1 |
♠AK8
♥Q5
♦A87
♣KJ986
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2N N +1 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 2-Jones-Harken
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 1-Haley-Tainty
50 0.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Benich-Henderson
|
2 |
♠KT6
♥QJ864
♦JT
♣AJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦0 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 5♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣3 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ N 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Benich-Henderson
100 1.00 1.00 3N E -2 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 2-Jones-Harken
190 0.00 2.00 4♦ E +3 8-Keen-Stevens vs 1-Haley-Tainty
|
3 |
♠K
♥J952
♦KJ943
♣AT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 1♠ S +1 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 2-Jones-Harken
100 1.00 1.00 1N W -1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 1-Haley-Tainty
50 0.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Benich-Henderson
|
4 |
♠AQJ
♥QJ94
♦AJT5
♣K5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 2.00 0.00 2N* N 8-Keen-Stevens vs 1-Haley-Tainty
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ E 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Benich-Henderson
200 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -2 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 2-Jones-Harken
|
5 |
♠A65
♥K53
♦32
♣AK543
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 5♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 1-Haley-Tainty vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
600 0.50 1.50 3N N 5-Cole-Spencer vs 3-Benich-Henderson
600 0.50 1.50 3N N 8-Keen-Stevens vs 2-Jones-Harken
|
6 |
♠84
♥Q9832
♦Q9632
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 1-Haley-Tainty vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
180 1.00 1.00 2N S +2 5-Cole-Spencer vs 3-Benich-Henderson
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 8-Keen-Stevens vs 2-Jones-Harken
|
7 |
♠K6
♥-
♦AKQJT8532
♣K5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 4NT ♣5 ♠4 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2♠ ♦2/3 ♥5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 1.50 0.50 5♦ S 1-Haley-Tainty vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
600 1.50 0.50 5♦ N 5-Cole-Spencer vs 3-Benich-Henderson
130 0.00 2.00 3♦ N +1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 2-Jones-Harken
|
8 |
♠9
♥K984
♦J863
♣KQ83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 1.50 0.50 2N E 1-Haley-Tainty vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
120 1.50 0.50 1N W +1 5-Cole-Spencer vs 3-Benich-Henderson
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E 8-Keen-Stevens vs 2-Jones-Harken
|
9 |
♠-
♥A854
♦AQ976
♣A976
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 2♦ 5/4♥ ♣7/6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3/4♠ 1NT ♣4/6 ♦5 ♥2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 1-Haley-Tainty vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 3-Benich-Henderson
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 2-Jones-Harken vs 5-Cole-Spencer
|
10 |
♠765
♥K86
♦QT95
♣K73
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 6♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ W 8-Keen-Stevens vs 3-Benich-Henderson
630 0.50 1.50 3N W +1 2-Jones-Harken vs 5-Cole-Spencer
630 0.50 1.50 3N E +1 1-Haley-Tainty vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
|
11 |
♠KQ62
♥T643
♦JT6
♣Q3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2/1♥ 1/-NT ♣4 ♠6 NT7/5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 1.50 0.50 2♥ N 2-Jones-Harken vs 5-Cole-Spencer
110 1.50 0.50 2♥ N 8-Keen-Stevens vs 3-Benich-Henderson
50 0.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 1-Haley-Tainty vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
|
12 |
♠KQJ2
♥AQ95
♦J9
♣T92
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6/5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 1N E -2 8-Keen-Stevens vs 3-Benich-Henderson
90 1.00 1.00 1N S 1-Haley-Tainty vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
100 0.00 2.00 2N N -1 2-Jones-Harken vs 5-Cole-Spencer
|
13 |
♠Q7
♥AQ92
♦JT
♣KJ983
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.50 0.50 3♥ S +1 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Cole-Spencer
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ S +2 8-Keen-Stevens vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 2-Jones-Harken vs 1-Haley-Tainty
|
14 |
♠QJ73
♥Q873
♦K3
♣KT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2♦ E +3 2-Jones-Harken vs 1-Haley-Tainty
400 1.00 1.00 3N E 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Cole-Spencer
430 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
|
15 |
♠T652
♥AT93
♦T74
♣T8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/3♦ 2/3♥ 3/4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5/4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.00 0.00 2N S 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Cole-Spencer
110 1.00 1.00 1♣ S +2 2-Jones-Harken vs 1-Haley-Tainty
100 0.00 2.00 2N S -1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
|
16 |
♠JT6
♥J52
♦832
♣QJ96
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 8-Keen-Stevens vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Cole-Spencer
170 0.50 1.50 2♦ W +4 2-Jones-Harken vs 1-Haley-Tainty
|
17 |
♠QT
♥84
♦KQ92
♣AK932
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠3/4 NT3/6 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ W +1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 5-Cole-Spencer
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ W +1 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
200 0.00 2.00 4♣ N -4 3-Benich-Henderson vs 2-Jones-Harken
|
18 |
♠9
♥J
♦9754
♣AKT9852
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2NT ♣4/3 ♦4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 3-Benich-Henderson vs 2-Jones-Harken
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ S -2 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
500 0.00 2.00 5♣* N -2 8-Keen-Stevens vs 5-Cole-Spencer
|
19 |
♠T632
♥A53
♦J832
♣94
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2/3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
620 1.00 1.00 5♣ W +1 3-Benich-Henderson vs 2-Jones-Harken
630 0.00 2.00 3N W +1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 5-Cole-Spencer
|
20 |
♠6
♥KQJ6
♦K632
♣KT94
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠1/2 NT1/2 |
EW: 1/2♣ -/1♦ -/1♥ 5♠ 5NT ♦6/7 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ W +1 3-Benich-Henderson vs 2-Jones-Harken
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ W +1 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
650 0.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 5-Cole-Spencer
|
21 |
♠8643
♥A42
♦J95
♣832
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ ♣5/4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 5-Cole-Spencer vs 1-Haley-Tainty
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ W 2-Jones-Harken vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +2 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 3-Benich-Henderson
|
22 |
♠T92
♥8
♦A87642
♣Q85
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 1N N -1 2-Jones-Harken vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
90 1.00 1.00 1N W 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 3-Benich-Henderson
150 0.00 2.00 1N E +2 5-Cole-Spencer vs 1-Haley-Tainty
|
23 |
♠AKT852
♥97
♦Q43
♣Q9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1/-NT ♦6 ♠5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 5-Cole-Spencer vs 1-Haley-Tainty
100 1.50 0.50 3♣ E -1 2-Jones-Harken vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 3-Benich-Henderson
|
24 |
♠65432
♥AQ2
♦A
♣A932
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 6♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
510 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +3 2-Jones-Harken vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 5-Cole-Spencer vs 1-Haley-Tainty
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ N +2 4-Ford-Turnquist vs 3-Benich-Henderson
|
25 |
♠Q7532
♥T
♦J87
♣J983
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 3N E -1 5-Cole-Spencer vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
100 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ E 3-Benich-Henderson vs 1-Haley-Tainty
|
26 |
♠A842
♥865
♦K2
♣AKT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 1.50 0.50 3N N +2 3-Benich-Henderson vs 1-Haley-Tainty
660 1.50 0.50 3N N +2 5-Cole-Spencer vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
|
27 |
♠QJ86
♥A9632
♦Q6
♣K4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ S 3-Benich-Henderson vs 1-Haley-Tainty
130 0.50 1.50 3♦ W +1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
130 0.50 1.50 2♦ W +2 5-Cole-Spencer vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
|
28 |
♠K63
♥AJ65
♦AKQT
♣K2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.00 0.00 3N N 3-Benich-Henderson vs 1-Haley-Tainty
150 0.50 1.50 2N N +1 5-Cole-Spencer vs 4-Ford-Turnquist
150 0.50 1.50 2N N +1 8-Keen-Stevens vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
|