1 |
♠763
♥KT83
♦QT983
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.90 0.10 3♣ E +1 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
400 3.70 1.30 3N E 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
430 1.30 3.70 3N W +1 3-Ford-Powell vs 5-Murdock-Winham
430 1.30 3.70 3N W +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 2-Smith-Smith
430 1.30 3.70 3N W +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
2 |
♠T95
♥Q8
♦J84
♣KT973
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.90 0.10 3N E -1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
150 3.10 1.90 2N W +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 2-Smith-Smith
150 3.10 1.90 2N E +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
200 1.30 3.70 3♠ S -2 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
400 0.10 4.90 3N E 3-Ford-Powell vs 5-Murdock-Winham
|
3 |
♠Q93
♥A43
♦KQ9
♣J963
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠4/5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.90 0.10 2N N 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
50 2.50 2.50 3N S -1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 2.50 2.50 3N N -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 2-Smith-Smith
50 2.50 2.50 3♣ N -1 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
150 0.10 4.90 3N N -3 3-Ford-Powell vs 5-Murdock-Winham
|
4 |
♠JT732
♥Q8
♦T2
♣QJT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.90 0.10 2N W -3 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
200 3.70 1.30 3N E -2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
100 2.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 2-Smith-Smith
110 1.30 3.70 2♥ E 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
300 0.10 4.90 2♠ N -3 3-Ford-Powell vs 5-Murdock-Winham
|
5 |
♠T952
♥5
♦KT9742
♣A5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2/3♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 5♣ E -1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Smith-Smith
130 3.50 1.50 3♣ W +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
130 3.50 1.50 3♣ W +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Wagener-Smith
150 2.00 3.00 3♣ W +2 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
400 1.00 4.00 5♣ W 6-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
460 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Murdock-Winham
|
6 |
♠J92
♥54
♦9753
♣AK42
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦0 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 7♦ 7♥ 7♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 5♠ E -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Wagener-Smith
620 4.00 1.00 5♦ E +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Smith-Smith
710 3.00 2.00 4♠ W +3 6-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
950 2.00 3.00 5♦* E +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
1370 1.00 4.00 6♦ E 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
1430 0.00 5.00 6♠ E 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Murdock-Winham
|
7 |
♠T8
♥KT975
♦T6
♣K753
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 5.00 0.00 2N N +2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Smith-Smith
170 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +2 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
170 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Wagener-Smith
140 2.00 3.00 1♠ S +2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
120 1.00 4.00 2N N 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Murdock-Winham
100 0.00 5.00 2N N -1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
8 |
♠KQJ9
♥J964
♦AT
♣A43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3/4♦ 2♥ ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 1.00 2N N 2-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Smith-Smith
120 4.00 1.00 2N N 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Murdock-Winham
120 4.00 1.00 1N N +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 1-Wagener-Smith
50 1.50 3.50 1N N -1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
50 1.50 3.50 1N N -1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 0.00 5.00 2♠ N -2 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
9 |
♠Q7
♥QT982
♦KT7
♣J94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ ♣2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ ♦4 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.30 0.70 4♥ S +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
450 4.30 0.70 4♥ S +1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Smith-Smith
420 2.50 2.50 4♥ S 2-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wagener-Smith
50 1.30 3.70 5♥ S -1 3-Ford-Powell vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
170 0.10 4.90 3♠ W +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
10 |
♠AKQJ
♥KQJ3
♦JT4
♣K6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 5♠ 5/4NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.70 1.30 4♥ S +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wagener-Smith
650 3.70 1.30 4♥ N +1 3-Ford-Powell vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
650 3.70 1.30 4♥ N +1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Smith-Smith
100 0.70 4.30 6♥ N -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
100 0.70 4.30 4♥ S -1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
11 |
♠AJ
♥K9
♦A982
♣AKQJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/5♣ 1/-♦ 6/5♠ 6/5NT ♦7/6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 4.30 0.70 6♠ S 3-Ford-Powell vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
980 4.30 0.70 6♠ S 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ S +1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Smith-Smith
200 1.30 3.70 3♠ S +2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wagener-Smith
50 0.10 4.90 6♠ S -1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
12 |
♠J83
♥K98642
♦98
♣T4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦1 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 6♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.90 0.10 6♠ W -1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Smith-Smith
420 3.70 1.30 4♠ W 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
480 1.90 3.10 5♠ W +1 3-Ford-Powell vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
480 1.90 3.10 4♠ W +2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Wagener-Smith
980 0.10 4.90 6♠ W 1-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
13 |
♠942
♥J5
♦A63
♣T8743
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 6♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.90 0.10 4♣ N -6 3-Ford-Powell vs 2-Smith-Smith
650 2.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Murdock-Winham
650 2.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
650 2.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
680 0.10 4.90 4♠ W +2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
|
14 |
♠AK97
♥T
♦9865
♣J876
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.90 0.10 4♥* E -1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 3.70 1.30 4♠ N -1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
100 2.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 3-Ford-Powell vs 2-Smith-Smith
170 1.30 3.70 3♥ E +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Murdock-Winham
570 0.10 4.90 2♥* E +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
|
15 |
♠QT964
♥AJ5
♦QT95
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2/3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.90 0.10 3♣ S +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
110 3.70 1.30 3♣ S 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 2.50 2.50 3♥ E -2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Murdock-Winham
50 1.30 3.70 3N E -1 3-Ford-Powell vs 2-Smith-Smith
200 0.10 4.90 4♣* S -1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
|
16 |
♠Q763
♥J94
♦62
♣8532
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥4 ♠2 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 7♦ 3♥ 5♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
640 4.90 0.10 5♣ E +2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
1470 2.50 2.50 6N W +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Murdock-Winham
1470 2.50 2.50 6N W +1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
1470 2.50 2.50 6N E +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
2220 0.10 4.90 7N E 3-Ford-Powell vs 2-Smith-Smith
|
17 |
♠AT
♥Q8
♦KT8
♣AK9873
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦4/5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.70 1.30 2♣ N 2-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
90 3.70 1.30 2♣ N 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
90 3.70 1.30 1♣ N +1 3-Ford-Powell vs 1-Wagener-Smith
50 0.70 4.30 2N N -1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Smith-Smith
50 0.70 4.30 3♣ N -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Murdock-Winham
|
18 |
♠9742
♥63
♦973
♣5432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥0 ♠0/1 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.90 0.10 2♥ W +3 3-Ford-Powell vs 1-Wagener-Smith
230 3.70 1.30 2♥ E +4 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Murdock-Winham
450 1.90 3.10 4♥ W +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
450 1.90 3.10 4♥ W +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Smith-Smith
480 0.10 4.90 4♥ W +2 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
19 |
♠A8
♥J9764
♦J653
♣K6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.90 0.10 4♥ W -2 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
120 3.70 1.30 1N W +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
170 2.50 2.50 2♠ W +2 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Smith-Smith
600 1.30 3.70 3N W 3-Ford-Powell vs 1-Wagener-Smith
630 0.10 4.90 3N W +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Murdock-Winham
|
20 |
♠J9742
♥J4
♦J
♣AK952
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 1♥ ♣7/6 ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♣6/5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.90 0.10 3♥ S -1 3-Ford-Powell vs 1-Wagener-Smith
130 3.70 1.30 3♦ W +1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
150 1.90 3.10 1N E +2 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Smith-Smith
150 1.90 3.10 3♦ E +2 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
300 0.10 4.90 3♣ N -3 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Murdock-Winham
|
21 |
♠AQ
♥97
♦KQJ32
♣AJ83
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.90 0.10 5♦ N 6-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 2.50 2.50 3N S -1 3-Ford-Powell vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
100 2.50 2.50 3N S -1 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 2-Smith-Smith
100 2.50 2.50 5♦ S -1 2-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Murdock-Winham
200 0.10 4.90 3N S -2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
22 |
♠T8
♥T8
♦JT532
♣AQ75
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.90 0.10 4♠ E +1 3-Ford-Powell vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
680 1.90 3.10 5♠ E +1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
680 1.90 3.10 4♠ E +2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
680 1.90 3.10 4♠ E +2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Murdock-Winham
680 1.90 3.10 4♠ E +2 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 2-Smith-Smith
|
23 |
♠T974
♥KJ5
♦AK4
♣Q84
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.90 0.10 2N W -2 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 2-Smith-Smith
110 3.10 1.90 2♠ E 6-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
110 3.10 1.90 3♣ E 3-Ford-Powell vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
140 1.30 3.70 2♠ E +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
150 0.10 4.90 1N W +2 2-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Murdock-Winham
|
24 |
♠AT7
♥JT5
♦QJ42
♣A74
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.90 0.10 1N N +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 3.10 1.90 3♦ N 3-Ford-Powell vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
110 3.10 1.90 3♦ N 6-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
PASS 1.30 3.70 Pass Out 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 2-Smith-Smith
140 0.10 4.90 3♠ W 2-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Murdock-Winham
|
25 |
♠AJ
♥AT5
♦AJT865
♣83
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 4NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.90 0.10 2♠ E -2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ N +1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Murdock-Winham
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ N +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
130 2.50 2.50 2♦ N +2 3-Ford-Powell vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
110 0.10 4.90 3♦ N 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 1-Wagener-Smith
|
26 |
♠T94
♥Q973
♦AJ7
♣942
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6/5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣7/6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.30 0.70 1N E -1 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 1-Wagener-Smith
100 4.30 0.70 1N E -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
110 1.90 3.10 3♦ E 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
110 1.90 3.10 2♦ W +1 3-Ford-Powell vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
120 0.10 4.90 1N E +1 6-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Murdock-Winham
|
27 |
♠873
♥643
♦K73
♣QJT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.90 0.10 2♠ W 6-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Murdock-Winham
140 1.90 3.10 3♠ W 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
140 1.90 3.10 2♥ E +1 3-Ford-Powell vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
140 1.90 3.10 2♥ E +1 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 1-Wagener-Smith
140 1.90 3.10 2♥ E +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
|
28 |
♠J73
♥KJT52
♦94
♣JT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2/1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.90 0.10 2♦ S +1 4-Turnquist-Dykstra vs 1-Wagener-Smith
100 3.70 1.30 2♦ S -1 3-Ford-Powell vs 6-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
120 2.50 2.50 1N E +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wilkinson-Gunter
200 1.30 3.70 2♦ S -2 6-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Murdock-Winham
300 0.10 4.90 3N S -3 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Oldden-Nicolaisen
|