1 |
♠JT82
♥Q83
♦AQ85
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3/5 ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ -/1♠ 1NT ♥5/6 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 3♣ W -2 6-Gamble-Faircrest vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
50 2.63 1.38 3♣ W -1 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
80 1.38 2.63 1♠ W 7-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Slinger-Ray
110 0.13 3.88 2♣ W +1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 2-Stone-Harken
|
2 |
♠KQ752
♥A6
♦J7
♣7432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.88 0.13 2♠ N +2 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 2-Stone-Harken
50 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
50 2.00 2.00 3♦ W -1 6-Gamble-Faircrest vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
100 0.13 3.88 2♦ N -1 7-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Slinger-Ray
|
3 |
♠KT7654
♥A86
♦AJ96
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.88 0.13 2♠ N +3 6-Gamble-Faircrest vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
170 2.63 1.38 2♠ N +2 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 2-Stone-Harken
130 1.38 2.63 3♦ N +1 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ N 7-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Slinger-Ray
|
4 |
♠KQJ98
♥64
♦K75
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 2♥ E -1 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 2-Stone-Harken
100 2.63 1.38 3♠ N -1 7-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
110 1.38 2.63 2♥ E 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Slinger-Ray
300 0.13 3.88 3N N -3 8-Martin-Shepherd vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
|
5 |
♠J4
♥A6432
♦T85
♣T42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.88 0.13 6N* E -2 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Slinger-Ray
100 2.63 1.38 6♦ E -2 7-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
170 1.38 2.63 1♥ E +3 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 2-Stone-Harken
630 0.13 3.88 3♥* E +1 8-Martin-Shepherd vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
|
6 |
♠K3
♥KT53
♦AQ5
♣KQT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 6♠ 5NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 3.88 0.13 6♠ S 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Slinger-Ray
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +2 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 2-Stone-Harken
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +2 8-Martin-Shepherd vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
460 0.13 3.88 3N N +2 7-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
|
7 |
♠93
♥J864
♦Q54
♣AJ94
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.88 0.13 3N W -3 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
200 2.63 1.38 3N W -2 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
90 0.75 3.25 1N W 2-Stone-Harken vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
90 0.75 3.25 1N W 6-Gamble-Faircrest vs 3-Slinger-Ray
|
8 |
♠A73
♥Q8
♦A9875
♣Q83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 3.88 0.13 3N N +2 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
50 2.00 2.00 6N N -1 2-Stone-Harken vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
50 2.00 2.00 6N N -1 6-Gamble-Faircrest vs 3-Slinger-Ray
100 0.13 3.88 6N N -2 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
|
9 |
♠T876
♥AQJ6
♦94
♣T92
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.88 0.13 2♠ E -3 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
150 2.63 1.38 1N S +2 2-Stone-Harken vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
120 0.75 3.25 1N S +1 6-Gamble-Faircrest vs 3-Slinger-Ray
120 0.75 3.25 1N S +1 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
|
10 |
♠K
♥QJT85
♦Q2
♣98654
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.88 0.13 1N E +1 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 7-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
180 0.13 3.88 1N E +3 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 2-Stone-Harken
|
11 |
♠A
♥K97543
♦A9865
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 5/6♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.88 0.13 4♦ N +1 7-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
170 2.63 1.38 3♠ W +1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
420 1.38 2.63 4♠ W 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
590 0.13 3.88 4♠* W 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 2-Stone-Harken
|
12 |
♠Q865
♥54
♦KT83
♣A75
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1/-♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.88 0.13 3N E -3 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 2-Stone-Harken
100 2.63 1.38 3N E -2 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
400 0.75 3.25 3N W 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
400 0.75 3.25 3N W 7-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
|
13 |
♠AQ6
♥J95
♦AKQT84
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.00 0.00 3N S 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 3-Slinger-Ray
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ N +1 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
110 2.50 1.50 1♦ N +2 4-Evenden-Pulliam vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ N 2-Stone-Harken vs 7-Benz-Suddards
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 8-Martin-Shepherd vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
|
14 |
♠AK
♥T4
♦KT8
♣QJT865
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.00 1.00 4♣ N 2-Stone-Harken vs 7-Benz-Suddards
130 3.00 1.00 4♣ N 4-Evenden-Pulliam vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
50 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 8-Martin-Shepherd vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
100 0.00 4.00 5♣* N -1 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 3-Slinger-Ray
|
15 |
♠AT63
♥6
♦AJ432
♣AKQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1/2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
750 4.00 0.00 3N* N 4-Evenden-Pulliam vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 2-Stone-Harken vs 7-Benz-Suddards
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 8-Martin-Shepherd vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 3-Slinger-Ray
|
16 |
♠AJ6
♥6
♦JT87654
♣J3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 5♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦4/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 6♥ W -1 2-Stone-Harken vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
100 3.50 0.50 5♥ W -1 3-Slinger-Ray vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
650 1.00 3.00 5♥ W 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 7-Benz-Suddards
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
|
17 |
♠KQJ
♥QT54
♦AKT98
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 3-Slinger-Ray vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
460 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 7-Benz-Suddards
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 2-Stone-Harken vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
|
18 |
♠A6
♥AQ952
♦KJ
♣KJ97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 4♥ 4/3♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 7-Benz-Suddards
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 3-Slinger-Ray vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ N 2-Stone-Harken vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ N 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ N 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
|
19 |
♠983
♥QT6
♦AT62
♣T96
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -3 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Benz-Suddards
200 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 6-Gamble-Faircrest vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
100 1.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 3-Slinger-Ray vs 2-Stone-Harken
100 1.50 2.50 3♣ E -1 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
100 0.00 4.00 3♦ S -2 4-Evenden-Pulliam vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
|
20 |
♠AQ97
♥KT5
♦KT
♣QJ92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ -/1♥ ♣3 ♥6/7 ♠3 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 1N W -2 4-Evenden-Pulliam vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
200 3.50 0.50 3♦ E -2 6-Gamble-Faircrest vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
150 1.50 2.50 1N N +2 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Benz-Suddards
150 1.50 2.50 1N N +2 3-Slinger-Ray vs 2-Stone-Harken
90 0.00 4.00 1N N 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
|
21 |
♠74
♥T752
♦K2
♣K8765
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 1.00 1N W -1 4-Evenden-Pulliam vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 3-Slinger-Ray vs 2-Stone-Harken
50 3.00 1.00 2♦ E -1 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Benz-Suddards
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ W 6-Gamble-Faircrest vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ W +1 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke
|
22 |
♠Q65
♥JT74
♦Q983
♣A8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣2 ♠5 |
EW: 5♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.50 0.50 4♦ S 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
130 3.50 0.50 3♦ S +1 4-Evenden-Pulliam vs 3-Slinger-Ray
50 2.00 2.00 5♦ S -1 7-Benz-Suddards vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
100 1.00 3.00 5♦ S -2 2-Stone-Harken vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
150 0.00 4.00 4♣ E +1 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
|
23 |
♠A9
♥JT842
♦J73
♣K65
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 4.00 0.00 1N N +3 7-Benz-Suddards vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
90 2.00 2.00 2♣ W 2-Stone-Harken vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -1 4-Evenden-Pulliam vs 3-Slinger-Ray
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -1 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
|
24 |
♠Q973
♥754
♦KT9
♣743
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 2-Stone-Harken vs 8-Martin-Shepherd
100 3.00 1.00 2N E -2 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 6-Gamble-Faircrest
90 2.00 2.00 1N E 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ E 4-Evenden-Pulliam vs 3-Slinger-Ray
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ E 7-Benz-Suddards vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
|
25 |
♠J
♥AQ32
♦AT8743
♣K7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT5/6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.25 0.75 3♠ E -2 3-Slinger-Ray vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
200 3.25 0.75 2♠ E -2 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 7-Benz-Suddards
100 1.38 2.63 2N W -1 8-Martin-Shepherd vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
70 0.13 3.88 1♦ N 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
|
26 |
♠K6
♥AJ963
♦832
♣943
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 3N E -1 8-Martin-Shepherd vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
120 2.63 1.38 2N W 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
180 1.38 2.63 2N E +2 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 7-Benz-Suddards
630 0.13 3.88 3N E +1 3-Slinger-Ray vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
|
27 |
♠QJ62
♥J753
♦J8432
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 1NT ♦7/6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.88 0.13 3N E -3 8-Martin-Shepherd vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
100 2.63 1.38 3♦ E -2 5-Laborde Bishop-Burke vs 4-Evenden-Pulliam
50 1.38 2.63 2♠ S -1 3-Slinger-Ray vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
90 0.13 3.88 1N E 10-Friedberg-Wasserstrom vs 7-Benz-Suddards
|