1 |
♠32
♥74
♦KT9853
♣AJT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3/2 ♠5 NT3/2 |
EW: 4/3♣ 1♦ 5/4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ W 4-Balassi-Basilico vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
150 4.00 1.00 2N E +1 1-Ray-Dau vs 3-Martin-Harken
170 3.00 2.00 2♥ W +2 5-Benich-Pierce vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
420 2.00 3.00 4♥ E 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
430 0.50 4.50 3N E +1 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 10-Hill-Belden
430 0.50 4.50 3N E +1 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 11-Perkins-Smith
|
2 |
♠KQ543
♥K32
♦A
♣AT73
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 5.00 0.00 5♣* W -4 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 10-Hill-Belden
300 4.00 1.00 4♣* W -2 4-Balassi-Basilico vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
150 3.00 2.00 4♣ W -3 5-Benich-Pierce vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
50 1.50 3.50 3♣ W -1 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
50 1.50 3.50 3♣ W -1 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 11-Perkins-Smith
200 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -2 1-Ray-Dau vs 3-Martin-Harken
|
3 |
♠943
♥QT93
♦A64
♣A98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2/3♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
110 4.00 1.00 2♣ E +1 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
150 3.00 2.00 2N E +1 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
600 2.00 3.00 3N E 3-Martin-Harken vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
630 1.00 4.00 3N E +1 5-Benich-Pierce vs 10-Hill-Belden
660 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 1-Ray-Dau vs 11-Perkins-Smith
|
4 |
♠AT53
♥T52
♦QJ6
♣983
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 1.50 3N W -1 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
100 3.50 1.50 3N E -1 1-Ray-Dau vs 11-Perkins-Smith
100 3.50 1.50 3N E -1 5-Benich-Pierce vs 10-Hill-Belden
100 3.50 1.50 3N E -1 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
PASS 1.00 4.00 Pass Out 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
150 0.00 5.00 3♣ W +2 3-Martin-Harken vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
|
5 |
♠AKJ732
♥Q8742
♦6
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣2 ♦1 ♥5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 5.00 0.00 6♣* W -2 4-Balassi-Basilico vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
50 4.00 1.00 4♦ W -1 3-Martin-Harken vs 5-Benich-Pierce
100 2.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
100 2.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 1-Ray-Dau
500 0.50 4.50 5♠* N -2 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
500 0.50 4.50 3♠* N -2 9-Cohen-Flowers vs 10-Hill-Belden
|
6 |
♠KQ3
♥AJ94
♦Q754
♣95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1/-♠ 2NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 5.00 0.00 3N N 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 1-Ray-Dau
200 4.00 1.00 1♥* W -1 4-Balassi-Basilico vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
150 3.00 2.00 3♦ S +2 9-Cohen-Flowers vs 10-Hill-Belden
120 2.00 3.00 2N N 3-Martin-Harken vs 5-Benich-Pierce
50 1.00 4.00 3N N -1 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
200 0.00 5.00 3N N -4 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
|
7 |
♠A532
♥73
♦KQT5
♣Q84
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3/2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 3♠ N 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 1-Ray-Dau
130 4.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
120 3.00 2.00 1N S +1 10-Hill-Belden vs 11-Perkins-Smith
100 2.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 3-Martin-Harken vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
200 0.50 4.50 3N S -2 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
200 0.50 4.50 4♠ N -2 5-Benich-Pierce vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
|
8 |
♠43
♥K8652
♦QJ74
♣K3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2/3♥ 3/2♠ 3/2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 3N E -1 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
110 4.00 1.00 3♣ W 10-Hill-Belden vs 11-Perkins-Smith
120 3.00 2.00 2N E 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 1-Ray-Dau
150 1.00 4.00 2N E +1 3-Martin-Harken vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
150 1.00 4.00 2N E +1 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
150 1.00 4.00 2♥ N -3 5-Benich-Pierce vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
|
9 |
♠T64
♥T732
♦43
♣K974
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2/1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3N E -2 4-Balassi-Basilico vs 1-Ray-Dau
100 4.00 1.00 2♦ E -1 5-Benich-Pierce vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
110 3.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 11-Perkins-Smith vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
130 2.00 3.00 2♦ E +2 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
150 0.50 4.50 1N E +2 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
150 0.50 4.50 2♦ W +3 9-Cohen-Flowers vs 3-Martin-Harken
|
10 |
♠AQJ4
♥K
♦9865
♣QJ43
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.50 0.50 3N S 4-Balassi-Basilico vs 1-Ray-Dau
600 4.50 0.50 3N S 11-Perkins-Smith vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ N 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
100 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 5-Benich-Pierce vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
100 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
200 0.00 5.00 4♠ N -2 9-Cohen-Flowers vs 3-Martin-Harken
|
11 |
♠QJT7
♥J85
♦A4
♣JT52
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ 1/-NT ♣6 ♦5 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.50 0.50 3♠ N 9-Cohen-Flowers vs 1-Ray-Dau
140 4.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 10-Hill-Belden vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ N 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 3-Martin-Harken
50 2.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 11-Perkins-Smith
100 0.50 4.50 2N N -2 5-Benich-Pierce vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
100 0.50 4.50 3♥ S -2 12-Gamble-Spencer vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
|
12 |
♠75
♥AQJ974
♦T84
♣T4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 5/4♣ 6♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -2 10-Hill-Belden vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
170 4.00 1.00 3♦ E +3 5-Benich-Pierce vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
420 2.00 3.00 5♦ W +1 12-Gamble-Spencer vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
420 2.00 3.00 5♦ E +1 9-Cohen-Flowers vs 1-Ray-Dau
420 2.00 3.00 5♣ W +1 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 11-Perkins-Smith
460 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 3-Martin-Harken
|
13 |
♠QT72
♥A86
♦4
♣J8653
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
100 4.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 11-Perkins-Smith vs 5-Benich-Pierce
170 3.00 2.00 1♥ W +3 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ W 10-Hill-Belden vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ W 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Ray-Dau
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ W 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
|
14 |
♠A9
♥KQ83
♦AJ73
♣T93
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 2N N +1 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
120 3.00 2.00 1N N +1 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
120 3.00 2.00 1N N +1 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
120 3.00 2.00 1N N +1 11-Perkins-Smith vs 5-Benich-Pierce
90 0.50 4.50 1N N 10-Hill-Belden vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
90 0.50 4.50 1N N 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Ray-Dau
|
15 |
♠K73
♥9643
♦98
♣QJT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 1.00 7N E -1 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
50 4.00 1.00 6N W -1 1-Ray-Dau vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
50 4.00 1.00 6N W -1 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 10-Hill-Belden
200 2.00 3.00 3♥ E +2 11-Perkins-Smith vs 3-Martin-Harken
460 1.00 4.00 3N W +2 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 5-Benich-Pierce
980 0.00 5.00 6♥ E 9-Cohen-Flowers vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
|
16 |
♠AJ75
♥K97
♦A92
♣952
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.50 0.50 3♥ S +1 7-Rodgers-Winham vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
170 4.50 0.50 3♥ S +1 11-Perkins-Smith vs 3-Martin-Harken
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ S 1-Ray-Dau vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ S +1 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 10-Hill-Belden
110 1.00 4.00 2♥ N 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 5-Benich-Pierce
PASS 0.00 5.00 Pass Out 9-Cohen-Flowers vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
|
17 |
♠K75
♥AKQ82
♦543
♣72
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.50 0.50 4N N 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
430 4.50 0.50 3N N +1 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 5-Benich-Pierce
400 2.50 2.50 5♦ S 10-Hill-Belden vs 1-Ray-Dau
400 2.50 2.50 5♦ S 12-Gamble-Spencer vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
150 0.50 4.50 3♦ S +2 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Martin-Harken
150 0.50 4.50 2♦ S +3 9-Cohen-Flowers vs 11-Perkins-Smith
|
18 |
♠AJ3
♥KT
♦QT42
♣A743
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 3♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 5.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
500 4.00 1.00 5♥* W -3 8-Wasserstrom-Pender vs 5-Benich-Pierce
300 3.00 2.00 4♥* W -2 10-Hill-Belden vs 1-Ray-Dau
150 2.00 3.00 4♥ W -3 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Martin-Harken
140 1.00 4.00 2♠ N +1 12-Gamble-Spencer vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
140 0.00 5.00 3♥ W 9-Cohen-Flowers vs 11-Perkins-Smith
|
19 |
♠AJ6
♥KQ54
♦Q942
♣52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 3♥ N 10-Hill-Belden vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
120 3.00 2.00 2N S 1-Ray-Dau vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
120 3.00 2.00 2N S 11-Perkins-Smith vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
120 3.00 2.00 2N S 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 5-Benich-Pierce
110 1.00 4.00 3♦ S 3-Martin-Harken vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
90 0.00 5.00 2♦ N 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
|
20 |
♠8
♥AKT876
♦KQ
♣KQ86
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 5.00 0.00 3N S +2 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 5-Benich-Pierce
650 4.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
620 2.00 3.00 4♥ N 3-Martin-Harken vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
620 2.00 3.00 4♥ N 10-Hill-Belden vs 12-Gamble-Spencer
620 2.00 3.00 4♥ N 11-Perkins-Smith vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
200 0.00 5.00 6♥ N -2 1-Ray-Dau vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
|
21 |
♠Q85
♥J4
♦42
♣JT8652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦0 ♥0 ♠5 NT0 |
EW: 2♣ 6♦ 6♥ 2/1♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 3.50 1.50 5♥ E +1 10-Hill-Belden vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
480 3.50 1.50 5♥ E +1 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 4-Balassi-Basilico vs 5-Benich-Pierce
980 0.50 4.50 6♥ E 11-Perkins-Smith vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
980 0.50 4.50 6♥ E 12-Gamble-Spencer vs 3-Martin-Harken
|
22 |
♠Q72
♥A92
♦AQ6
♣A976
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 5.00 0.00 3N N 11-Perkins-Smith vs 13-Friedberg-Llacera
180 4.00 1.00 2N N +2 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
150 1.50 3.50 2N S +1 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
150 1.50 3.50 2N N +1 4-Balassi-Basilico vs 5-Benich-Pierce
150 1.50 3.50 2N N +1 10-Hill-Belden vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
150 1.50 3.50 2N N +1 12-Gamble-Spencer vs 3-Martin-Harken
|
23 |
♠97542
♥9
♦T8732
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ E 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ E 11-Perkins-Smith vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ E 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 3-Martin-Harken vs 10-Hill-Belden
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 12-Gamble-Spencer vs 1-Ray-Dau
|
24 |
♠K3
♥KT542
♦T
♣A9753
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 11-Perkins-Smith vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
110 4.00 1.00 2♥ N 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
100 3.00 2.00 4♠ W -2 12-Gamble-Spencer vs 1-Ray-Dau
50 1.50 3.50 3♠ W -1 3-Martin-Harken vs 10-Hill-Belden
50 1.50 3.50 3♠ W -1 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 4-Balassi-Basilico
300 0.00 5.00 5♥* N -2 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 7-Rodgers-Winham
|
25 |
♠75
♥T63
♦KJT
♣AJ975
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♥ ♣6 ♦5/4 ♥7/6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2/1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 2♦ W -2 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
100 4.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 12-Gamble-Spencer vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
50 3.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 1-Ray-Dau vs 5-Benich-Pierce
90 2.00 3.00 2♦ E 3-Martin-Harken vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
100 1.00 4.00 2♠ S -2 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 10-Hill-Belden
130 0.00 5.00 2♦ E +2 4-Balassi-Basilico vs 11-Perkins-Smith
|
26 |
♠AK63
♥9853
♦752
♣Q4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 5.00 0.00 3♣ N +1 12-Gamble-Spencer vs 9-Cohen-Flowers
100 3.50 1.50 1N E -1 13-Friedberg-Llacera vs 2-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
100 3.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 1-Ray-Dau vs 5-Benich-Pierce
90 2.00 3.00 2♣ S 14-Edmondson-Nicolaisen vs 10-Hill-Belden
110 1.00 4.00 2♠ E 4-Balassi-Basilico vs 11-Perkins-Smith
120 0.00 5.00 1N W +1 3-Martin-Harken vs 8-Wasserstrom-Pender
|