1 |
♠T873
♥T7
♦AJT9
♣T74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ -/1♦ 1♥ ♦6/7 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 1N E -3 1-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Miller-Clancey
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ E -1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 3-Benz-Suddards
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ E -1 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 4-Stevens-Keen
|
2 |
♠AQ9642
♥83
♦A854
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 1♥ -/1♠ 2NT ♦5 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 1-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Miller-Clancey
50 3.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 4-Stevens-Keen
50 3.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ E 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 3-Benz-Suddards
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ E +1 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
|
3 |
♠AT
♥763
♦432
♣K9762
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥5/6 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 4-Stevens-Keen
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +2 1-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Miller-Clancey
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ S +2 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -4 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 3-Benz-Suddards
|
4 |
♠KJ84
♥-
♦J63
♣AJT987
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ 1/2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: -/1♦ 1♥ ♣3/4 ♦6/7 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 4.00 0.00 4♥* E -2 1-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Miller-Clancey
500 3.00 1.00 4♥* E -2 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
200 2.00 2.00 2N W -2 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 3-Benz-Suddards
150 1.00 3.00 4♣ N +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
500 0.00 4.00 5♣* N -2 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 4-Stevens-Keen
|
5 |
♠J82
♥K2
♦T754
♣AQJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6/5 ♦3/2 ♥5 ♠3/2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1/2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 1-Keay-Cooper vs 1-Miller-Clancey
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 4-Stevens-Keen
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 3-Benz-Suddards
|
6 |
♠9852
♥AQT3
♦J86
♣Q2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 1-Miller-Clancey
200 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ S 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ N 1-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ S +1 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 4-Stevens-Keen
|
7 |
♠KJ6
♥A7
♦Q853
♣KT85
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣3/4 ♥2/3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 1-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 4-Stevens-Keen
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 1-Miller-Clancey
|
8 |
♠K943
♥Q3
♦A84
♣T753
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 1-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
50 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
50 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 1-Miller-Clancey
50 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 4-Stevens-Keen
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
|
9 |
♠KJ5
♥K93
♦AQT8
♣987
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5/6 NT6 |
EW: -/1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6/7 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 2N S +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ S 1-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 1-Miller-Clancey
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W +1 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
140 0.50 3.50 1♠ W +2 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 4-Stevens-Keen
|
10 |
♠QJ2
♥JT6
♦AK8
♣AKJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.88 0.13 4♦ N 1-Keay-Cooper vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
120 2.00 2.00 2N N 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
120 2.00 2.00 2N N 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 4-Stevens-Keen
100 0.13 3.88 4♥ N -1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 1-Miller-Clancey
|
11 |
♠QT3
♥K9
♦8752
♣QT96
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
530 4.00 0.00 3♥ S -3 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
110 3.00 1.00 1♥ S +1 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Miller-Clancey
50 1.50 2.50 1N N -1 1-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
50 1.50 2.50 1N N -1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 3-Benz-Suddards
|
12 |
♠53
♥AQJ52
♦8742
♣87
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
730 4.00 0.00 3♥* N 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 1-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 3-Benz-Suddards
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ E 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Miller-Clancey
|
13 |
♠AQJ74
♥QJ98
♦87
♣AJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1/2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ N 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Miller-Clancey
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 3-Benz-Suddards
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ W +2 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 1-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
|
14 |
♠AK972
♥95
♦A9
♣T964
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/-♠ ♦6 ♥3 ♠7/6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E 1-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 3-Benz-Suddards
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Miller-Clancey
300 0.00 4.00 5♣* S -2 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
|
15 |
♠JT82
♥Q2
♦QJ3
♣J854
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥2 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 6/5♦ 5/4♥ 1♠ 6/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 1-Keay-Cooper vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ E +2 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
170 2.00 2.00 3♣ E +3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Miller-Clancey
490 1.00 3.00 3N E +3 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 3-Benz-Suddards
520 0.00 4.00 3N E +4 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
|
16 |
♠T753
♥A753
♦A5
♣AK8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣2/3 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +3 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
180 3.00 1.00 1N S +3 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 1-Miller-Clancey
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ S +2 1-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Benz-Suddards
100 1.00 3.00 1♠ W -1 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Stevens-Keen
|
17 |
♠T963
♥A52
♦AKJ76
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 6♥ 5♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
520 4.00 0.00 3N S +4 1-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Benz-Suddards
510 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +3 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Stevens-Keen
430 0.00 4.00 3N S +1 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 1-Miller-Clancey
|
18 |
♠AQ975
♥7
♦7643
♣AT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 1.50 5♥ E 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Stevens-Keen
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 1-Miller-Clancey
460 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 1-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Benz-Suddards
|
19 |
♠A96
♥AT75
♦T63
♣765
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♣ W -2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Stevens-Keen
100 1.50 2.50 4♣ W -1 1-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Benz-Suddards
100 1.50 2.50 4♣ W -1 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 1-Miller-Clancey
50 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
|
20 |
♠K3
♥JT6
♦A9632
♣432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT6/5 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 1-Keay-Cooper vs 3-Benz-Suddards
110 2.50 1.50 2♣ S +1 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
110 2.50 1.50 2♣ S +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Stevens-Keen
100 1.00 3.00 4♣ S -1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 1-Miller-Clancey
|
21 |
♠Q873
♥J92
♦J9
♣9652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦0 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 7♦ 4♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
190 4.00 0.00 3♦ W +4 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 1-Miller-Clancey
240 3.00 1.00 2N E +4 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Stevens-Keen
420 2.00 2.00 5♦ W +1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
490 1.00 3.00 3N E +3 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Benz-Suddards
520 0.00 4.00 3N W +4 1-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
|
22 |
♠A54
♥9876
♦T53
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 2/3NT ♣5/6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -4 1-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
100 3.00 1.00 5♦ E -1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
600 2.00 2.00 5♦ E 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 1-Miller-Clancey
630 1.00 3.00 3N W +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Benz-Suddards
660 0.00 4.00 5N W 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Stevens-Keen
|
23 |
♠874
♥Q532
♦762
♣K84
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2/3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Stevens-Keen
630 2.50 1.50 3N S +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Benz-Suddards
630 2.50 1.50 3N S +1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
150 1.00 3.00 2N S +1 1-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 1-Miller-Clancey
|
24 |
♠AK62
♥A865
♦Q3
♣J75
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ E 1-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ S -2 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 1-Miller-Clancey
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ E +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Benz-Suddards
150 0.00 4.00 1N N -3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Stevens-Keen
|
25 |
♠QJT762
♥AT
♦864
♣73
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 2♠ N -2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Stevens-Keen
100 3.50 0.50 2♠ N -2 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Benz-Suddards
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ E +1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 1-Miller-Clancey
150 1.00 3.00 2N W +1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 1-Keay-Cooper vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
|
26 |
♠QT32
♥A75
♦KQ953
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
EW: 2/1♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 2N S 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Stevens-Keen
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ S 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Benz-Suddards
110 1.00 3.00 1♥ E +1 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
|
27 |
♠52
♥J65
♦AQ74
♣T652
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Stevens-Keen
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ S -1 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Benz-Suddards
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -2 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
|
28 |
♠QT8763
♥T85
♦KJ
♣KJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦0 ♥0 ♠4 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 2N E -1 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Stevens-Keen
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ W 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -2 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
490 1.00 3.00 3N E +3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Benz-Suddards
510 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +3 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
|
29 |
♠A964
♥Q7
♦53
♣AJ985
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -1 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Benz-Suddards
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Stevens-Keen
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
|
30 |
♠KJ972
♥K93
♦7
♣J984
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 5-McIntosh-Harken vs 4-Stevens-Keen
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 6-Edmondson-Flowers vs 6-Turnquist-Oldden
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ N 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Benz-Suddards
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ N +1 4-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Gamble-Spencer
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -3 3-Sullivan-Sullivan vs 5-Reiss-Devlin
|