1 |
♠AJ75
♥543
♦72
♣T432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 0.50 3N E -1 4-Sydes-Black vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Jones-Harken
140 0.50 2.50 3♠ E 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 5-Keen-Johnson
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ E +1 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 1-Wagener-Smith
|
2 |
♠AK8
♥T5
♦AQT74
♣932
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.50 0.50 4♦ N 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Jones-Harken
130 2.50 0.50 3♦ N +1 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 1-Wagener-Smith
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ E -2 4-Sydes-Black vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ E -2 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 5-Keen-Johnson
|
3 |
♠-
♥963
♦KT6543
♣8643
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4/5♥ 6♠ 6/1NT ♣3 ♦3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 2.00 1.00 5♠ E +1 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Jones-Harken
680 2.00 1.00 4♠ W +2 4-Sydes-Black vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
680 2.00 1.00 5♥ W +1 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 1-Wagener-Smith
1430 0.00 3.00 6♠ W 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 5-Keen-Johnson
|
4 |
♠984
♥KQ83
♦AT98
♣74
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 4-Sydes-Black vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ W 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 5-Keen-Johnson
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ W 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Jones-Harken
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ E 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 1-Wagener-Smith
|
5 |
♠J
♥K963
♦AKQ93
♣KQ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 6♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦1 ♥0 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1430 3.00 0.00 6♥ S 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
710 2.00 1.00 5♥ S +2 5-Keen-Johnson vs 3-Jones-Harken
680 0.50 2.50 4♥ S +2 1-Wagener-Smith vs 4-Sydes-Black
680 0.50 2.50 4♥ S +2 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
|
6 |
♠976
♥96
♦KQJ3
♣AT43
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 1.50 1.50 3N S +1 1-Wagener-Smith vs 4-Sydes-Black
430 1.50 1.50 3N S +1 5-Keen-Johnson vs 3-Jones-Harken
430 1.50 1.50 3N S +1 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
430 1.50 1.50 3N S +1 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
|
7 |
♠A5
♥AQJ84
♦54
♣KT73
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S 1-Wagener-Smith vs 4-Sydes-Black
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S 5-Keen-Johnson vs 3-Jones-Harken
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
|
8 |
♠QT943
♥KQT52
♦QT
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 5♣* E -1 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
100 2.00 1.00 5♥* S -1 5-Keen-Johnson vs 3-Jones-Harken
150 1.00 2.00 5♥ S -3 1-Wagener-Smith vs 4-Sydes-Black
400 0.00 3.00 5♣ E 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
|
9 |
♠A73
♥KJ8643
♦K8
♣Q7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.83 0.17 2♥ N +1 1-Wagener-Smith vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
50 0.83 2.17 4♥ N -1 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 4-Sydes-Black
50 0.83 2.17 4♥ N -1 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 3-Jones-Harken
|
10 |
♠A6
♥Q432
♦KT63
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2/1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.83 0.17 1N N +1 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 4-Sydes-Black
90 1.50 1.50 2♣ E 1-Wagener-Smith vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
100 0.17 2.83 2♥ N -1 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 3-Jones-Harken
|
11 |
♠QT94
♥Q5432
♦6
♣Q76
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1/-NT ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 NT7/6 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.83 0.17 4♠ S -1 1-Wagener-Smith vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
130 1.50 1.50 4♦ E 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 4-Sydes-Black
150 0.17 2.83 4♦ E +1 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 3-Jones-Harken
|
12 |
♠A4
♥K8643
♦T943
♣J3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.83 0.17 3N W 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 4-Sydes-Black
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ W 1-Wagener-Smith vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
430 0.17 2.83 3N W +1 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 3-Jones-Harken
|
13 |
♠AQ765
♥A
♦QJ32
♣JT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠4/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.50 0.50 3♥ E -2 3-Jones-Harken vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
200 2.50 0.50 2♥ E -2 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 4-Sydes-Black
110 1.00 2.00 3♦ N 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Keen-Johnson
100 0.00 3.00 2♥ E -1 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 1-Wagener-Smith
|
14 |
♠43
♥QT43
♦A932
♣842
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 2.50 0.50 2N E +2 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Keen-Johnson
180 2.50 0.50 2N E +2 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 4-Sydes-Black
430 1.00 2.00 3N E +1 3-Jones-Harken vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
460 0.00 3.00 3N E +2 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 1-Wagener-Smith
|
15 |
♠AT76
♥A
♦Q72
♣AK953
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 6♠ 6NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣1 ♦5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 3.00 0.00 5♠ S +1 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 1-Wagener-Smith
650 2.00 1.00 5♠ N 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Keen-Johnson
200 0.50 2.50 6♠ S -2 3-Jones-Harken vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
200 0.50 2.50 6♠ S -2 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 4-Sydes-Black
|
16 |
♠A73
♥Q
♦AQT96
♣AQ83
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ ♦6 ♥4/5 ♠4/5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4/5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.83 0.17 2♥ W -1 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 1-Wagener-Smith
50 1.50 1.50 3♣ N -1 3-Jones-Harken vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
100 0.17 2.83 2♣ N -2 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Keen-Johnson
|
17 |
♠84
♥A752
♦K97
♣AT92
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2NT ♣2 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.83 0.17 4♣ S 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 5-Keen-Johnson
50 1.50 1.50 3N W -1 4-Sydes-Black vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
90 0.17 2.83 2♦ W 3-Jones-Harken vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
|
18 |
♠982
♥QT8
♦T32
♣9763
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.83 0.17 2♥ S 3-Jones-Harken vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
50 1.50 1.50 1♠ E -1 4-Sydes-Black vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
200 0.17 2.83 2♥ S -2 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 5-Keen-Johnson
|
19 |
♠Q754
♥K4
♦KJT4
♣852
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♦6 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.83 0.17 1♠ N +1 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 5-Keen-Johnson
100 0.83 2.17 2♦ W -1 3-Jones-Harken vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
100 0.83 2.17 1♦ W -1 4-Sydes-Black vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
|
20 |
♠KT97543
♥5
♦A9764
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3/4♥ 5NT ♦3 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 2.83 0.17 4♦* N -2 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 5-Keen-Johnson
660 0.83 2.17 3N E +2 3-Jones-Harken vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
660 0.83 2.17 3N E +2 4-Sydes-Black vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
|
21 |
♠JT87
♥T87
♦KT
♣9542
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.83 0.17 6♠ E -1 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
420 0.83 2.17 4♠ E 5-Keen-Johnson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
420 0.83 2.17 4♠ E 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
|
22 |
♠Q2
♥AQ42
♦QT764
♣K6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 2.83 0.17 6♥ N 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
480 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 5-Keen-Johnson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
420 0.17 2.83 5♦ S +1 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
|
23 |
♠Q7
♥QJ96
♦953
♣KQ64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.83 0.17 1N N +1 5-Keen-Johnson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
400 0.17 2.83 2N N -4 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
|
24 |
♠A53
♥J963
♦7652
♣92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6/5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1/-♥ 2♠ 4/3NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.83 0.17 3N E -1 5-Keen-Johnson vs 1-Wagener-Smith
150 1.50 1.50 2N E +1 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
200 0.17 2.83 3N N -4 8-Hanson-Tainty vs 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch
|
25 |
♠76
♥KJ94
♦AKT973
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3/4♠ 1/2NT ♣6 ♥6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3/4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.83 0.17 2♠ S +2 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
50 0.83 2.17 3N S -1 3-Jones-Harken vs 1-Wagener-Smith
50 0.83 2.17 4♠ S -1 5-Keen-Johnson vs 4-Sydes-Black
|
26 |
♠A632
♥AJ5
♦KT
♣QT95
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♥6 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.83 0.17 2N N 3-Jones-Harken vs 1-Wagener-Smith
110 1.50 1.50 2♦ S +1 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
100 0.17 2.83 1♥ E -1 5-Keen-Johnson vs 4-Sydes-Black
|
27 |
♠J32
♥AT4
♦874
♣AQJ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ -/1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠3/4 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ S 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 5-Keen-Johnson vs 4-Sydes-Black
140 1.50 1.50 1♠ S +2 3-Jones-Harken vs 1-Wagener-Smith
|
28 |
♠T2
♥J87432
♦5
♣QJ54
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.83 0.17 3N W -1 5-Keen-Johnson vs 4-Sydes-Black
110 1.50 1.50 2♦ E +1 6-Oppenheimer-Burtch vs 2-Passaro-Vinnicombe
430 0.17 2.83 3N E +1 3-Jones-Harken vs 1-Wagener-Smith
|