.50 3N N +2 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
660 2.50 0.50 3N N +2 5-Winham-Llacera vs 1-Chase-Smith
600 0.50 2.50 5♦ S 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
600 0.50 2.50 5♦ S 8-Hanson-Moller vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
|
24 |
♠AKJ
♥Q4
♦KQ543
♣986
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣1 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ S -1 8-Hanson-Moller vs 6-Belden-Calhoun
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ N -1 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
200 1.00 2.00 3♥ E +2 4-Avenmarg-Smith vs 3-Rodgers-Feldstein
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 5-Winham-Llacera vs 1-Chase-Smith
|
25 |
♠AK83
♥A84
♦A9
♣J854
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 3♠ 4/2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 2.50 0.50 3N N +1 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Chase-Smith
430 2.50 0.50 3N N +1 8-Hanson-Moller vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 5-Winham-Llacera vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
26 |
♠Q4
♥87
♦QT9
♣QT9732
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ -/1NT ♥5 ♠5 NT6/7 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 2♣ W -3 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Chase-Smith
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 5-Winham-Llacera vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ W 8-Hanson-Moller vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
|
27 |
♠AKQJ87
♥K
♦KT
♣A842
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.50 0.50 3♠ N 5-Winham-Llacera vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
140 2.50 0.50 3♠ N 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 1.00 2.00 3N N -1 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Chase-Smith
150 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -3 8-Hanson-Moller vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
|
28 |
♠963
♥T543
♦AK63
♣K9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4/3 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.50 0.50 2♣ E +2 3-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 1-Chase-Smith
130 2.50 0.50 2♣ E +2 8-Hanson-Moller vs 7-Johnston-Ottenberg
400 0.50 2.50 3N E 5-Winham-Llacera vs 4-Avenmarg-Smith
400 0.50 2.50 5♣ E 6-Belden-Calhoun vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|