1 |
♠9
♥K4
♦KT6
♣AQJ8542
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1/2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 5.00 0.00 3N S +2 9-Simon-Simon vs 7-Tainty-Haley
400 3.50 1.50 3N N 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
400 3.50 1.50 5♣ N 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
150 2.00 3.00 3♣ N +2 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 2-Cole-Litvak
50 0.50 4.50 3N S -1 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Harken-Jones
50 0.50 4.50 5♣ N -1 3-Ford-Stevens vs 11-Suddards-Henderson
|
2 |
♠AJ5
♥KT8
♦K4
♣AKJ64
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 6/5♥ 3♠ 6/1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 1.00 5♥ S 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
650 4.00 1.00 5♥ S 9-Simon-Simon vs 7-Tainty-Haley
650 4.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 3-Ford-Stevens vs 11-Suddards-Henderson
620 2.00 3.00 4♥ S 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 2-Cole-Litvak
130 1.00 4.00 3♣ N +1 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Harken-Jones
200 0.00 5.00 7♥ S -2 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
|
3 |
♠A85
♥Q6
♦Q97543
♣K2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 3♦ 5/4♥ 1/-♠ 5/4NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1100 5.00 0.00 4♠* E -4 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ S 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 2-Cole-Litvak
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ S 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Harken-Jones
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ S 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
100 0.50 4.50 3♠ E -1 3-Ford-Stevens vs 11-Suddards-Henderson
100 0.50 4.50 3♠ E -1 9-Simon-Simon vs 7-Tainty-Haley
|
4 |
♠J9
♥AKQ853
♦A432
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1440 5.00 0.00 6N S 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Ford-Stevens
720 4.00 1.00 3N S +4 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 4-Harken-Jones
680 3.00 2.00 5♠ S +1 9-Simon-Simon vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
650 2.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 2-Cole-Litvak
600 1.00 4.00 5♣ S 7-Tainty-Haley vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
100 0.00 5.00 3N S -1 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
|
5 |
♠A652
♥83
♦K7
♣AT982
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3♥ E -4 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 2-Cole-Litvak
150 4.00 1.00 4♥ E -3 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 4-Harken-Jones
100 3.00 2.00 3♥ E -2 9-Simon-Simon vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
110 2.00 3.00 3♦ W 7-Tainty-Haley vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
400 0.50 4.50 3N E 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
400 0.50 4.50 3N E 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Ford-Stevens
|
6 |
♠KT7
♥632
♦KQT983
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥6 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 5.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 9-Simon-Simon vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
200 4.00 1.00 2♥ E -2 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 4-Harken-Jones
150 2.00 3.00 4♦ N +1 7-Tainty-Haley vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
150 2.00 3.00 3♦ N +2 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
150 2.00 3.00 3♦ N +2 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 2-Cole-Litvak
50 0.00 5.00 3♣ S -1 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Ford-Stevens
|
7 |
♠KQ96
♥J7543
♦653
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 1N W -2 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 7-Tainty-Haley vs 4-Harken-Jones
110 3.00 2.00 2♥ S 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
100 2.00 3.00 1N W -1 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 3-Ford-Stevens
90 1.00 4.00 1N E 2-Cole-Litvak vs 9-Simon-Simon
130 0.00 5.00 2♣ E +2 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
|
8 |
♠QT4
♥J762
♦QT
♣J864
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT4/3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -2 7-Tainty-Haley vs 4-Harken-Jones
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -2 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 3-Ford-Stevens
50 3.00 2.00 3N E -1 2-Cole-Litvak vs 9-Simon-Simon
120 2.00 3.00 2N E 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
400 1.00 4.00 3N E 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
460 0.00 5.00 3N E +2 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
|
9 |
♠9
♥AJ
♦QJT543
♣T832
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 5♥ 6♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 3-Ford-Stevens
200 4.00 1.00 2♠ W +3 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
620 3.00 2.00 4♠ W 2-Cole-Litvak vs 9-Simon-Simon
680 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
680 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 7-Tainty-Haley vs 4-Harken-Jones
690 0.00 5.00 3N E +3 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
|
10 |
♠AT87
♥43
♦JT8542
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 4.50 0.50 4♠* W -3 3-Ford-Stevens vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
800 4.50 0.50 3♦* W -3 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
110 3.00 2.00 3♣ S 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 4-Harken-Jones
100 1.50 3.50 3♠ W -1 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 9-Simon-Simon
100 1.50 3.50 3♠ E -1 2-Cole-Litvak vs 7-Tainty-Haley
140 0.00 5.00 3♠ W 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
|
11 |
♠7
♥JT953
♦982
♣KQJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 4.50 0.50 2N N +2 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
180 4.50 0.50 2N N +2 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 4-Harken-Jones
170 3.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 3-Ford-Stevens vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
140 2.00 3.00 3♥ N 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 9-Simon-Simon
50 1.00 4.00 2N S -1 2-Cole-Litvak vs 7-Tainty-Haley
100 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -2 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
|
12 |
♠AQ93
♥KT9
♦T7
♣J875
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 3/4♥ 3/4♠ 2/4NT ♦4 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 5.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
620 4.00 1.00 4♠ N 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
100 2.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 2-Cole-Litvak vs 7-Tainty-Haley
100 2.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 3-Ford-Stevens vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
100 2.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 4-Harken-Jones
200 0.00 5.00 3N N -2 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 9-Simon-Simon
|
13 |
♠T6
♥8653
♦A852
♣KT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 5.00 0.00 1N N +1 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
110 4.00 1.00 2♠ S 3-Ford-Stevens vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
100 3.00 2.00 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 7-Tainty-Haley
90 1.50 3.50 1N N 4-Harken-Jones vs 2-Cole-Litvak
90 1.50 3.50 1N N 9-Simon-Simon vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
100 0.00 5.00 2♣ S -1 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
|
14 |
♠Q
♥T732
♦T98
♣J8763
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 3♣ W -3 4-Harken-Jones vs 2-Cole-Litvak
110 4.00 1.00 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 7-Tainty-Haley
50 2.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
50 2.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
100 0.50 4.50 3N N -2 9-Simon-Simon vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
100 0.50 4.50 3♠* S -1 3-Ford-Stevens vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
|
15 |
♠-
♥T92
♦AKQ53
♣KQJ54
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3/4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 5.00 0.00 2♣ N +2 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
110 4.00 1.00 3♣ N 9-Simon-Simon vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
90 3.00 2.00 1N W 3-Ford-Stevens vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
100 2.00 3.00 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 7-Tainty-Haley
200 0.50 4.50 3N S -2 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
200 0.50 4.50 5♣ N -2 4-Harken-Jones vs 2-Cole-Litvak
|
16 |
♠7
♥J962
♦K982
♣AT52
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 4-Harken-Jones vs 9-Simon-Simon
140 4.50 0.50 2♥ N +1 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 11-Suddards-Henderson
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ S 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Tainty-Haley
100 2.00 3.00 3♣ W -1 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 3-Ford-Stevens
50 1.00 4.00 2♠ N -1 2-Cole-Litvak vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
110 0.00 5.00 3♣ W 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
|
17 |
♠Q7
♥AQ7
♦A975
♣K932
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2/3♥ 4♠ 2/3NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 4-Harken-Jones vs 9-Simon-Simon
50 4.50 0.50 2♥ E -1 2-Cole-Litvak vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ E 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Tainty-Haley
170 1.50 3.50 3♠ E +1 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 11-Suddards-Henderson
170 1.50 3.50 2♠ E +2 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
420 0.00 5.00 4♠ E 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 3-Ford-Stevens
|
18 |
♠764
♥92
♦A82
♣T9543
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 4.50 0.50 5♠ E +1 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 3-Ford-Stevens
480 4.50 0.50 5♠ E +1 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
510 2.00 3.00 5♠ E +2 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Tainty-Haley
510 2.00 3.00 4♠ E +3 2-Cole-Litvak vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
510 2.00 3.00 4♠ E +3 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 11-Suddards-Henderson
980 0.00 5.00 6♠ E 4-Harken-Jones vs 9-Simon-Simon
|
19 |
♠T2
♥T
♦JT842
♣87543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.50 0.50 4♠ E +1 2-Cole-Litvak vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
650 4.50 0.50 4♠ E +1 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
660 3.00 2.00 3N E +2 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Harken-Jones
680 1.00 4.00 5♠ E +1 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 9-Simon-Simon
680 1.00 4.00 4♠ E +2 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 3-Ford-Stevens
680 1.00 4.00 4♠ E +2 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 7-Tainty-Haley
|
20 |
♠JT
♥K752
♦J76
♣T962
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 5.00 0.00 3N E -3 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 9-Simon-Simon
100 4.00 1.00 3N E -1 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 7-Tainty-Haley
120 3.00 2.00 2N E 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 3-Ford-Stevens
150 2.00 3.00 1N E +2 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
600 1.00 4.00 3N W 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Harken-Jones
630 0.00 5.00 3N W +1 2-Cole-Litvak vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
|
21 |
♠AJ95
♥J6
♦AK7
♣QT83
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 5.00 0.00 3♦ S +1 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
90 4.00 1.00 1N N 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Harken-Jones
100 2.50 2.50 2N N -1 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 9-Simon-Simon
100 2.50 2.50 2N N -1 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 7-Tainty-Haley
200 0.50 4.50 3N N -2 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 3-Ford-Stevens
200 0.50 4.50 2N N -2 2-Cole-Litvak vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
|
22 |
♠QT8
♥K98
♦QT
♣KT762
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ -/1♦ 3/4♠ 1NT ♦6/7 ♥3 |
EW: 3/4♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
170 4.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
100 3.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 7-Tainty-Haley vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 3-Ford-Stevens vs 9-Simon-Simon
620 0.50 4.50 4♥ W 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Cole-Litvak
620 0.50 4.50 4♥ W 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 4-Harken-Jones
|
23 |
♠QJ2
♥AK72
♦AJ3
♣Q86
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 5.00 0.00 4♥ N 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
170 4.00 1.00 2♥ N +2 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Cole-Litvak
100 2.00 3.00 3N N -1 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 4-Harken-Jones
100 2.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 3-Ford-Stevens vs 9-Simon-Simon
100 2.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
200 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -2 7-Tainty-Haley vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
|
24 |
♠A862
♥964
♦AJ
♣J643
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 3N E -1 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 8-McIntosh-Harken
90 3.50 1.50 1N E 3-Ford-Stevens vs 9-Simon-Simon
90 3.50 1.50 1N E 10-Pulliam-Bull vs 4-Harken-Jones
110 1.00 4.00 3♦ E 6-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Cole-Litvak
110 1.00 4.00 2♦ E +1 7-Tainty-Haley vs 5-Cohen-Turnquist
110 1.00 4.00 2♦ E +1 11-Suddards-Henderson vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
|
25 |
♠2
♥KJ76532
♦K92
♣97
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦4/2 ♠3 |
EW: 2♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 9-Simon-Simon
100 4.00 1.00 5♥ N -2 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
170 3.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 4-Harken-Jones vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
200 2.00 3.00 3♠ E +2 2-Cole-Litvak vs 11-Suddards-Henderson
620 0.50 4.50 4♠ W 7-Tainty-Haley vs 3-Ford-Stevens
620 0.50 4.50 4♠ E 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
|
26 |
♠KQT6
♥T6
♦A4
♣AJT94
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.00 0.00 1♠ N +3 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
140 4.00 1.00 1♠ N +2 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 9-Simon-Simon
120 2.50 2.50 2N N 7-Tainty-Haley vs 3-Ford-Stevens
120 2.50 2.50 1N S +1 4-Harken-Jones vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
100 1.00 4.00 1N E -1 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
90 0.00 5.00 1N E 2-Cole-Litvak vs 11-Suddards-Henderson
|
27 |
♠QJT
♥J43
♦T
♣AKQT85
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦0 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 6♦ 3♠ 1/4NT ♣4/5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 1.00 3♦ W +2 2-Cole-Litvak vs 11-Suddards-Henderson
150 4.00 1.00 3♦ W +2 8-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Goodell-Goodell
150 4.00 1.00 3♦ W +2 12-Oppenheimer-Wagener vs 9-Simon-Simon
400 2.00 3.00 5♦ W 4-Harken-Jones vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
420 0.50 4.50 5♦ W +1 5-Cohen-Turnquist vs 10-Pulliam-Bull
420 0.50 4.50 5♦ W +1 7-Tainty-Haley vs 3-Ford-Stevens
|