1 |
♠QJ63
♥KQJT5
♦-
♣KJ94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♥ 6♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥1 ♠0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 7-Cole-Litvak vs 3-Haley-Tainty
480 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
480 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
|
2 |
♠-
♥J8754
♦J974
♣8652
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6/5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.83 0.17 4♠ E 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
450 0.83 2.17 4♠ E +1 7-Cole-Litvak vs 3-Haley-Tainty
450 0.83 2.17 4♠ E +1 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
|
3 |
♠J6
♥J98
♦KT7
♣AT632
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠6/5 |
EW: 1/-♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠7/6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
210 2.83 0.17 2N S +3 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
120 1.50 1.50 2N S 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
140 0.17 2.83 3♠ E 7-Cole-Litvak vs 3-Haley-Tainty
|
4 |
♠K64
♥KQ64
♦76
♣AKQ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 4/2♦ 4♥ 1/-♠ 3NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.83 0.17 3N N -1 1-Wald-Hamlin vs 3-Haley-Tainty
200 1.50 1.50 4♥* N -1 7-Cole-Litvak vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
660 0.17 2.83 3N E +2 8-Smith-Gottlieb vs 4-Burtch-Benich
|
5 |
♠AK93
♥5
♦Q952
♣KJT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4/5♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.17 0.83 4♥ E +1 1-Wald-Hamlin vs 3-Haley-Tainty
450 2.17 0.83 4♥ E +1 8-Smith-Gottlieb vs 4-Burtch-Benich
480 0.17 2.83 4♥ E +2 7-Cole-Litvak vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
|
6 |
♠Q4
♥QJ53
♦986
♣QJ76
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥3 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 4♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 2.17 0.83 3N W +1 1-Wald-Hamlin vs 3-Haley-Tainty
630 2.17 0.83 3N E +1 7-Cole-Litvak vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
660 0.17 2.83 3N W +2 8-Smith-Gottlieb vs 4-Burtch-Benich
|
7 |
♠J976
♥85
♦9862
♣K63
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣5/4 ♥5/4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.83 0.17 3♠ S +1 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Haley-Tainty
140 0.83 2.17 2♠ S +1 9-Black-Cramblet vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
140 0.83 2.17 2♠ S +1 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 1-Wald-Hamlin
|
8 |
♠QJ64
♥KQ5
♦J5
♣AQ85
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦4/3 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1/2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.83 0.17 3N N 9-Black-Cramblet vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Haley-Tainty
150 0.17 2.83 4♥ N -3 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 1-Wald-Hamlin
|
9 |
♠K54
♥JT
♦J865
♣J642
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/3♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 1/-NT ♣4 ♦4 ♠5/6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.17 0.83 3♥ W +1 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 1-Wald-Hamlin
170 2.17 0.83 3♥ E +1 9-Black-Cramblet vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
620 0.17 2.83 4♥ W 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Haley-Tainty
|
10 |
♠Q732
♥JT
♦KQJ5
♣JT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.83 0.17 2N W -1 1-Wald-Hamlin vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
150 1.50 1.50 2N W +1 7-Cole-Litvak vs 4-Burtch-Benich
500 0.17 2.83 1N* S -2 9-Black-Cramblet vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
|
11 |
♠A84
♥QT83
♦Q762
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.83 0.17 4♦ E +1 7-Cole-Litvak vs 4-Burtch-Benich
400 1.50 1.50 3N W 9-Black-Cramblet vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
430 0.17 2.83 3N E +1 1-Wald-Hamlin vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
|
12 |
♠QJ32
♥Q53
♦KQJ64
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3/4♠ ♣5 ♥3/4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.83 0.17 3♦ N -1 9-Black-Cramblet vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ W 1-Wald-Hamlin vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
450 0.17 2.83 4♥ W +1 7-Cole-Litvak vs 4-Burtch-Benich
|
13 |
♠A8
♥KT9854
♦AT86
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 3N W -3 1-Wald-Hamlin vs 9-Black-Cramblet
170 2.00 1.00 2♥ N +2 8-Smith-Gottlieb vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 4-Burtch-Benich vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
100 0.00 3.00 3♦ W -1 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 3-Haley-Tainty
|
14 |
♠AQJ5
♥AJ73
♦QJT
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ S -1 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 3-Haley-Tainty
100 2.00 1.00 1N N -2 1-Wald-Hamlin vs 9-Black-Cramblet
110 0.50 2.50 3♣ W 4-Burtch-Benich vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
110 0.50 2.50 3♣ W 8-Smith-Gottlieb vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
|
15 |
♠Q
♥J63
♦AK9643
♣962
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 2♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.83 0.17 4♠ E 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 3-Haley-Tainty
450 0.83 2.17 4♠ E +1 4-Burtch-Benich vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
450 0.83 2.17 4♠ E +1 8-Smith-Gottlieb vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
|
16 |
♠KJ7
♥KT75
♦65
♣KQ97
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 9-Black-Cramblet vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 3-Haley-Tainty vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 5-Mazzei-Fidelman vs 7-Cole-Litvak
100 0.00 3.00 4♠* S -1 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 4-Burtch-Benich
|
17 |
♠KT865
♥AT8
♦-
♣AJT75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6/5♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠1 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 0.50 5♠ N 3-Haley-Tainty vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 9-Black-Cramblet vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
300 1.00 2.00 5♦* E -2 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 4-Burtch-Benich
100 0.00 3.00 5♦ E -2 5-Mazzei-Fidelman vs 7-Cole-Litvak
|
18 |
♠K9
♥K74
♦T54
♣T9854
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 9-Black-Cramblet vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 4-Burtch-Benich
50 1.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 5-Mazzei-Fidelman vs 7-Cole-Litvak
110 0.00 3.00 3♦ E 3-Haley-Tainty vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
|
19 |
♠AKT8
♥J86
♦T873
♣T7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 1/2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 2♠ E -4 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
300 2.00 1.00 3♥ W -3 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
130 1.00 2.00 2♦ S +2 4-Burtch-Benich vs 9-Black-Cramblet
150 0.00 3.00 3N S -3 1-Wald-Hamlin vs 7-Cole-Litvak
|
20 |
♠JT94
♥AKJ72
♦AK2
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 6♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1430 2.50 0.50 6♠ S 4-Burtch-Benich vs 9-Black-Cramblet
1430 2.50 0.50 6♠ S 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
680 1.00 2.00 5♠ S +1 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
230 0.00 3.00 3♠ S +3 1-Wald-Hamlin vs 7-Cole-Litvak
|
21 |
♠KQJT3
♥A3
♦K7
♣K643
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/1♥ 4♠ 4/3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 4-Burtch-Benich vs 9-Black-Cramblet
620 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Smith-Gottlieb
620 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 5-Mazzei-Fidelman
170 0.00 3.00 3♠ N +1 1-Wald-Hamlin vs 7-Cole-Litvak
|
22 |
♠KJT542
♥QT
♦J9
♣KJ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 6♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 4-Burtch-Benich vs 3-Haley-Tainty
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ N -2 5-Mazzei-Fidelman vs 1-Wald-Hamlin
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ E 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 7-Cole-Litvak vs 9-Black-Cramblet
|
23 |
♠JT53
♥Q92
♦J6
♣A754
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 1.00 2N W -1 7-Cole-Litvak vs 9-Black-Cramblet
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 4-Burtch-Benich vs 3-Haley-Tainty
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 5-Mazzei-Fidelman vs 1-Wald-Hamlin
150 0.00 3.00 2N W +1 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
|
24 |
♠AJ
♥J3
♦AQT965
♣K73
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.50 0.50 4♦ N 4-Burtch-Benich vs 3-Haley-Tainty
130 2.50 0.50 2♦ N +2 7-Cole-Litvak vs 9-Black-Cramblet
50 1.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 6-Palmer-Palmer
150 0.00 3.00 2♦ N -3 5-Mazzei-Fidelman vs 1-Wald-Hamlin
|
25 |
♠64
♥KJ98
♦J76
♣JT72
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3♠ W +2 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 7-Cole-Litvak
620 2.00 1.00 4♠ W 8-Smith-Gottlieb vs 1-Wald-Hamlin
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 5-Mazzei-Fidelman vs 4-Burtch-Benich
710 0.00 3.00 4♠ W +3 3-Haley-Tainty vs 9-Black-Cramblet
|
26 |
♠QT5
♥65
♦A643
♣KJ63
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ S 8-Smith-Gottlieb vs 1-Wald-Hamlin
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 3-Haley-Tainty vs 9-Black-Cramblet
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 5-Mazzei-Fidelman vs 4-Burtch-Benich
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 7-Cole-Litvak
|
27 |
♠KQ76
♥JT3
♦A87
♣T53
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
PASS 3.00 0.00 Pass Out 8-Smith-Gottlieb vs 1-Wald-Hamlin
50 1.00 2.00 2N S -1 5-Mazzei-Fidelman vs 4-Burtch-Benich
50 1.00 2.00 2N S -1 10-Suddards-Henderson vs 7-Cole-Litvak
50 1.00 2.00 1♥ S -1 3-Haley-Tainty vs 9-Black-Cramblet
|