1 |
♠7643
♥A976
♦J
♣KT75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.50 0.50 3♠ E -2 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 2-Benich-Oing
100 4.50 0.50 5♦ W -2 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 11-Smith-Smith
50 2.50 2.50 3N W -1 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
50 2.50 2.50 5♦ W -1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 1-Schilling-Benich
170 1.00 4.00 3♠ E +1 9-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
430 0.00 5.00 3N E +1 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
|
2 |
♠AK982
♥K7
♦A654
♣J3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ 4/3♠ 4/2NT ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5/6 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 5.00 0.00 3N N 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 11-Smith-Smith
170 3.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 1-Schilling-Benich
170 3.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
170 3.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 9-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 1.00 4.00 3♠ N 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
100 0.00 5.00 4♠ N -1 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 2-Benich-Oing
|
3 |
♠AQJ
♥A543
♦QJ8
♣A97
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 5.00 0.00 3N N +2 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 2-Benich-Oing
450 3.50 1.50 5♥ N 9-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
450 3.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
50 1.00 4.00 6N N -1 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 11-Smith-Smith
50 1.00 4.00 6♥ N -1 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
50 1.00 4.00 6♥ N -1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 1-Schilling-Benich
|
4 |
♠Q42
♥765
♦J94
♣AKT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
600 2.00 3.00 3N W 1-Schilling-Benich vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
600 2.00 3.00 3N W 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
600 2.00 3.00 3N W 9-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
600 2.00 3.00 3N W 11-Smith-Smith vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
600 2.00 3.00 3N W 12-Jones-Murdock vs 2-Benich-Oing
|
5 |
♠AT874
♥63
♦JT
♣KT84
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.50 0.50 1N W +2 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
150 4.50 0.50 3♦ W +2 11-Smith-Smith vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
400 3.00 2.00 3N W 9-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
430 1.50 3.50 3N W +1 1-Schilling-Benich vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
430 1.50 3.50 3N W +1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 2-Benich-Oing
460 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
6 |
♠AJ2
♥Q54
♦82
♣KJ643
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 1NT ♣3 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 11-Smith-Smith vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ W 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ W 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ W 9-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
300 1.00 4.00 5♣* N -2 1-Schilling-Benich vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
600 0.00 5.00 5♦ W 12-Jones-Murdock vs 2-Benich-Oing
|
7 |
♠98
♥Q97
♦QT542
♣Q53
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/1♦ 2♠ 2/1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 5.00 0.00 3N N +1 11-Smith-Smith vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
200 4.00 1.00 3♠ S +2 12-Jones-Murdock vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 1.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 1-Schilling-Benich vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
100 1.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 2-Benich-Oing vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
100 1.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
100 1.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
|
8 |
♠5
♥AT743
♦QT63
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ 4/3♠ 3NT ♣6/5 ♦5 |
EW: 1/2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ S +1 1-Schilling-Benich vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ S +1 2-Benich-Oing vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
150 3.00 2.00 4♦ E -3 12-Jones-Murdock vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
140 1.50 3.50 3♠ S 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
140 1.50 3.50 3♠ S 11-Smith-Smith vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
50 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
|
9 |
♠KQT9873
♥A3
♦K9
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 5.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 11-Smith-Smith vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ N 1-Schilling-Benich vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ N 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
50 2.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 2-Benich-Oing vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
150 0.50 4.50 3N S -3 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
150 0.50 4.50 3N S -3 12-Jones-Murdock vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
10 |
♠K
♥Q92
♦J653
♣JT862
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 12-Jones-Murdock vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
150 4.00 1.00 1N N +2 2-Benich-Oing vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
110 3.00 2.00 3♣ S 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
100 2.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 11-Smith-Smith vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
110 0.50 4.50 2♠ W 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Schilling-Benich
110 0.50 4.50 2♠ W 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
|
11 |
♠Q5
♥QJT62
♦T973
♣T9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 5.00 0.00 3♥* W -3 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
400 4.00 1.00 5♦ S 11-Smith-Smith vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
300 3.00 2.00 2♥* W -2 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Schilling-Benich
100 1.00 4.00 3♥ W -2 2-Benich-Oing vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 1.00 4.00 3♥ W -2 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
100 1.00 4.00 3♥ W -2 12-Jones-Murdock vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
|
12 |
♠5
♥AKQ52
♦AJT87
♣93
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 5♠ E -1 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Schilling-Benich
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ E 2-Benich-Oing vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ E 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 11-Smith-Smith vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
480 1.00 4.00 5♠ W +1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
590 0.00 5.00 4♠* E 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
|
13 |
♠832
♥K82
♦43
♣A9863
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 5.00 0.00 4♠ W +1 9-Llacera-Llacera vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
660 4.00 1.00 3N E +2 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 11-Smith-Smith
680 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 1-Schilling-Benich vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
680 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
680 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 4-Maggipinto-Smyth vs 2-Benich-Oing
680 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 12-Jones-Murdock vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
|
14 |
♠K9764
♥T965
♦5
♣AKQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6/5 ♥5 ♠4/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.50 0.50 2♠ N 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
110 4.50 0.50 2♥ S 4-Maggipinto-Smyth vs 2-Benich-Oing
100 2.50 2.50 3N W -2 1-Schilling-Benich vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
100 2.50 2.50 1N W -2 12-Jones-Murdock vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
90 1.00 4.00 1N W 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 11-Smith-Smith
100 0.00 5.00 2♠ N -2 9-Llacera-Llacera vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
|
15 |
♠AQT64
♥T
♦982
♣AQ94
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 5.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 4-Maggipinto-Smyth vs 2-Benich-Oing
200 4.00 1.00 2♥ S +3 9-Llacera-Llacera vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
170 3.00 2.00 2♥ S +2 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
130 2.00 3.00 4♣ N 1-Schilling-Benich vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
200 0.50 4.50 3N S -2 12-Jones-Murdock vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
200 0.50 4.50 2N N -2 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 11-Smith-Smith
|
16 |
♠K986
♥82
♦Q8
♣K5432
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 ♥0 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 7♥ 7NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
260 5.00 0.00 3♥ W +4 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 11-Smith-Smith
650 4.00 1.00 5♥ W 2-Benich-Oing vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
680 3.00 2.00 5♥ W +1 4-Maggipinto-Smyth vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
1430 2.00 3.00 6♠ W 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
1460 0.50 4.50 6♥ W +1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
1460 0.50 4.50 6♥ E +1 1-Schilling-Benich vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
17 |
♠AK762
♥AT82
♦A
♣K53
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 4.50 0.50 6♠ N 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
980 4.50 0.50 6♠ N 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 11-Smith-Smith
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 1-Schilling-Benich vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
50 0.50 4.50 6♠ N -1 2-Benich-Oing vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
50 0.50 4.50 6♠ N -1 4-Maggipinto-Smyth vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
|
18 |
♠63
♥KJ863
♦Q63
♣653
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♠ ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.70 1.30 1N W -2 1-Schilling-Benich vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 3.70 1.30 1N W -2 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 3.70 1.30 1N W -2 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 11-Smith-Smith
50 1.30 3.70 1N W -1 2-Benich-Oing vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
130 0.10 4.90 2♣ E +2 12-Jones-Murdock vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
|
19 |
♠A765
♥Q754
♦986
♣Q3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 2♦ N -2 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 1-Schilling-Benich
120 4.00 1.00 1N E +1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
150 1.50 3.50 1N W +2 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
150 1.50 3.50 1N E +2 2-Benich-Oing vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
150 1.50 3.50 1N E +2 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
150 1.50 3.50 1N E +2 11-Smith-Smith vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
|
20 |
♠K642
♥Q
♦T
♣QJ97654
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 5♦ 5/3♥ 5/3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 5.00 0.00 4♠* S -2 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 1-Schilling-Benich
600 4.00 1.00 3N E 2-Benich-Oing vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
630 3.00 2.00 3N E +1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
650 2.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 11-Smith-Smith vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
690 0.50 4.50 3N W +3 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
690 0.50 4.50 3N E +3 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
21 |
♠QJ87
♥743
♦AKQT4
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.50 0.50 4♠* W -3 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
500 4.50 0.50 4♠* E -3 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
200 3.00 2.00 5♠ E -4 12-Jones-Murdock vs 7-Rodgers-Feldstein
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ S +1 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 1-Schilling-Benich
100 1.00 4.00 5♣ E -2 2-Benich-Oing vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
50 0.00 5.00 3♠ W -1 11-Smith-Smith vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
|
22 |
♠43
♥83
♦KJ764
♣8654
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
100 4.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
100 4.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 11-Smith-Smith vs 1-Schilling-Benich
100 1.50 3.50 3♥ S -2 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 2-Benich-Oing
100 1.50 3.50 3♥ S -2 12-Jones-Murdock vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
140 0.00 5.00 2♠ E +1 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
|
23 |
♠92
♥K642
♦J42
♣K762
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.50 0.50 3♣ S +1 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 2-Benich-Oing
130 4.50 0.50 2♣ S +2 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
90 3.00 2.00 2♣ S 11-Smith-Smith vs 1-Schilling-Benich
100 2.00 3.00 3♣ S -1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
200 0.00 5.00 3♣ S -2 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
|
24 |
♠QJT4
♥AJ74
♦A74
♣T7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.50 0.50 5♠ S 11-Smith-Smith vs 1-Schilling-Benich
450 4.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 6-Wainer-Wainer vs 2-Benich-Oing
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 10-Pulliam-Edmondson vs 4-Maggipinto-Smyth
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 12-Jones-Murdock vs 8-Gamble-Jennings
100 0.50 4.50 3N N -2 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
100 0.50 4.50 6♠ S -2 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
|
25 |
♠KQ64
♥A8
♦K765
♣764
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥1 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
530 5.00 0.00 3♠* S 2-Benich-Oing vs 11-Smith-Smith
50 3.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 3.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
100 2.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 4-Maggipinto-Smyth vs 1-Schilling-Benich
200 1.00 4.00 3♥ E +2 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
650 0.00 5.00 4♥ E +1 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
|
26 |
♠Q942
♥KQ9
♦KJT94
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4/3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -1 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
100 4.50 0.50 3♣ E -1 2-Benich-Oing vs 11-Smith-Smith
130 3.00 2.00 2♣ E +2 4-Maggipinto-Smyth vs 1-Schilling-Benich
180 1.00 4.00 2N E +2 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
180 1.00 4.00 2N E +2 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
180 1.00 4.00 1N E +3 12-Jones-Murdock vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
|
27 |
♠AK93
♥JT2
♦85
♣AK93
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: -/1♦ -/1♠ ♣5 ♦6/7 ♥6 ♠6/7 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 7-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 4.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 8-Gamble-Jennings vs 6-Wainer-Wainer
50 4.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 12-Jones-Murdock vs 9-Llacera-Llacera
50 1.50 3.50 1N N -1 2-Benich-Oing vs 11-Smith-Smith
50 1.50 3.50 2♦ N -1 4-Maggipinto-Smyth vs 1-Schilling-Benich
100 0.00 5.00 1N N -2 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 10-Pulliam-Edmondson
|