1 |
♠K95
♥KJ8
♦Q7632
♣82
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 4♠ 1/2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 8-Wagener-Smith vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -2 9-Stevens-Ford vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -2 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Haley-Tainty
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ W 5-Jones-Murdock vs 2-Henderson-Benich
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
|
2 |
♠984
♥9765
♦QT43
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6/5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♦ W -4 5-Jones-Murdock vs 2-Henderson-Benich
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -3 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ S 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Haley-Tainty
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ S 8-Wagener-Smith vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ S 9-Stevens-Ford vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
|
3 |
♠65
♥K9654
♦A98
♣QT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1♦ 6♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥1 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 2.50 1.50 6♥ S 5-Jones-Murdock vs 2-Henderson-Benich
980 2.50 1.50 6♥ S 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
980 2.50 1.50 6♥ S 8-Wagener-Smith vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
980 2.50 1.50 6♥ S 9-Stevens-Ford vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
480 0.00 4.00 4♥ S +2 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Haley-Tainty
|
4 |
♠K63
♥JT863
♦A3
♣J65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.88 0.13 Pass Out 1-Haley-Tainty vs 8-Wagener-Smith
110 2.63 1.38 2♥ N 9-Stevens-Ford vs 5-Jones-Murdock
PASS 1.38 2.63 Pass Out 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
110 0.13 3.88 1♠ E +1 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 2-Henderson-Benich
|
5 |
♠Q5
♥T743
♦KJT
♣JT63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6/5 ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.88 0.13 1N N +2 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 2-Henderson-Benich
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ N 1-Haley-Tainty vs 8-Wagener-Smith
100 1.38 2.63 4♦ E -2 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ E 9-Stevens-Ford vs 5-Jones-Murdock
|
6 |
♠KQ753
♥QJ4
♦JT7
♣T7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 3.88 0.13 2N W +2 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
200 2.63 1.38 4♥ S -4 9-Stevens-Ford vs 5-Jones-Murdock
600 1.38 2.63 3N E 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 2-Henderson-Benich
630 0.13 3.88 3N W +1 1-Haley-Tainty vs 8-Wagener-Smith
|
7 |
♠J4
♥AK642
♦654
♣963
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.25 0.75 2♠ S +2 2-Henderson-Benich vs 9-Stevens-Ford
170 3.25 0.75 2♠ S +2 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
140 1.38 2.63 2N E 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 8-Wagener-Smith
100 0.13 3.88 2♠ S -1 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 5-Jones-Murdock
|
8 |
♠AKJ432
♥7
♦K
♣T9854
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣1 ♦6 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.88 0.13 4♠ N 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 8-Wagener-Smith
300 2.63 1.38 4♥* E -2 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
200 1.38 2.63 3♠ N +2 2-Henderson-Benich vs 9-Stevens-Ford
140 0.13 3.88 3♠ N 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 5-Jones-Murdock
|
9 |
♠J9843
♥982
♦J9
♣K65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.88 0.13 2♠ S 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 5-Jones-Murdock
50 2.63 1.38 2♠ N -1 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 8-Wagener-Smith
100 1.38 2.63 2N S -2 2-Henderson-Benich vs 9-Stevens-Ford
150 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -3 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
|
10 |
♠J93
♥K76
♦KQ
♣J9763
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.88 0.13 2N E 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 9-Stevens-Ford
600 2.00 2.00 3N E 2-Henderson-Benich vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
600 2.00 2.00 3N E 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
630 0.13 3.88 3N E +1 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
|
11 |
♠JT9432
♥J6
♦T95
♣84
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 6/4♣ 5/3♦ 3♥ 1/-♠ 5/4NT ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.88 0.13 3♣ W +3 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
420 2.63 1.38 5♣ W +1 2-Henderson-Benich vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
430 1.38 2.63 3N W +1 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
490 0.13 3.88 3N W +3 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 9-Stevens-Ford
|
12 |
♠T642
♥AQ9
♦QJT9
♣85
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1/-♠ 2/3NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5/4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.25 0.75 3N N +1 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 9-Stevens-Ford
630 3.25 0.75 3N N +1 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
100 1.38 2.63 2♣ S -1 2-Henderson-Benich vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
200 0.13 3.88 3N S -2 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
|
13 |
♠97
♥A873
♦K832
♣KT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.88 0.13 2♥ W -4 1-Haley-Tainty vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
140 2.63 1.38 1♥ N +2 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe
120 1.38 2.63 1N N +1 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 5-Jones-Murdock
200 0.13 3.88 2N N -2 9-Stevens-Ford vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
|
14 |
♠AQ82
♥-
♦AQT652
♣AKQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♦ 1♥ 3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥6 ♠2/3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 3.88 0.13 3N S +2 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 5-Jones-Murdock
420 2.63 1.38 5♣ S +1 1-Haley-Tainty vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
400 0.75 3.25 5♦ S 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe
400 0.75 3.25 5♦ N 9-Stevens-Ford vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
|
15 |
♠AQ643
♥54
♦K65
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 3/4♦ -/1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♥6/7 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 3N W -2 1-Haley-Tainty vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
110 2.63 1.38 3♦ W 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 5-Jones-Murdock
130 1.38 2.63 3♦ W +1 9-Stevens-Ford vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
150 0.13 3.88 3♦ W +2 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe
|
16 |
♠7
♥8743
♦JT98532
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♥ 5♠ 5/3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 6♠* W -2 1-Haley-Tainty vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
200 3.00 1.00 5♠ W -2 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
100 2.00 2.00 6N E -1 4-Wald-Hamlin vs 9-Stevens-Ford
600 1.00 3.00 3N E 2-Henderson-Benich vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 8-Wagener-Smith vs 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe
|
17 |
♠AT
♥A5
♦AK98
♣QJ987
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♦ 5♥ 4♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥2 ♠3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1020 3.50 0.50 6N N +1 1-Haley-Tainty vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
1020 3.50 0.50 6N N +1 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
990 2.00 2.00 6N N 2-Henderson-Benich vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
520 1.00 3.00 3N N +4 8-Wagener-Smith vs 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ S +1 4-Wald-Hamlin vs 9-Stevens-Ford
|
18 |
♠J9832
♥JT52
♦93
♣T2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 5♣ W -3 4-Wald-Hamlin vs 9-Stevens-Ford
100 3.00 1.00 6♣ E -2 2-Henderson-Benich vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
50 1.50 2.50 6N E -1 8-Wagener-Smith vs 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe
50 1.50 2.50 6N E -1 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
990 0.00 4.00 6N E 1-Haley-Tainty vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
|
19 |
♠T
♥J97432
♦QT87
♣84
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 4♦ W -3 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 9-Stevens-Ford
200 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -2 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ W -1 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
150 1.00 3.00 4♣ S -3 5-Jones-Murdock vs 1-Haley-Tainty
250 0.00 4.00 4♣ S -5 2-Henderson-Benich vs 8-Wagener-Smith
|
20 |
♠AQ92
♥9
♦KJ853
♣754
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 4NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 5-Jones-Murdock vs 1-Haley-Tainty
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
120 2.00 2.00 2N E 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 9-Stevens-Ford
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 2-Henderson-Benich vs 8-Wagener-Smith
|
21 |
♠AT4
♥Q7653
♦QJ
♣T76
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 1N S +1 5-Jones-Murdock vs 1-Haley-Tainty
90 3.00 1.00 1N S 2-Henderson-Benich vs 8-Wagener-Smith
80 2.00 2.00 1♥ N 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ N -1 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 7-Goodell-Goodell
200 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -2 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 9-Stevens-Ford
|
22 |
♠42
♥Q97
♦K843
♣A753
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3/2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ N +1 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 8-Wagener-Smith
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Henderson-Benich
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +2 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 1-Haley-Tainty
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Jones-Murdock
|
23 |
♠QJ9
♥T
♦AKQT652
♣Q5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ N +1 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ N +1 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 1-Haley-Tainty
130 3.00 1.00 2♦ N +2 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Jones-Murdock
100 1.00 3.00 5♦ N -1 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Henderson-Benich
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 8-Wagener-Smith
|
24 |
♠85
♥AKQJ64
♦92
♣QT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦1 ♠0 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 6♦ 7♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
260 4.00 0.00 3♠ E +4 12-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 8-Wagener-Smith
480 3.00 1.00 5♠ E +1 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 4-Wald-Hamlin
510 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +3 7-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Jones-Murdock
510 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +3 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Henderson-Benich
510 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +3 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe vs 1-Haley-Tainty
|
25 |
♠J8
♥KJ94
♦T5
♣QT962
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3/2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 3.25 0.75 3N S +1 4-Wald-Hamlin vs 1-Haley-Tainty
430 3.25 0.75 3N S +1 5-Jones-Murdock vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
180 1.38 2.63 2N S +2 8-Wagener-Smith vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
120 0.13 3.88 1N S +1 2-Henderson-Benich vs 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe
|
26 |
♠Q42
♥Q9
♦Q65
♣QT643
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.88 0.13 2♠ S 8-Wagener-Smith vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
170 2.63 1.38 3♥ E +1 4-Wald-Hamlin vs 1-Haley-Tainty
200 1.38 2.63 3♦ S -2 2-Henderson-Benich vs 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe
620 0.13 3.88 4♥ E 5-Jones-Murdock vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
|
27 |
♠J432
♥T9
♦32
♣A9653
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
230 3.88 0.13 1♥ W +5 2-Henderson-Benich vs 11-Passaro-Vinnicombe
480 2.00 2.00 5♥ E +1 5-Jones-Murdock vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +2 8-Wagener-Smith vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
510 0.13 3.88 5♥ E +2 4-Wald-Hamlin vs 1-Haley-Tainty
|