1 |
♠QJ83
♥JT94
♦AJ
♣853
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.88 0.13 3♥ N 6-Pender-Hebner vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
110 2.63 1.38 2♥ N 10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
90 1.38 2.63 1N S 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 3-Hadley-Black
80 0.13 3.88 1♠ E 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
|
2 |
♠J652
♥KJ92
♦J3
♣J53
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 3N W -2 6-Pender-Hebner vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
170 2.63 1.38 1♥ W +3 10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
430 0.75 3.25 3N W +1 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 3-Hadley-Black
430 0.75 3.25 3N W +1 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
|
3 |
♠K54
♥87
♦KQ9
♣96543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 3.88 0.13 2N E +2 6-Pender-Hebner vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
630 2.63 1.38 3N E +1 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 3-Hadley-Black
660 1.38 2.63 3N W +2 10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
690 0.13 3.88 3N W +3 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
|
4 |
♠QT9
♥T97
♦AQ852
♣J9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.88 0.13 4♥ E 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Elkins-Moller
630 2.63 1.38 3N E +1 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 6-Pender-Hebner
660 0.75 3.25 3N W +2 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
660 0.75 3.25 3N E +2 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 3-Hadley-Black
|
5 |
♠K
♥A984
♦KQJT3
♣753
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 4♠ E -2 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Elkins-Moller
50 2.63 1.38 4♠ E -1 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 3-Hadley-Black
130 1.38 2.63 3♣ W +1 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 6-Pender-Hebner
150 0.13 3.88 2N W +1 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
|
6 |
♠QT964
♥Q98
♦AT82
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ -/1♦ -/1♥ 3NT ♦6/7 ♥6/7 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 5♣ E -1 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Elkins-Moller
600 1.38 2.63 3N W 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 3-Hadley-Black
600 1.38 2.63 3N W 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
600 1.38 2.63 3N W 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 6-Pender-Hebner
|
7 |
♠86
♥KT2
♦KQT8532
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 2♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥4 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 3.88 0.13 3N S +3 6-Pender-Hebner vs 3-Hadley-Black
620 2.63 1.38 5♦ N +1 10-Harken-Harken vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
170 0.75 3.25 3♦ N +3 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 4-Elkins-Moller
170 0.75 3.25 3♦ N +3 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
|
8 |
♠7
♥QJT6543
♦K95
♣95
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♥ 1/2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 4-Elkins-Moller
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 6-Pender-Hebner vs 3-Hadley-Black
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 10-Harken-Harken vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
|
9 |
♠JT853
♥AT74
♦JT3
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.25 0.75 1N W 6-Pender-Hebner vs 3-Hadley-Black
90 3.25 0.75 1N W 10-Harken-Harken vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
110 1.38 2.63 3♦ W 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
130 0.13 3.88 2♦ E +2 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 4-Elkins-Moller
|
10 |
♠76
♥874
♦KQ83
♣AQT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 5♦ 2/1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.25 0.75 3N S +1 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 4-Elkins-Moller
630 3.25 0.75 3N N +1 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 6-Pender-Hebner
600 1.38 2.63 3N S 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
100 0.13 3.88 5♦ S -1 10-Harken-Harken vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
|
11 |
♠JT6
♥KT543
♦5
♣AQ52
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 5♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.63 1.38 4♦ E 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 6-Pender-Hebner
130 2.63 1.38 4♦ E 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 4-Elkins-Moller
130 2.63 1.38 4♦ E 10-Harken-Harken vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
150 0.13 3.88 4♦ E +1 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
|
12 |
♠T5
♥A95
♦A987
♣Q854
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
360 3.88 0.13 1♠* S +1 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 6-Pender-Hebner
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ S 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
50 1.38 2.63 2♦ E -1 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 4-Elkins-Moller
200 0.13 3.88 2N N -2 10-Harken-Harken vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
|
13 |
♠K8762
♥JT5
♦82
♣Q85
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ W 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
120 3.00 1.00 1N E +1 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Hadley-Black
600 0.00 4.00 3N E 4-Elkins-Moller vs 6-Pender-Hebner
|
14 |
♠A65
♥KJT764
♦K2
♣62
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Hadley-Black
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ N +2 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 4-Elkins-Moller vs 6-Pender-Hebner
|
15 |
♠Q9
♥K
♦JT654
♣AKT94
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 4-Elkins-Moller vs 6-Pender-Hebner
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ E -1 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Hadley-Black
200 0.50 3.50 2N S -2 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
200 0.50 3.50 3♦ N -2 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
|
16 |
♠T872
♥AQJ92
♦K
♣AK8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦4 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 3N S 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Pender-Hebner
180 3.00 1.00 1N S +3 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
150 2.00 2.00 2N S +1 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ N +1 3-Hadley-Black vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
50 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -1 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Elkins-Moller
|
17 |
♠983
♥A973
♦KT32
♣74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -3 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Pender-Hebner
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N 3-Hadley-Black vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
100 1.00 3.00 4♣ E -2 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
50 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -1 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Elkins-Moller
|
18 |
♠KQT972
♥653
♦T
♣AJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Elkins-Moller
50 3.00 1.00 4♦ W -1 9-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Pender-Hebner
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 3-Hadley-Black vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
150 1.00 3.00 4♦ W +1 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
460 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
|
19 |
♠876
♥JT52
♦A8
♣AKQT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 3-Hadley-Black vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 10-Harken-Harken vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ S +1 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ S +2 4-Elkins-Moller vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ S +1 6-Pender-Hebner vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
|
20 |
♠JT4
♥QT65
♦972
♣854
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3/4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3/4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.50 1.50 3N W 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
600 2.50 1.50 3N W 3-Hadley-Black vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
600 2.50 1.50 3N W 4-Elkins-Moller vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
600 2.50 1.50 3N W 10-Harken-Harken vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
630 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 6-Pender-Hebner vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
|
21 |
♠AQ752
♥A9
♦76
♣Q842
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ E 10-Harken-Harken vs 5-Morrison-Cohen
130 2.00 2.00 4♦ E 6-Pender-Hebner vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 4-Elkins-Moller vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ E +1 1-Wainer-Tainty vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 3-Hadley-Black vs 2-Hill-Sullivan
|
22 |
♠643
♥K753
♦A65
♣KJ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 4-Elkins-Moller vs 3-Hadley-Black
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 10-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pender-Hebner
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
|
23 |
♠Q2
♥KJ86
♦764
♣QJT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.50 0.50 2♦ W +2 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
130 3.50 0.50 2♦ W +2 4-Elkins-Moller vs 3-Hadley-Black
150 1.50 2.50 2N E +1 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
150 1.50 2.50 2♦ W +3 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
600 0.00 4.00 3N E 10-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pender-Hebner
|
24 |
♠T4
♥J987643
♦A982
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ ♣2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 4NT ♦4 ♥4 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 5♣* E -1 2-Hill-Sullivan vs 8-Goodell-Goodell
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -2 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
150 2.00 2.00 4♣ E +1 4-Elkins-Moller vs 3-Hadley-Black
400 1.00 3.00 5♣ E 7-Suddards-Henderson vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 10-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pender-Hebner
|
25 |
♠QT96
♥KQJ85
♦K6
♣AQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3/2♥ 4/3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.88 0.13 4♠ S 10-Harken-Harken vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
140 2.63 1.38 2♠ S +1 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
120 1.38 2.63 2N S 3-Hadley-Black vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
50 0.13 3.88 2♠ S -1 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 4-Elkins-Moller
|
26 |
♠K974
♥AJ53
♦K
♣A732
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: -/1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5/6 ♦4/5 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.88 0.13 1N W 10-Harken-Harken vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
100 2.63 1.38 3♦ S -1 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 4-Elkins-Moller
200 1.38 2.63 3♦ S -2 3-Hadley-Black vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
300 0.13 3.88 2N N -3 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
|
27 |
♠KT92
♥75
♦AT96
♣A62
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 4♥* W -1 3-Hadley-Black vs 9-Palmer-Palmer
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 5-Morrison-Cohen vs 4-Elkins-Moller
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 10-Harken-Harken vs 7-Suddards-Henderson
170 0.13 3.88 2♥ W +2 8-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Wainer-Tainty
|