1 |
♠JT73
♥KJT72
♦K86
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.90 0.10 4♥ W -2 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
50 3.70 1.30 2♥ E -1 4-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Stone-Ford
90 2.50 2.50 1N W 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
100 1.30 3.70 3♦ N -2 6-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
140 0.10 4.90 2♥ E +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Martin-Litvak
|
2 |
♠AT3
♥QT843
♦-
♣AJ982
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 4.90 0.10 2♦ S 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Martin-Litvak
100 3.10 1.90 3♥ N -1 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
100 3.10 1.90 2♦ S -1 4-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Stone-Ford
110 1.30 3.70 2♠ W 6-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
500 0.10 4.90 3N N -5 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
|
3 |
♠JT2
♥J92
♦AQJ96
♣QJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦0 ♥4 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 4.90 0.10 4♠ S +2 4-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Stone-Ford
450 3.10 1.90 4♠ S +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Martin-Litvak
450 3.10 1.90 4♠ S +1 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
100 1.30 3.70 6♠ S -2 6-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
250 0.10 4.90 5♣ S -5 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
|
4 |
♠Q82
♥842
♦8652
♣K54
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.75 0.25 3♦ S -1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Martin-Litvak
AVE- AVE+ 2.00 3.00 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
140 1.75 3.25 3♠ W 4-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Stone-Ford
140 1.75 3.25 2♠ W +1 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
140 1.75 3.25 2♠ W +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
|
5 |
♠J975
♥KT9
♦643
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.90 0.10 3N W -1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 2-Cooper-Keay
150 3.70 1.30 2♦ E +3 5-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
460 1.30 3.70 3N E +2 6-Benz-Suddards vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
460 1.30 3.70 3N E +2 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 4-Hill-Keen
460 1.30 3.70 3N E +2 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 6-Stone-Ford
|
6 |
♠KQT832
♥A2
♦QJ98
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣6/5 ♥6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4/3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.30 0.70 4♠ N +1 5-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
450 4.30 0.70 4♠ N +1 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 6-Stone-Ford
420 1.30 3.70 4♠ N 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 2-Cooper-Keay
420 1.30 3.70 4♠ N 6-Benz-Suddards vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
420 1.30 3.70 4♠ N 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 4-Hill-Keen
|
7 |
♠KQ42
♥54
♦-
♣AQJ9842
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.90 0.10 5♣ N 6-Benz-Suddards vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
100 3.10 1.90 5♣ N -1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 2-Cooper-Keay
100 3.10 1.90 5♣ N -1 5-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
200 1.30 3.70 5♣* N -1 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 6-Stone-Ford
650 0.10 4.90 4♥ E +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 4-Hill-Keen
|
8 |
♠A65
♥AT863
♦AT5
♣T2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.90 0.10 3♥ N 6-Benz-Suddards vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
50 3.10 1.90 3♠ W -1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 4-Hill-Keen
50 3.10 1.90 4♥ W -1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 2-Cooper-Keay
50 1.30 3.70 4♥ N -1 5-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
140 0.10 4.90 2♠ W +1 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 6-Stone-Ford
|
9 |
♠KJ42
♥T5
♦QJT43
♣72
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.90 0.10 2♠ N +2 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 5-Martin-Litvak
150 3.70 1.30 1N S +2 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
120 2.50 2.50 1N S +1 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
90 1.30 3.70 1N S 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Cooper-Keay
100 0.10 4.90 2N S -2 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
|
10 |
♠83
♥T9
♦KQ876
♣A753
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 5♣ 3♠ ♦2 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.90 0.10 3♠ W +1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
200 3.70 1.30 5♦ S -2 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 5-Martin-Litvak
650 1.30 3.70 4♠ W +1 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
650 1.30 3.70 4♠ W +1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
650 1.30 3.70 4♠ W +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Cooper-Keay
|
11 |
♠A76
♥T652
♦J854
♣K7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.90 0.10 3N W -1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
110 3.70 1.30 2♠ E 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
150 2.50 2.50 2N W +1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
180 1.30 3.70 2N W +2 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Cooper-Keay
430 0.10 4.90 3N E +1 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 5-Martin-Litvak
|
12 |
♠QJ842
♥53
♦KQ63
♣A8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2/1♠ 4NT ♣3 ♥3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ ♦2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.90 0.10 3N S +1 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
150 3.70 1.30 4♦ S +1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
130 2.50 2.50 4♦ S 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 5-Martin-Litvak
100 1.30 3.70 4♠ N -1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
200 0.10 4.90 5♦ S -2 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Cooper-Keay
|
13 |
♠5
♥KQT52
♦JT432
♣J3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1/-♠ ♣5 ♦5/4 ♥5/4 ♠7/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 4.90 0.10 2♠* W -3 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 2-Cooper-Keay
90 3.70 1.30 2♣ S 4-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Hill-Keen
80 2.50 2.50 1♠ S 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Stone-Ford
100 0.70 4.30 3N N -1 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
100 0.70 4.30 3♣ S -1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
|
14 |
♠Q743
♥A8
♦T8652
♣87
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.90 0.10 3N E -2 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Stone-Ford
50 3.70 1.30 3N W -1 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
PASS 2.50 2.50 Pass Out 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 2-Cooper-Keay
110 1.30 3.70 3♣ E 4-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Hill-Keen
140 0.10 4.90 3♠ E 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
|
15 |
♠AKQ3
♥-
♦93
♣AJ98754
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
950 4.90 0.10 5♣* N +1 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
800 3.70 1.30 4♥* E -4 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
620 1.90 3.10 5♣ N +1 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Stone-Ford
620 1.90 3.10 5♣ N +1 4-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Hill-Keen
170 0.10 4.90 3♣ N +3 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 2-Cooper-Keay
|
16 |
♠J2
♥6
♦AK43
♣AKJ652
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 3♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.90 0.10 3N N +2 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
430 3.70 1.30 3N S +1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 2-Cooper-Keay
400 1.30 3.70 5♣ N 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Stone-Ford
400 1.30 3.70 5♣ N 4-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Hill-Keen
400 1.30 3.70 5♣ N 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
|
17 |
♠K873
♥7542
♦J3
♣AJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ -/1NT ♣5 ♠4 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 1.00 1N W -1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
50 4.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 5-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Martin-Litvak
50 4.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 2-Cooper-Keay
90 2.00 3.00 1N W 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Hill-Keen
120 1.00 4.00 1N W +1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
140 0.00 5.00 2♥ W +1 4-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
|
18 |
♠KJT86
♥T9
♦732
♣843
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
50 4.00 1.00 2N E -1 5-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Martin-Litvak
90 3.00 2.00 1N E 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
110 2.00 3.00 2♣ E +1 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Hill-Keen
120 1.00 4.00 2N W 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 2-Cooper-Keay
400 0.00 5.00 3N W 4-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
|
19 |
♠T854
♥QJ87
♦QJ
♣986
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦0 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 7♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 3♣ E 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
170 4.00 1.00 3♦ W +3 5-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Martin-Litvak
600 3.00 2.00 5♦ W 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Hill-Keen
630 2.00 3.00 3N E +1 4-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
660 0.50 4.50 3N W +2 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
660 0.50 4.50 3N W +2 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 2-Cooper-Keay
|
20 |
♠AQT97
♥65
♦AT82
♣AK
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2/3♥ 1NT ♣3/4 ♦2 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Hill-Keen
200 4.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
200 4.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 4-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ N 5-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Martin-Litvak
100 1.00 4.00 3♠ N -1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
500 0.00 5.00 5♦ S -5 8-Reiss-Devlin vs 2-Cooper-Keay
|
21 |
♠QJ
♥A8
♦72
♣KQ97543
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 2.50 5♠ E 5-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Hill-Keen
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 5-Martin-Litvak
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 4-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Cooper-Keay
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Stone-Ford
|
22 |
♠T43
♥QJ62
♦98
♣A962
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.90 0.10 5♣ W -1 5-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Hill-Keen
50 3.70 1.30 3♠ S -1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Stone-Ford
100 2.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 5-Martin-Litvak
180 1.30 3.70 1N W +3 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
600 0.10 4.90 3N W 4-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Cooper-Keay
|
23 |
♠AQ
♥QJ6
♦JT6
♣QT732
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3/2♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 1/-NT ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT7/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.70 1.30 3♦ S 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
110 3.70 1.30 3♦ S 6-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Stone-Ford
110 3.70 1.30 2♦ S +1 4-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Cooper-Keay
170 0.70 4.30 3♠ E +1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 5-Martin-Litvak
170 0.70 4.30 2♠ E +2 5-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Hill-Keen
|
24 |
♠Q54
♥J8752
♦AJ52
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2/1 ♥2 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.90 0.10 4N W -2 1-McIntosh-Harken vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
400 3.70 1.30 3N E 4-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Cooper-Keay
430 2.50 2.50 3N W +1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 5-Martin-Litvak
460 0.70 4.30 3N E +2 5-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Hill-Keen
460 0.70 4.30 3N E +2 6-Benz-Suddards vs 6-Stone-Ford
|
25 |
♠-
♥KJ863
♦AKT932
♣Q7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5/6♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥1/2 ♠4/5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 5.00 0.00 4♥ N 4-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
400 4.00 1.00 3N S 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
50 2.00 3.00 6♥ N -1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 4-Hill-Keen
50 2.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 5-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
50 2.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Martin-Litvak
200 0.00 5.00 4♣ S -4 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 6-Stone-Ford
|
26 |
♠J763
♥KQ2
♦QJ2
♣KQT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 1N S +2 4-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 4-Hill-Keen
120 2.50 2.50 1N N +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Martin-Litvak
120 2.50 2.50 1N N +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
110 0.50 4.50 2♥ S 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 6-Stone-Ford
110 0.50 4.50 2♥ S 5-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
|
27 |
♠Q74
♥T9543
♦A75
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 5.00 0.00 1N S +3 5-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
140 4.00 1.00 3♥ N 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 6-Stone-Ford
110 3.00 2.00 2♥ S 6-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Martin-Litvak
50 1.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
50 1.50 3.50 3♥ S -1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 4-Hill-Keen
100 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -2 4-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
|
28 |
♠J4
♥AJ4
♦852
♣AKT43
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 4-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Wilkinson-Wasserstrom
100 3.50 1.50 4♣ N -1 2-Passaro-Clancey vs 4-Hill-Keen
100 3.50 1.50 2♣ N -1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 6-Stone-Ford
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ E 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
140 0.50 4.50 3♥ E 5-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Goodell-Goodell
140 0.50 4.50 3♥ E 6-Benz-Suddards vs 5-Martin-Litvak
|
29 |
♠8
♥8532
♦J7432
♣KT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.90 0.10 3♦ W -2 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Stone-Ford
80 3.70 1.30 1♠ S 4-Winham-Murdock vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
100 2.50 2.50 1♠ S -1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Hill-Keen
110 1.30 3.70 3♦ W 5-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Cooper-Keay
120 0.10 4.90 2N E 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 5-Martin-Litvak
|
30 |
♠KJ
♥KT7
♦Q876
♣AK73
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2/1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.30 0.70 3N N +1 4-Winham-Murdock vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
430 4.30 0.70 3N N +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Stone-Ford
150 2.50 2.50 2N N +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Hill-Keen
130 1.30 3.70 3♣ S +1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 5-Martin-Litvak
50 0.10 4.90 5♣ N -1 5-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Cooper-Keay
|
31 |
♠KQ5
♥A4
♦KJ7
♣KQ964
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.90 0.10 3N N +2 5-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Cooper-Keay
630 3.10 1.90 3N N +1 6-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Hill-Keen
630 3.10 1.90 3N N +1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Stone-Ford
200 1.30 3.70 6N N -2 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 5-Martin-Litvak
400 0.10 4.90 5♦ N -4 4-Winham-Murdock vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
|
32 |
♠KQJ
♥AKQ874
♦-
♣T642
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/3♣ 3/4♥ 4/5♠ 3NT ♦5/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2/3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.90 0.10 3♥ N +1 5-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Cooper-Keay
140 3.70 1.30 3♥ N 6-Benz-Suddards vs 4-Hill-Keen
50 1.30 3.70 3N S -1 7-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Stone-Ford
50 1.30 3.70 4♠ S -1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 5-Martin-Litvak
50 1.30 3.70 4♠ S -1 4-Winham-Murdock vs 7-Turnquist-Oldden
|