1 |
♠K
♥83
♦J87432
♣AQJ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 5.00 0.00 3N S +2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
420 4.00 1.00 4♥ S 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Benich-Keen
400 2.00 3.00 3N S 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Murdock-Winham
400 2.00 3.00 3N S 6-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
400 2.00 3.00 3N S 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
140 0.00 5.00 3♥ S 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
|
2 |
♠8
♥AKQ72
♦K963
♣J53
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4/5♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ ♦1 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Murdock-Winham
620 4.00 1.00 4♥ N 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Benich-Keen
230 3.00 2.00 2♥ N +4 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
100 1.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
100 1.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
130 0.00 5.00 4♣ E 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
|
3 |
♠-
♥QT2
♦AQT84
♣87653
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3/2♦ 1♥ 3♠ NT5 |
EW: 2NT ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.50 1.50 3♠ S 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
110 1.00 4.00 1♠ S +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Benich-Keen
100 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -2 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Murdock-Winham
|
4 |
♠T52
♥6
♦K9753
♣J642
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♠ ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 5.00 0.00 4♦ N 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Benich-Keen
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ W 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ W 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
650 2.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
790 0.50 4.50 4♥* W 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Murdock-Winham
790 0.50 4.50 4♥* W 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
|
5 |
♠8653
♥J
♦AJ7432
♣AQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1/2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣6/7 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 1.00 4♠ S 1-Grant-Nelson vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
620 4.00 1.00 4♠ S 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 2-Wagener-Smith
620 4.00 1.00 4♠ S 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
170 2.00 3.00 3♠ S +1 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 4-Beard-Gunter
150 1.00 4.00 3♥ E -3 6-Benz-Suddards vs 1-Benich-Keen
200 0.00 5.00 3♦ N -2 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Murdock-Winham
|
6 |
♠KQ76
♥54
♦AT
♣98752
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 1/2NT ♣5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.50 0.50 4♥ E 1-Grant-Nelson vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
620 4.50 0.50 4♥ E 6-Benz-Suddards vs 1-Benich-Keen
650 1.50 3.50 5♥ E 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 2-Wagener-Smith
650 1.50 3.50 5♥ E 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Murdock-Winham
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 4-Beard-Gunter
|
7 |
♠T873
♥T9
♦97
♣T7642
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5/4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 5.00 0.00 1♦* S -2 6-Benz-Suddards vs 1-Benich-Keen
630 4.00 1.00 3N W +1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 2-Wagener-Smith
660 2.50 2.50 4N W +1 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Murdock-Winham
660 2.50 2.50 3N W +2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
800 1.00 4.00 1♦* S -3 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 4-Beard-Gunter
1100 0.00 5.00 1♦* S -4 1-Grant-Nelson vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
|
8 |
♠T4
♥KJ8763
♦5
♣K632
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 2♥ 7♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 4-Beard-Gunter
50 4.00 1.00 6♠ W -1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 1-Benich-Keen
130 3.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 2-Wagener-Smith
450 2.00 3.00 5♠ W 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
480 0.50 4.50 4♠ W +2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
480 0.50 4.50 4♠ W +2 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Murdock-Winham
|
9 |
♠AQ
♥T9863
♦9732
♣K7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 2-Wagener-Smith
100 4.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
110 3.00 2.00 2♣ W +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
140 2.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
600 1.00 4.00 3N W 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 1-Benich-Keen
650 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
|
10 |
♠KT9853
♥J98
♦-
♣J752
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5/6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
650 4.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 2-Wagener-Smith
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
170 0.00 5.00 3♠ N +1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 1-Benich-Keen
|
11 |
♠J874
♥85
♦Q953
♣T72
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 6♦ 3♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 1-Benich-Keen
400 4.00 1.00 3N E 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 2-Wagener-Smith
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
460 0.00 5.00 3N E +2 6-Benz-Suddards vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
|
12 |
♠QJT4
♥T97
♦AKJ54
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 5.00 0.00 3N N +3 6-Benz-Suddards vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
650 4.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
620 3.00 2.00 4♥ S 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 1-Benich-Keen
300 2.00 3.00 5♣* W -2 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
100 0.50 4.50 4♥ S -1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
100 0.50 4.50 4♥ S -1 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 2-Wagener-Smith
|
13 |
♠9653
♥AQJ9
♦KQ
♣A84
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 2-Wagener-Smith
170 4.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
170 4.00 1.00 2♥ N +2 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Beard-Gunter
140 2.00 3.00 2♥ N +1 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 1-Benich-Keen
120 0.50 4.50 1N N +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Murdock-Winham
120 0.50 4.50 1N N +1 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
|
14 |
♠KJ7
♥KJ53
♦84
♣A852
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦0 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 2♠ 3/4NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 5.00 0.00 5♦* E -2 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 1-Benich-Keen
100 4.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
50 3.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
420 2.00 3.00 4♠ W 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 2-Wagener-Smith
440 1.00 4.00 5♦ E +2 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Beard-Gunter
730 0.00 5.00 3♠* W +2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Murdock-Winham
|
15 |
♠J
♥K763
♦AKT7
♣AJ85
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 2♠ E 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 1-Benich-Keen
140 2.50 2.50 3♠ E 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 2-Wagener-Smith
140 2.50 2.50 3♠ E 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Beard-Gunter
140 2.50 2.50 3♠ E 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
140 2.50 2.50 2♠ E +1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
200 0.00 5.00 4♦ N -2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Murdock-Winham
|
16 |
♠KQ2
♥J32
♦K963
♣653
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 6♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
230 5.00 0.00 3♠ E +3 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 2-Wagener-Smith
650 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
650 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 1-Benich-Keen
650 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
680 0.50 4.50 4♠ E +2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Murdock-Winham
680 0.50 4.50 4♠ E +2 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Beard-Gunter
|
17 |
♠JT95
♥2
♦KT7
♣Q9432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 2♥ E +3 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ E 1-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Beard-Gunter
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ E 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 1-Benich-Keen
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ E 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
450 0.50 4.50 4♥ E +1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
450 0.50 4.50 4♥ E +1 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Wagener-Smith
|
18 |
♠AQT7
♥8652
♦K43
♣96
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3/2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
50 4.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Wagener-Smith
120 2.50 2.50 2N W 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
120 2.50 2.50 1N W +1 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 1-Benich-Keen
400 0.50 4.50 3N W 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
400 0.50 4.50 3N E 1-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Beard-Gunter
|
19 |
♠AT
♥KJT8
♦A753
♣843
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 3♦ N 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Wagener-Smith
50 3.00 2.00 4♦ N -1 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
50 3.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
50 3.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 1-Benich-Keen
100 1.00 4.00 4♦ N -2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
300 0.00 5.00 5♦* S -2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Beard-Gunter
|
20 |
♠8
♥AKQT4
♦953
♣AKQ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 1♥ N +2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Beard-Gunter
110 4.00 1.00 3♦ N 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
100 2.50 2.50 3N S -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
100 2.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Wagener-Smith
200 0.50 4.50 3♣ N -2 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 1-Benich-Keen
200 0.50 4.50 3♣ N -2 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
|
21 |
♠97
♥KQ42
♦754
♣J873
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1/-♠ 2NT ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.50 0.50 3N W -2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Beard-Gunter
100 4.50 0.50 5♦ W -2 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
180 3.00 2.00 1N W +3 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
400 1.50 3.50 3N W 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
400 1.50 3.50 3N W 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Wagener-Smith
430 0.00 5.00 3N W +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Murdock-Winham
|
22 |
♠QJ85
♥9
♦Q9765
♣AKJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 5♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 3♠ S -3 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
620 4.00 1.00 4♥ W 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Wagener-Smith
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Beard-Gunter
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Murdock-Winham
|
23 |
♠AKQ75
♥T52
♦3
♣JT96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 6-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Murdock-Winham
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ N 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Beard-Gunter
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Wagener-Smith
100 1.00 4.00 3♠ N -1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
200 0.00 5.00 4♠ N -2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
|
24 |
♠J862
♥AQ65
♦KJ
♣KJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ -/1♠ -/1NT ♣5 ♠6/7 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
50 4.00 1.00 2N N -1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Murdock-Winham
100 2.00 3.00 1N N -2 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Wagener-Smith
100 2.00 3.00 1N N -2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 4-Beard-Gunter
100 2.00 3.00 3♣ N -2 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
140 0.00 5.00 2♥ E +1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
|
25 |
♠JT7543
♥764
♦3
♣952
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 7♥ 5♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 3.50 1.50 3N W +3 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 4-Beard-Gunter
690 3.50 1.50 3N W +3 6-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
690 3.50 1.50 3N E +3 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Benich-Keen
690 3.50 1.50 3N E +3 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
1440 0.50 4.50 6N W 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 6-Murdock-Winham
1440 0.50 4.50 6N W 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
|
26 |
♠AKT982
♥T5
♦QJ
♣J97
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 NT4 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 6♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 2♠ S -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
110 4.00 1.00 3♦ W 6-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ W 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Benich-Keen
150 2.00 3.00 4♦ W +1 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 6-Murdock-Winham
680 0.50 4.50 4♥ W +2 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 4-Beard-Gunter
680 0.50 4.50 4♥ E +2 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
|
27 |
♠K9
♥K8542
♦743
♣J72
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.50 0.50 3N E -1 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 4-Beard-Gunter
50 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Benich-Keen
150 3.00 2.00 3♦ E +2 6-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
400 2.00 3.00 3N E 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 6-Murdock-Winham
420 1.00 4.00 4♠ E 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
430 0.00 5.00 3N E +1 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
|
28 |
♠T3
♥KQT97
♦KQ93
♣Q9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT5 |
EW: 2/3♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
110 4.00 1.00 2♠ S 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
100 3.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 3-Wilkinson-Ray
200 2.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 2-Matthews-Cooper vs 4-Beard-Gunter
300 0.50 4.50 4♠ S -3 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 6-Murdock-Winham
300 0.50 4.50 4♠ S -3 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Benich-Keen
|
29 |
♠765
♥J854
♦Q42
♣J43
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 5.00 0.00 5♠ E 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
680 3.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
680 3.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
710 1.50 3.50 4♠ E +3 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 2-Wagener-Smith
710 1.50 3.50 4♠ E +3 6-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Beard-Gunter
1440 0.00 5.00 6N W 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 6-Murdock-Winham
|
30 |
♠QJ96
♥Q52
♦Q3
♣AQJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♠ 5NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 5.00 0.00 4♠ N 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 2-Wagener-Smith
400 4.00 1.00 5♣ N 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
200 3.00 2.00 2♠ N +3 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 6-Murdock-Winham
170 2.00 3.00 3♣ S +3 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
130 1.00 4.00 2♣ N +2 6-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Beard-Gunter
100 0.00 5.00 4♣ S -2 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
|
31 |
♠K32
♥KT5
♦AQJ72
♣K6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 5.00 0.00 3N N 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
130 4.00 1.00 2♦ N +2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 2-Wagener-Smith
100 1.50 3.50 3N N -1 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
100 1.50 3.50 3N N -1 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
100 1.50 3.50 3N N -1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Beard-Gunter
100 1.50 3.50 3N N -1 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 6-Murdock-Winham
|
32 |
♠T6
♥5
♦QT94
♣KJT865
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.50 0.50 5♥* E -1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Beard-Gunter
200 4.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 5-Harken-McIntosh vs 2-Wagener-Smith
100 3.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 7-Keay-Klimowski vs 6-Murdock-Winham
50 2.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 8-Edmondson-Flowers vs 8-Oldden-Nicolaisen
170 1.00 4.00 3♥ E +1 3-Turnquist-Powell vs 5-Johnson-Clancey
300 0.00 5.00 5♣* N -2 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 7-Kuhlmann-Black
|