1 |
♠K864
♥J7
♦K9873
♣K3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
450 4.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 1-Belden-Perkins
420 2.00 3.00 4♠ S 3-Seldeen-Llacera vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
420 2.00 3.00 4♠ S 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
420 2.00 3.00 4♠ S 8-Winham-Spencer vs 4-Smyth-Ray
100 0.00 5.00 6♠ S -2 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 10-Diola-Stone
|
2 |
♠JT7
♥T542
♦AJ4
♣JT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 3-Seldeen-Llacera vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
50 3.00 2.00 1N E -1 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 10-Diola-Stone
50 3.00 2.00 1N E -1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 1-Belden-Perkins
50 3.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
200 1.00 4.00 3♥ N -2 8-Winham-Spencer vs 4-Smyth-Ray
300 0.00 5.00 3♥ N -3 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
|
3 |
♠643
♥K62
♦AK85
♣A93
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 1♥ S +2 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
120 4.00 1.00 1N N +1 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
90 3.00 2.00 1N S 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 10-Diola-Stone
50 2.00 3.00 3N N -1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 1-Belden-Perkins
70 1.00 4.00 1♣ W 8-Winham-Spencer vs 4-Smyth-Ray
90 0.00 5.00 1N W 3-Seldeen-Llacera vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
|
4 |
♠KQJ653
♥2
♦A96
♣T72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3♥* E -1 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 10-Diola-Stone
100 3.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
100 3.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
100 1.50 3.50 2N S -1 1-Belden-Perkins vs 8-Winham-Spencer
100 1.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
140 0.00 5.00 3♥ E 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 4-Smyth-Ray
|
5 |
♠JT8
♥KJ752
♦K865
♣7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
790 5.00 0.00 4♠* S 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 10-Diola-Stone
650 4.00 1.00 5♠ S 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
300 3.00 2.00 5♦* W -2 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
100 2.00 3.00 5♦* W -1 1-Belden-Perkins vs 8-Winham-Spencer
100 0.50 4.50 5♠ N -1 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 4-Smyth-Ray
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ S -1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
|
6 |
♠973
♥KQ653
♦AQ9
♣AK
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 5.00 0.00 4♥ N 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
170 3.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 10-Diola-Stone
170 3.50 1.50 1♥ N +3 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
140 2.00 3.00 3♥ N 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 4-Smyth-Ray
50 0.50 4.50 4♥ N -1 1-Belden-Perkins vs 8-Winham-Spencer
50 0.50 4.50 4♥ N -1 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
|
7 |
♠T2
♥K54
♦QJ96
♣AT74
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 5.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
620 4.00 1.00 4♠ S 10-Diola-Stone vs 8-Winham-Spencer
200 3.00 2.00 3♥ S +2 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 4-Smyth-Ray
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ S +1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
140 1.00 4.00 3♥ S 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
200 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -2 1-Belden-Perkins vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
|
8 |
♠AQT
♥AQ7
♦A
♣KJT765
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 7♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠0 NT3/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 5.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 4-Smyth-Ray
170 3.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
170 3.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
170 3.00 2.00 2♥ N +2 1-Belden-Perkins vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
70 1.00 4.00 1♣ N 10-Diola-Stone vs 8-Winham-Spencer
100 0.00 5.00 3♣ N -2 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
|
9 |
♠AKT9
♥KT6
♦KJ42
♣K5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 1-Belden-Perkins vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 10-Diola-Stone vs 8-Winham-Spencer
50 2.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
50 2.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
100 0.50 4.50 3N N -2 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 4-Smyth-Ray
100 0.50 4.50 3♥ N -2 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
|
10 |
♠J9
♥T3
♦AQ83
♣Q8632
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 4♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 3♥ W 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
170 4.00 1.00 3♠ E +1 10-Diola-Stone vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ W 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ W 8-Winham-Spencer vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ E 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 4-Smyth-Ray
790 0.00 5.00 4♠* W 3-Seldeen-Llacera vs 1-Belden-Perkins
|
11 |
♠J876
♥9853
♦-
♣J9865
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1/2 |
EW: 2♣ 6♦ 5/6♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 6♦ E -2 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
50 4.00 1.00 6N W -1 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
400 2.50 2.50 3N W 8-Winham-Spencer vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
400 2.50 2.50 3N W 10-Diola-Stone vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
460 0.50 4.50 3N W +2 3-Seldeen-Llacera vs 1-Belden-Perkins
460 0.50 4.50 3N W +2 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 4-Smyth-Ray
|
12 |
♠J875
♥A7
♦K876
♣953
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.50 0.50 2♠ E -3 3-Seldeen-Llacera vs 1-Belden-Perkins
150 4.50 0.50 3♥ W -3 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
120 3.00 2.00 1N S +1 10-Diola-Stone vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
100 2.00 3.00 1N E -2 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 4-Smyth-Ray
90 1.00 4.00 1N S 8-Winham-Spencer vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
100 0.00 5.00 1N N -1 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
|
13 |
♠JT5
♥QT95
♦T9
♣AK54
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2/1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 1N E -1 1-Belden-Perkins vs 10-Diola-Stone
90 4.00 1.00 8-Winham-Spencer vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
90 2.00 3.00 1N W 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
90 2.00 3.00 1N E 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
90 2.00 3.00 1N E 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
100 0.00 5.00 2♣ S -1 4-Smyth-Ray vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
|
14 |
♠754
♥QJ752
♦2
♣KQT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 5♦ E -2 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
50 2.50 2.50 3N W -1 1-Belden-Perkins vs 10-Diola-Stone
50 2.50 2.50 3N W -1 4-Smyth-Ray vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
50 2.50 2.50 3N W -1 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
50 2.50 2.50 3N W -1 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
110 0.00 5.00 3♦ E 3-Seldeen-Llacera vs 8-Winham-Spencer
|
15 |
♠-
♥K32
♦AT862
♣J9843
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.50 0.50 6♠ W -1 3-Seldeen-Llacera vs 8-Winham-Spencer
50 4.50 0.50 5♠ E -1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 4-Smyth-Ray vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 1-Belden-Perkins vs 10-Diola-Stone
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
|
16 |
♠J97
♥AT82
♦Q652
♣K5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.00 0.00 1♥ N +3 4-Smyth-Ray vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 1-Belden-Perkins vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 10-Diola-Stone
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 8-Winham-Spencer vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
|
17 |
♠J87643
♥AK63
♦-
♣K63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♦ 2♥ 2/1♠ ♦7/6 NT5 |
EW: 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 2♠ N 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
50 4.00 1.00 2N E -1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
90 3.00 2.00 1N E 8-Winham-Spencer vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
100 2.00 3.00 3♥* N -1 4-Smyth-Ray vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
120 1.00 4.00 1N E +1 1-Belden-Perkins vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
150 0.00 5.00 1N E +2 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 10-Diola-Stone
|
18 |
♠J97
♥AJ643
♦87
♣Q76
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1440 4.00 1.00 6N S 1-Belden-Perkins vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
1440 4.00 1.00 6N S 4-Smyth-Ray vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
1440 4.00 1.00 6N S 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
690 1.50 3.50 3N S +3 8-Winham-Spencer vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
690 1.50 3.50 3N S +3 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
100 0.00 5.00 6♠ N -1 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 10-Diola-Stone
|
19 |
♠72
♥T2
♦964
♣Q98763
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2NT ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ ♣5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
280 5.00 0.00 1N* S +1 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 4-Smyth-Ray
50 4.00 1.00 3♣ S -1 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 1-Belden-Perkins
150 3.00 2.00 3♦ S -3 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
170 1.50 3.50 3♥ W +1 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 8-Winham-Spencer
170 1.50 3.50 2♥ E +2 10-Diola-Stone vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
650 0.00 5.00 4♥ W +1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
|
20 |
♠QT643
♥A3
♦652
♣A43
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 8-Winham-Spencer
100 3.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 1-Belden-Perkins
100 3.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
100 2.00 3.00 4♣ S -1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
200 1.00 4.00 3♣* S -1 10-Diola-Stone vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
500 0.00 5.00 4♣* S -2 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 4-Smyth-Ray
|
21 |
♠A
♥Q74
♦AJ3
♣QJT974
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 5.00 0.00 4♠* W -4 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 4-Smyth-Ray
600 4.00 1.00 3N S 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 8-Winham-Spencer
130 2.50 2.50 4♣ N 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
130 2.50 2.50 3♣ N +1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 7-Gamble-Jennings
100 1.00 4.00 3♠ W -2 10-Diola-Stone vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
100 0.00 5.00 4♦ S -1 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 1-Belden-Perkins
|
22 |
♠K73
♥K97
♦QJT3
♣A84
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠4/3 NT6/3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
100 4.50 0.50 3♠ E -1 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
50 3.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 3-Seldeen-Llacera vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
140 1.00 4.00 3♠ E 10-Diola-Stone vs 4-Smyth-Ray
140 1.00 4.00 3♠ E 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 1-Belden-Perkins
140 1.00 4.00 1♠ E +2 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 8-Winham-Spencer
|
23 |
♠Q
♥5
♦J9763
♣AQT754
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1/2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 5.00 0.00 3N S 3-Seldeen-Llacera vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
500 4.00 1.00 3♦* E -2 10-Diola-Stone vs 4-Smyth-Ray
150 3.00 2.00 3♣ N +2 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ S 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
100 1.00 4.00 3N N -1 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 1-Belden-Perkins
200 0.00 5.00 3N S -2 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 8-Winham-Spencer
|
24 |
♠A96
♥K632
♦KQ742
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 11-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 1-Belden-Perkins
50 3.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 3-Seldeen-Llacera vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
50 3.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 10-Diola-Stone vs 4-Smyth-Ray
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 6-Balassi-Basilico vs 2-Simon-McIntosh
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 5-Edmondson-Miller
100 1.00 4.00 2♦ N -2 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 8-Winham-Spencer
|
25 |
♠AT752
♥875
♦QT7
♣T7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 3♠ S 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
50 2.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
50 2.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 4-Smyth-Ray vs 1-Belden-Perkins
50 2.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 10-Diola-Stone
50 2.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
100 0.00 5.00 4♠* S -1 8-Winham-Spencer vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
|
26 |
♠T82
♥-
♦T4
♣AKQJ8543
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦1 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 3/4♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠5/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 4♦ E +1 4-Smyth-Ray vs 1-Belden-Perkins
200 4.00 1.00 5♣* N -1 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
600 3.00 2.00 5♦ E 8-Winham-Spencer vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
620 2.00 3.00 5♦ E +1 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
800 1.00 4.00 6♣* N -3 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 10-Diola-Stone
1100 0.00 5.00 5♠* N -4 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
|
27 |
♠A2
♥Q93
♦A874
♣AT96
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 5.00 0.00 3♦ N +1 7-Gamble-Jennings vs 3-Seldeen-Llacera
110 3.50 1.50 3♦ N 2-Simon-McIntosh vs 11-Wasserstrom-Pender
110 3.50 1.50 3♦ N 4-Smyth-Ray vs 1-Belden-Perkins
50 1.00 4.00 1N N -1 8-Winham-Spencer vs 6-Balassi-Basilico
50 1.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 12-Schamberg-Flowers vs 9-Friedberg-Ottenberg
50 1.00 4.00 1♦ N -1 5-Edmondson-Miller vs 10-Diola-Stone
|