1 |
♠A
♥AQ52
♦J73
♣AT874
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣0 ♦5 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
440 4.00 0.00 5♣ N +2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Tainty-Smith
190 3.00 1.00 3♣ S +4 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
150 2.00 2.00 4♥ E -3 6-Hanson-Keen vs 5-Hasey-Benz
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ E -2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ E -2 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 4-Benich-Benich
|
2 |
♠8
♥AJ942
♦A543
♣983
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ -/1♦ ♦6/7 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 4-Benich-Benich
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Tainty-Smith
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
200 1.00 3.00 2♥* N -1 6-Hanson-Keen vs 5-Hasey-Benz
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
3 |
♠QJ85
♥T9
♦AKT6
♣A85
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 3.50 0.50 2N N +2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
180 3.50 0.50 1N S +3 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Tainty-Smith
150 2.00 2.00 1N N +2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ S +1 6-Hanson-Keen vs 5-Hasey-Benz
100 0.00 4.00 1N W -1 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 4-Benich-Benich
|
4 |
♠9643
♥AQ76
♦A
♣T653
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 4-Benich-Benich
100 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 6-Hanson-Keen vs 5-Hasey-Benz
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ W +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Tainty-Smith
130 0.00 4.00 2♦ W +2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
5 |
♠A942
♥Q
♦87
♣AQT865
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♠ ♦3/4 ♥6 NT5/6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S +1 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Tainty-Smith
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 4-Benich-Benich
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 6-Hanson-Keen vs 5-Hasey-Benz
|
6 |
♠AQ842
♥KQ4
♦J5
♣984
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠2/1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Hasey-Benz
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 6-Hanson-Keen vs 4-Benich-Benich
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 2-Keay-Cooper
|
7 |
♠KQ75
♥KJ8
♦KT2
♣Q92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3/4 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Hasey-Benz
100 3.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 2-Keay-Cooper
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
130 1.00 3.00 3♣ W +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
300 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -3 6-Hanson-Keen vs 4-Benich-Benich
|
8 |
♠A6
♥KQJ54
♦T4
♣KQT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/7♣ 5♦ 7♥ 6NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣0 ♦2 ♥0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 4.00 0.00 6♥ N 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
510 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +3 6-Hanson-Keen vs 4-Benich-Benich
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +2 2-Nelson-Grant vs 2-Keay-Cooper
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Hasey-Benz
|
9 |
♠AK9862
♥9
♦8642
♣96
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 5♥ W -1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 2-Nelson-Grant vs 2-Keay-Cooper
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 6-Hanson-Keen vs 4-Benich-Benich
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Hasey-Benz
|
10 |
♠KQT96
♥KT
♦AKJ
♣A73
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4/5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 2-Keay-Cooper
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 6-Hanson-Keen vs 4-Benich-Benich
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ N +3 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Hasey-Benz
170 0.00 4.00 1♠ N +3 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
|
11 |
♠Q5
♥AKQ85
♦543
♣A54
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 5-Hasey-Benz
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
120 2.00 2.00 2N N 6-Hanson-Keen vs 2-Keay-Cooper
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ N 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 3-Tainty-Smith
50 0.00 4.00 2♣ E -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
|
12 |
♠J83
♥J7643
♦T76
♣K9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 4/5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 6♦ W -1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
430 2.50 1.50 3N W +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
430 2.50 1.50 3N E +1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 5-Hasey-Benz
490 1.00 3.00 3N E +3 6-Hanson-Keen vs 2-Keay-Cooper
990 0.00 4.00 6N W 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 3-Tainty-Smith
|
13 |
♠A42
♥AQT85
♦5
♣QT92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 6-Hanson-Keen vs 2-Keay-Cooper
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ E 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 5-Hasey-Benz
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ E 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 3-Tainty-Smith
800 0.00 4.00 4♥* N -3 2-Nelson-Grant vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
14 |
♠J2
♥642
♦J872
♣QJ32
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4/3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ W 6-Hanson-Keen vs 2-Keay-Cooper
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ E +1 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 3-Tainty-Smith
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ E +2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 5-Hasey-Benz
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ E +2 2-Nelson-Grant vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ E +2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
|
15 |
♠32
♥T73
♦KJT97
♣654
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 1♠ S +1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ E 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 3-Tainty-Smith
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ E +1 6-Hanson-Keen vs 2-Keay-Cooper
130 1.50 2.50 2♣ E +2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
400 0.00 4.00 3N E 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 5-Hasey-Benz
|
16 |
♠A3
♥AJ763
♦AQ9
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 2NT ♣4/3 ♠5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦2 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 5♣* E -2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Benich-Benich
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 2-Nelson-Grant vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 6-Hanson-Keen vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
400 1.00 3.00 3N N 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 2-Keay-Cooper
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ N 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 3-Tainty-Smith
|
17 |
♠J3
♥AQJ97
♦Q8
♣7432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 3-Tainty-Smith
50 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -1 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Benich-Benich
50 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -1 6-Hanson-Keen vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
110 0.50 3.50 3♦ E 2-Nelson-Grant vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
110 0.50 3.50 2♦ E +1 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 2-Keay-Cooper
|
18 |
♠AT2
♥AQT754
♦Q2
♣52
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 6♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 6-Hanson-Keen vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Benich-Benich
200 2.00 2.00 1♥ N +4 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 2-Keay-Cooper
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 3-Tainty-Smith
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
|
19 |
♠K87
♥AK62
♦AT8
♣K86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 4.00 0.00 2♣* E -3 2-Nelson-Grant vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
180 3.00 1.00 2♣* S 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 3-Tainty-Smith
100 2.00 2.00 2♦ W -1 6-Hanson-Keen vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
90 1.00 3.00 1N N 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Benich-Benich
50 0.00 4.00 1N N -1 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 2-Keay-Cooper
|
20 |
♠A3
♥AK9
♦K85
♣AQ842
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 3-Tainty-Smith
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 2-Keay-Cooper
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Benich-Benich
630 0.00 4.00 3N N +1 6-Hanson-Keen vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
21 |
♠QJ
♥AJ93
♦T5
♣KJ753
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 3/2♦ 4♠ ♣2 ♥5/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Tainty-Smith
100 2.50 1.50 5♣ N -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Hasey-Benz
100 2.50 1.50 3♣ S -1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 4-Benich-Benich
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
500 0.00 4.00 5♣* S -2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 2-Keay-Cooper
|
22 |
♠A953
♥K7
♦532
♣J974
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ S -1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 4-Benich-Benich
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ S -1 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Tainty-Smith
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -2 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 2-Keay-Cooper
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -2 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Hasey-Benz
|
23 |
♠AQ4
♥KQJ954
♦T
♣Q87
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣0 ♦1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 6NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.88 0.13 3N E -3 2-Nelson-Grant vs 4-Benich-Benich
100 2.00 2.00 5♦ W -1 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Tainty-Smith
100 2.00 2.00 5♣ E -1 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 2-Keay-Cooper
150 0.13 3.88 4♣ W +1 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
24 |
♠986
♥98532
♦A3
♣T72
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦3 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5/6♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5/6♠ 5/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.25 0.75 4♠ E 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 2-Keay-Cooper
420 3.25 0.75 4♠ E 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
460 1.38 2.63 3N W +2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Tainty-Smith
480 0.13 3.88 4♠ E +2 2-Nelson-Grant vs 4-Benich-Benich
|
25 |
♠JT964
♥J8
♦Q54
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 4/3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.88 0.13 2N W -2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Tainty-Smith
100 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 4-Benich-Benich
100 2.00 2.00 3N E -1 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
120 0.13 3.88 2N W 1-Oldden-Nicolaisen vs 2-Keay-Cooper
|
26 |
♠T732
♥73
♦JT73
♣A63
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♠ 5/3NT ♦5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 6-Hanson-Keen vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
600 3.00 1.00 5♣ E 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 5-Hasey-Benz
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Keay-Cooper
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 3-Tainty-Smith
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Benich-Benich
|
27 |
♠J
♥QJ742
♦QJ43
♣953
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 4♦ 4/5♥ 3/4♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Benich-Benich
400 2.50 1.50 3N S 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Keay-Cooper
400 2.50 1.50 3N S 6-Hanson-Keen vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
180 1.00 3.00 2N N +2 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 5-Hasey-Benz
50 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 3-Tainty-Smith
|
28 |
♠AQ95
♥J76
♦KQ753
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.00 0.00 5♦ N 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Keay-Cooper
300 3.00 1.00 5♣* E -2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Benich-Benich
100 2.00 2.00 5♦ N -1 2-Nelson-Grant vs 3-Tainty-Smith
200 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 6-Hanson-Keen vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
400 0.00 4.00 5♦ N -4 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 5-Hasey-Benz
|
29 |
♠KQ96
♥AKJ
♦9
♣AT943
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♥ 6♠ 1/4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥2 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Keay-Cooper
680 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 6-Hanson-Keen vs 6-Chatfield-Chatfield
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Benich-Benich
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ S 2-Nelson-Grant vs 3-Tainty-Smith
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ S +2 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 5-Hasey-Benz
|
30 |
♠AKQJT963
♥6
♦K9
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6/5♠ 6/2NT ♦6/4 ♥4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
510 2.00 2.00 5♠ N +2 3-Edmondson-Devlin vs 5-Hasey-Benz
510 2.00 2.00 5♠ N +2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Keay-Cooper
510 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +3 2-Nelson-Grant vs 3-Tainty-Smith
510 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +3 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Benich-Benich
|