1 |
♠KQ
♥K8643
♦KQT9
♣76
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.88 0.13 3N N 6-Pender-Hebner vs 5-Oing-Benich
170 2.63 1.38 3♠ N +1 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 3-Wagener-Smith
50 0.75 3.25 4♥ S -1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 2-Jones-Harken
50 0.75 3.25 4♥ N -1 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
|
2 |
♠T8432
♥6
♦AK874
♣K8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.88 0.13 2♠ N +1 6-Pender-Hebner vs 5-Oing-Benich
100 2.63 1.38 4♥ E -2 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
100 1.38 2.63 3♠ N -1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 2-Jones-Harken
400 0.13 3.88 3N S -4 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 3-Wagener-Smith
|
3 |
♠AJ94
♥AKT7
♦T32
♣72
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦0 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.25 0.75 4♥ N +1 6-Pender-Hebner vs 5-Oing-Benich
450 3.25 0.75 4♥ N +1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 2-Jones-Harken
420 1.38 2.63 4♥ N 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
50 0.13 3.88 6♥ N -1 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 3-Wagener-Smith
|
4 |
♠543
♥KT52
♦J6
♣AT73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6/5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 1/-♠ ♦6/5 ♠7/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.88 0.13 4♥ W -2 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 6-Pender-Hebner
110 2.63 1.38 2♦ S +1 5-Oing-Benich vs 2-Jones-Harken
90 1.38 2.63 2♦ S 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 3-Wagener-Smith
110 0.13 3.88 1♠ E +1 8-Hill-Sullivan vs 4-Simon-Simon
|
5 |
♠-
♥AQ85
♦QJT6
♣KJT74
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6/5♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
950 3.88 0.13 5♣* N +1 8-Hill-Sullivan vs 4-Simon-Simon
620 2.63 1.38 5♦ S +1 5-Oing-Benich vs 2-Jones-Harken
500 1.38 2.63 5♠* E -3 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 6-Pender-Hebner
170 0.13 3.88 3♣ S +3 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 3-Wagener-Smith
|
6 |
♠AKQ98
♥AQJ98
♦Q9
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 2.63 1.38 3N S +2 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 3-Wagener-Smith
460 2.63 1.38 3N S +2 5-Oing-Benich vs 2-Jones-Harken
460 2.63 1.38 3N S +2 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 6-Pender-Hebner
420 0.13 3.88 4♠ N 8-Hill-Sullivan vs 4-Simon-Simon
|
7 |
♠93
♥Q9642
♦JT4
♣653
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.88 0.13 2♥ S 6-Pender-Hebner vs 3-Wagener-Smith
140 2.63 1.38 2♠ W +1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 5-Oing-Benich
200 1.38 2.63 1N S -2 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
400 0.13 3.88 1N S -4 2-Jones-Harken vs 4-Simon-Simon
|
8 |
♠KQ
♥T752
♦T95
♣6432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥5/6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 4♦ S -2 6-Pender-Hebner vs 3-Wagener-Smith
170 2.63 1.38 3♠ W +1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 5-Oing-Benich
200 0.75 3.25 3♠ W +2 2-Jones-Harken vs 4-Simon-Simon
200 0.75 3.25 3♠ W +2 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
|
9 |
♠A863
♥Q53
♦A92
♣A72
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5/4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.63 1.38 1N N -1 6-Pender-Hebner vs 3-Wagener-Smith
50 2.63 1.38 2♥ S -1 2-Jones-Harken vs 4-Simon-Simon
50 2.63 1.38 2♥ S -1 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
150 0.13 3.88 3♥ S -3 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 5-Oing-Benich
|
10 |
♠AQT72
♥9753
♦A9
♣96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2♠ 4/5NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 3.88 0.13 4♠* W -2 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 4-Simon-Simon
300 2.63 1.38 5♠ W -3 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Jones-Harken
110 1.38 2.63 3♦ E 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 6-Pender-Hebner
500 0.13 3.88 4♥* S -2 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
|
11 |
♠KJ5
♥872
♦J3
♣AJ985
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.25 0.75 2♠ W -1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
50 3.25 0.75 2♥ E -1 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 4-Simon-Simon
80 1.38 2.63 1♠ W 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 6-Pender-Hebner
100 0.13 3.88 2♣ N -2 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Jones-Harken
|
12 |
♠AJ2
♥3
♦T752
♣J9853
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5/6 ♥5/6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.25 0.75 3♠ E 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 6-Pender-Hebner
140 3.25 0.75 2♠ E +1 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 4-Simon-Simon
200 1.38 2.63 3♥ S -2 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Jones-Harken
400 0.13 3.88 3N W 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
|
13 |
♠KT98
♥Q7
♦Q972
♣874
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 2♦ W -2 2-Jones-Harken vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
150 3.00 1.00 1N S +2 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Wagener-Smith
120 1.50 2.50 1N S +1 4-Simon-Simon vs 6-Pender-Hebner
120 1.50 2.50 1N S +1 8-Hill-Sullivan vs 5-Oing-Benich
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -1 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
|
14 |
♠T2
♥KT72
♦K96
♣AQ42
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 2-Jones-Harken vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ S -2 8-Hill-Sullivan vs 5-Oing-Benich
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Wagener-Smith
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 4-Simon-Simon vs 6-Pender-Hebner
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +2 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
|
15 |
♠Q853
♥6
♦K953
♣J732
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3/2 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1/2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 4-Simon-Simon vs 6-Pender-Hebner
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Wagener-Smith
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ W +2 8-Hill-Sullivan vs 5-Oing-Benich
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +2 2-Jones-Harken vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
|
16 |
♠9863
♥QJ7
♦Q943
♣T2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 1♣ W -2 5-Oing-Benich vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 2-Jones-Harken vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 3-Wagener-Smith vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 6-Pender-Hebner
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Simon-Simon
|
17 |
♠A96
♥A532
♦KT32
♣QJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 5♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 4.00 0.00 3N S +3 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Simon-Simon
430 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 5-Oing-Benich vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
420 2.00 2.00 5♦ N +1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 6-Pender-Hebner
50 0.50 3.50 6N S -1 2-Jones-Harken vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
50 0.50 3.50 6♦ N -1 3-Wagener-Smith vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
|
18 |
♠JT85
♥K8
♦AKT7
♣J72
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ ♣6 ♦7/6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.50 0.50 1N S 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Simon-Simon
90 3.50 0.50 1N N 3-Wagener-Smith vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
50 1.50 2.50 2N W -1 5-Oing-Benich vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
50 1.50 2.50 3♣ W -1 9-Hanson-Tainty vs 6-Pender-Hebner
80 0.00 4.00 1♥ E 2-Jones-Harken vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
|
19 |
♠T94
♥A743
♦9654
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 4♦ W 4-Simon-Simon vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
660 2.00 2.00 3N W +2 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
660 2.00 2.00 3N W +2 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Oing-Benich
660 2.00 2.00 3N E +2 6-Pender-Hebner vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
690 0.00 4.00 3N W +3 3-Wagener-Smith vs 2-Jones-Harken
|
20 |
♠A53
♥KQT65
♦A53
♣AK
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 3-Wagener-Smith vs 2-Jones-Harken
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 6-Pender-Hebner vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
600 0.50 3.50 3N N 4-Simon-Simon vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
600 0.50 3.50 3N N 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Oing-Benich
|
21 |
♠A63
♥T8653
♦3
♣A965
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 1-Nielsen-Morrison vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 3-Wagener-Smith vs 2-Jones-Harken
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 4-Simon-Simon vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 6-Pender-Hebner vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Oing-Benich
|
22 |
♠QJ87
♥J754
♦AQ2
♣J6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/2♦ 1/2♥ 1/2♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 3N S 4-Simon-Simon vs 3-Wagener-Smith
150 3.00 1.00 2N N +1 5-Oing-Benich vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
120 1.50 2.50 2N N 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Pender-Hebner
120 1.50 2.50 1N S +1 2-Jones-Harken vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
90 0.00 4.00 1N S 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
|
23 |
♠AJ98
♥A
♦Q9754
♣Q75
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 5-Oing-Benich vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Pender-Hebner
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -1 2-Jones-Harken vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
100 0.50 3.50 2♠ S -1 4-Simon-Simon vs 3-Wagener-Smith
|
24 |
♠65
♥65
♦J6542
♣AJ83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 4.00 0.00 5♥ W +1 4-Simon-Simon vs 3-Wagener-Smith
510 3.00 1.00 4♥ W +3 5-Oing-Benich vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
980 2.00 2.00 6♥ W 2-Jones-Harken vs 8-Hill-Sullivan
1010 0.50 3.50 6♥ W +1 7-Belden-Sullivan vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
1010 0.50 3.50 6♥ W +1 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Pender-Hebner
|
25 |
♠QT76
♥J872
♦K843
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.25 0.75 3♠ W -2 3-Wagener-Smith vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
200 3.25 0.75 3♠* W -1 8-Hill-Sullivan vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
100 1.38 2.63 2♠ W -1 5-Oing-Benich vs 4-Simon-Simon
100 0.13 3.88 3♣ S -2 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
|
26 |
♠J83
♥63
♦7
♣KQT9832
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ ♣0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1460 3.88 0.13 6♠ S +1 8-Hill-Sullivan vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
710 2.63 1.38 5♠ S +2 3-Wagener-Smith vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
680 1.38 2.63 4♠ S +2 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
200 0.13 3.88 5♦* E -1 5-Oing-Benich vs 4-Simon-Simon
|
27 |
♠A965
♥T97
♦732
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.88 0.13 1N S 8-Hill-Sullivan vs 1-Nielsen-Morrison
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 3-Wagener-Smith vs 9-Hanson-Tainty
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 5-Oing-Benich vs 4-Simon-Simon
50 0.13 3.88 4♥ N -1 10-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Belden-Sullivan
|